Skip to content

Statistics — type 2 diabetes

Last curated: 2026-10-30. Conflicting estimates are shown side by side and are not averaged.

Global prevalence and projections

Figure Year Population Method Source
589 million 2024 Adults 20–79, all diabetes IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition model International Diabetes Federation — “Over 250 million people worldwide unaware they have diabetes, according to new IDF research”, https://idf.org/news-and-resources/news/idf-diabetes-atlas-11th-edition/, accessed 2026-10-09
536.6 million; 10.5% 2021 Adults 20–79, all diabetes IDF model using 219 sources Sun 2022, PMID 34879977
853 million 2050 projection Adults 20–79, all diabetes IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition projection International Diabetes Federation — “Over 250 million people worldwide unaware they have diabetes, according to new IDF research”, https://idf.org/news-and-resources/news/idf-diabetes-atlas-11th-edition/, accessed 2026-10-09
783.2 million; 12.2% 2045 projection Adults 20–79 IDF demographic projection Sun 2022, PMID 34879977
529 million (95% UI 500–564); age-standardised 6.1% (5.8–6.5) 2021 All ages, all diabetes GBD Bayesian modelling GBD 2021, PMID 37356446
>1.31 billion (1.22–1.39) 2050 projection All ages GBD regression projection GBD 2021, PMID 37356446
T2D = 96.0% (95.1–96.8) of cases 2021 Global Modelled type decomposition GBD 2021, PMID 37356446
506.0 million prevalent; 23.9 million incident 2021 Global T2D Secondary GBD analysis Huang 2025, PMID 40895618

Geography and disparities

Figure Year/population Method Source
Urban 12.1% vs rural 8.3% 2021 adults 20–79 IDF model PMID 34879977
High-income 11.1% vs low-income 5.5% 2021 adults 20–79 IDF model PMID 34879977
North Africa/Middle East 9.3% (8.7–9.9) age-standardised 2021 GBD model PMID 37356446
Oceania 12.3% (11.5–13.0) age-standardised 2021 GBD model PMID 37356446
Nepal pooled 8.4% (6.2–10.5); urban 8.1%, rural 1.0% Studies 2000–2014 Ten-study meta-analysis Gyawali 2015, PMID 26613684
Slum T2D range 0.9%–25.0% 62 studies Systematic review/meta-analysis Uthman 2022, PMID 35210339

Burden and attributable risk

Figure Year/population Method Source
T2D = 95.4% (94.9–95.9) of diabetes DALYs 2021 global GBD decomposition PMID 37356446
75 million T2D DALYs (63–90) 2021 global GBD secondary analysis Zhang 2024, PMID 39151887
High BMI attributable fraction 52.2% (25.5–71.8) of T2D DALYs 2021 global Comparative risk assessment PMID 37356446
Non-elderly incidence 196.3/100,000 (145.2–257.4) → 361.1 (275.2–458.4) 1990→2021, ages 15–59 GBD analysis He 2025, PMID 40348179
Each one-year older diagnosis: 4% lower mortality, 3% lower macrovascular, 5% lower microvascular risk 1,325,493 adults, 30 countries 26-study meta-analysis adjusted for current age Nanayakkara 2021, PMID 33313987

Costs

Figure Year/population Method Source
>US$1 trillion 2024 global diabetes health expenditure IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition expenditure estimate International Diabetes Federation — “Over 250 million people worldwide unaware they have diabetes, according to new IDF research”, https://idf.org/news-and-resources/news/idf-diabetes-atlas-11th-edition/, accessed 2026-10-09
US$966 billion 2021 global diabetes health expenditure Attributable-fraction model PMID 34879977
US$1.054 trillion 2045 projection IDF projection PMID 34879977
Direct annual cost US$242–11,917/person Studies 2001–2014 Global systematic review, 2011 international dollars Seuring 2015, PMID 25787932
Indirect annual cost US$45–16,914/person Studies 2001–2014 Same review PMID 25787932
Total annual cost US$29.91–237.38/person in low/lower-middle-income studies Eight studies to 2018 Systematic review Afroz 2018, PMID 30558591

Prevention and remission

Figure Time Population/method Source
DPP lifestyle incidence −58%; metformin −31% Mean 2.8 years 3,234 high-risk adults, RCT Knowler 2002, PMID 11832527
DPPOS lifestyle −27%; metformin −18% 15 years Follow-up by original assignment PMID 26377054
DiRECT remission 46% vs 4% 1 year Cluster RCT, early T2D PMID 29221645
DiRECT remission 36% vs 3% 2 years Trial follow-up PMID 30852132
DiRECT extension remission 13% vs 5% 5 years Extension cohort PMID 38423026
Remission 86% with ≥15 kg loss vs 7% with 0–5 kg 1 year DiRECT subgroup PMID 29221645

Therapy outcomes

Trial statistic Population Source
EMPA-REG MACE HR 0.86; CV death −38%; HF admission −35%; all-cause death −32% T2D + established CVD Zinman 2015, PMID 26378978
LEADER MACE HR 0.87; CV death HR 0.78 T2D high CV risk Marso 2016, PMID 27295427
REWIND MACE 12.0% vs 13.4%; HR 0.88 (0.79–0.99) T2D with/without prior CVD Gerstein 2019, PMID 31189511
CREDENCE kidney composite HR 0.70 T2D + albuminuric CKD Perkovic 2019, PMID 30990260
DAPA-CKD primary composite HR 0.61 CKD with/without diabetes Heerspink 2020, PMID 32970396
SELECT MACE HR 0.80 Obesity + CVD, no diabetes Lincoff 2023, PMID 37952131
Tirzepatide HbA1c change up to −2.30 percentage points T2D, SURPASS-2 Frías 2021, PMID 34170647
Tirzepatide weight −20.9% at 15 mg Obesity without diabetes, 72 weeks Jastreboff 2022, PMID 35658024

Youth-onset disease

Figure Population/time Source
Glycaemic failure 45.6% TODAY, mean 3.9 years PMID 22540912
≥1 microvascular complication 60.1% Mean age 26.4, duration 13.3 years PMID 34320286
≥2 microvascular complications 28.4% Same cohort PMID 34320286

Additional prevalence and care-cascade estimates

Figure Year/population Method Source
828 million adults (95% CrI 757–908 million) 2022; age ≥18; all diabetes Bayesian pooling of 1,108 measured population studies NCD-RisC 2024, PMID 39549716
252 million unaware of diabetes 2024; adults 20–79, all diabetes IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th edition model International Diabetes Federation — “Over 250 million people worldwide unaware they have diabetes, according to new IDF research”, https://idf.org/news-and-resources/news/idf-diabetes-atlas-11th-edition/, accessed 2026-10-09
445 million untreated (401–496 million); 59% 2022; age ≥30 with diabetes Medication coverage in same pooled analysis PMID 39549716
108 million → 422 million 1980→2014; adults; all diabetes 751 population-based studies NCD-RisC 2016, PMID 27061677
28.5% prevalence change; 39.7% population growth; remainder ageing/interaction Contribution to 1980–2014 numerical growth Demographic decomposition PMID 27061677
Diagnosed 55.8% (95% UI 49.3–62.3) 2023; age ≥15 global GBD-linked cascade model Stafford 2025, PMID 40934935
Treated among diagnosed 91.4% (88.0–94.2) Same Same PMID 40934935
Optimal glycaemia among treated 41.6% (35.7–48.5) Same Same PMID 40934935
Optimal glycaemia on treatment among all diabetes 21.2% (17.4–25.6) Same Same PMID 40934935
Comprehensive recommended treatment coverage 4.6% (3.9–5.4) 37,094 adults with diabetes in 55 LMIC surveys Cross-sectional individual-level analysis Flood 2021, PMID 35211689
Glucose/BP/lipid medication coverage 50.5%/41.3%/6.3% Same Self-report, equal country weighting PMID 35211689
US diabetes 14.3%; undiagnosed 5.2% 2011–2012 adults NHANES HbA1c+FPG+OGTT definition Menke 2015, PMID 26348752
US diabetes 12.3%; 25.2% of cases undiagnosed Same NHANES HbA1c+FPG definition without OGTT PMID 26348752
Within 1 year of laboratory-confirmed diabetes: code + treatment 66.6%; code only 19.7%; treatment only 4.1%; neither 9.6% 27,650 US commercially insured/Medicare adults, 2017–2023 Claims linked to laboratory results; abstract-reported Stimpson 2026, PMID 42832327

Prevention, remission and surgery deepening

Figure Time/population Method Source
Finnish DPS diabetes 11% vs 23%; relative reduction 58% 4 years; 522 adults with IGT RCT Tuomilehto 2001, PMID 11333990
Incidence 4.3 vs 7.4/100 person-years; 43% relative reduction Median 7 years Post-trial follow-up Lindström 2006, PMID 17098085
IDPP-1 3-year incidence 55.0% control vs 39.3% lifestyle, 40.5% metformin, 39.5% combination 531 Asian Indian adults with IGT RCT Ramachandran 2006, PMID 16391903
DPP 10-year cumulative reduction 34% lifestyle, 18% metformin Median 10 years Randomised assignment follow-up Knowler 2009, PMID 19878986
Da Qing diabetes HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41–0.81) 20 years after 6-year intervention Clinic-randomised follow-up Li 2008, PMID 18502303
Da Qing severe retinopathy 9.2% vs 16.2%; HR 0.53 (0.29–0.99) 20 years Follow-up Gong 2011, PMID 21046360
Look AHEAD remission 11.5% vs 2.0% at year 1; 7.3% vs 2.0% at year 4 4,503 adults RCT ancillary analysis Gregg 2012, PMID 23288372
Real-world consensus remission 3.2%; stricter definitions 0.8%–2.3% 338,791 assessable insured US adults Claims plus laboratory cohort Sheils 2023, PMID 37583561
Remission-associated CKD HR 0.67 (0.52–0.87), CVD HR 0.60 (0.47–0.79) Look AHEAD follow-up Post-randomisation adjusted association Gregg 2024, PMID 38233592
STAMPEDE HbA1c ≤6.0%: 38% bypass, 24% sleeve, 5% medical 3 years; n=150 RCT Schauer 2014, PMID 24679060
SOS T2D life expectancy +2.1 years (0.2–4.0), mortality HR 0.77 (0.61–0.97) Median 26 years Prospective controlled cohort Carlsson 2023, PMID 37438611
ARMMS-T2D remission 58% surgery vs 3% medical-lifestyle 262 randomised adults; median 11 years (max 14) Pooled RCT follow-up; abstract-reported Simonson 2026, PMID 42900776
National DPP: 1.94 (1.44–2.44) fewer diabetes cases per 100 participants at 12 months; 1.58 (0.76–2.39) at 24 months 245,896 privately insured US adults with prediabetes and a lifestyle-treatment claim Instrumental-variable natural experiment vs lower-intensity services Chorniy 2026, PMID 42227951

Organ protection and monitoring deepening

Trial/statistic Population/time Source
Steno-2 CV HR 0.47 (0.24–0.73); nephropathy 0.39 (0.17–0.87); retinopathy 0.42 (0.21–0.86) 160 T2D with microalbuminuria; 7.8 years Gaede 2003, PMID 12556541
Steno-2 death HR 0.54 (0.32–0.89) 13.3 years Gaede 2008, PMID 18256393
EMPEROR-Preserved primary 13.8% vs 17.1%; HR 0.79 (0.69–0.90) HF EF >40%, ± diabetes Anker 2021, PMID 34449189
DELIVER primary 16.4% vs 19.5%; HR 0.82 (0.73–0.92) HF EF >40%, ± diabetes Solomon 2022, PMID 36027570
SOLOIST-WHF total-event HR 0.67 (0.52–0.85) T2D after worsening HF Bhatt 2021, PMID 33200892
SOUL MACE 12.0% vs 13.8%; HR 0.86 (0.77–0.96) 9,650 high-risk T2D McGuire 2025, PMID 40162642
SURPASS-CVOT MACE 12.2% vs 13.1%; HR 0.92 (95.3% CI 0.83–1.01) Tirzepatide vs dulaglutide; 13,165 modified ITT Nicholls 2025, PMID 41406444
MOBILE HbA1c difference −0.4 points (−0.8 to −0.1); time-in-range +15 points (8–23) 175 basal-insulin-treated adults; 8 months Martens 2021, PMID 34077499
CONNECT HbA1c difference −0.9 points (−1.1 to −0.6); time-in-range +21 points (16–26) 283 non-insulin-treated adults, US primary care; 26 weeks Oser 2026, PMID 42878622
ACHIEVE-4 MACE-4 4.2% vs 5.0%; HR 0.84 (0.59–1.20) Orforglipron vs insulin glargine; 2,749 T2D with CVD/CKD; median 2 years Klein 2026, PMID 42815506
Semaglutide pooled kidney composite (incl. CV death) HR 0.84 (0.77–0.91); excluding CV death HR 0.80 (0.69–0.92) SELECT+FLOW+SOUL, n=30,787, with and without diabetes Mann 2026, PMID 42567173
MASLD prevalence 65.33% (62.35%–68.18%); advanced fibrosis 15.49% in biopsy studies T2D meta-analysis Younossi 2024, PMID 38521116
Charcot foot five-year mortality 24.5% (17.2%–32.6%); amputation 15% Meta-analysis Yammine 2022, PMID 36028441

Youth and acute safety deepening

Figure Population/time Source
Youth T2D incidence 17.9/100,000; annual increase 5.31% (4.46%–6.17%) US ages 10–19, 2017–2018/end of 2002–2018 trend Wagenknecht 2023, PMID 36868256
Youth T2D prevalence 0.34→0.67/1,000; +95.3% (77.0%–115.4%) Six US areas, 2001→2017 Lawrence 2021, PMID 34427600
Liraglutide HbA1c treatment difference −1.06 points Ages 10–<17, 26 weeks Tamborlane 2019, PMID 31034184
Empagliflozin HbA1c difference −0.84 points (−1.50 to −0.19) Ages 10–17, 26 weeks Laffel 2023, PMID 36738751
Combined DKA–HHS mortality OR 2.7 (1.4–4.9) vs isolated crises 1,211 crisis admissions Pasquel 2020, PMID 31704689
HHS inpatient mortality 1.44%→0.77% US admissions 2008→2018 Shaka 2022, PMID 35122906
SGLT2-inhibitor ketoacidosis 2.43/1,000 person-years; 25.1% still on SGLT2i 1 year after event 322,597 treatment episodes, Sweden/Denmark/Norway 2013–2021/22 Kadesjö 2026, PMID 42679839
Severe hypoglycaemia associated death HR 2.69 (1.97–3.67) ADVANCE; 11,140 participants Zoungas 2010, PMID 20925543

Diabetes distress intervention evidence

Figure Population/time Method Source
Distress SMD −0.31 (95% CI −0.50 to −0.13) for psychological intervention vs usual care Adults with T2D; 21 RCTs, n=4,550 EASD-commissioned meta-analysis; very low-certainty evidence Schipper 2026, PMID 42726276; Speight 2026, PMID 42744915
Distress SMD −0.34 (95% CI −0.56 to −0.11) for education vs usual care Adults with T2D; 3 RCTs, n=317 Same synthesis; low-certainty evidence Schipper 2026, PMID 42726276; Speight 2026, PMID 42744915

October 2026 achieved-glycaemia analysis

Figure Population/time Method and limitation Source
All-cause mortality HR 0.282 (95% CI 0.108–0.738), updated mean HbA1c <6.5% versus ≥8.5% Japanese J-DOIT3 participants after a one-year landmark Time-dependent achieved-exposure association, Table 4(c); pooled original treatment groups, not randomised HbA1c categories; does not establish a safe lower target Noda 2026, PMID 42912779

IDF’s current facts-and-figures page and the WHO diabetes fact sheet were rechecked on 2026-10-30. They still present the previously catalogued 2024 IDF and 2022 WHO prevalence years; no newer burden estimate was added from those pages (IDF — “Facts & figures”, https://idf.org/about-diabetes/facts-figures/; WHO — “Diabetes”, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes, both accessed 2026-10-30).

Known conflicts and caveats

  • IDF and GBD totals use different age ranges, sources and models; do not average them. The 2024 IDF Atlas values were published in April 2025 and recovered during this sweep; they are not new 2026 statistics. All IDF totals here cover all diabetes, not type 2 alone.
  • “Diabetes” is not always type-specific; T2D is often calculated by modelled subtraction.
  • DALYs and attributable fractions are model outputs with uncertainty wider than sampling error.
  • Cost estimates use incompatible currencies, years, health-system perspectives and included components.
  • Trial relative effects cannot be converted to population impact without baseline risk, adherence and access.
  • Remission denominators differ at five years because extension participation is selective.
  • NCD-RisC, IDF and GBD use different ages, tests and modelling; their totals are parallel estimands.
  • Care-cascade proportions are conditional: treated-among-diagnosed can be high while population control remains low.
  • Post-randomisation remission associations do not prove that remission itself causes lower event rates.
  • Historical surgical cohorts include procedures and medical comparators unlike current practice.
  • Youth projections range widely according to whether incidence is held constant or extrapolated.