Skip to content

Statistics quick reference — migraine

Last audited: 2026-08-30. Figures are reusable only with their population, method and uncertainty. Every PMID was re-fetched through live PubMed E-utilities in the audit session.

Disease scale and burden

Figure Population / method Year Source
1.2 billion people modelled with migraine GBD 2023, hierarchical Bayesian synthesis 2023 GBD 2023 Collaborators, PMID 41240916
Cases rose 58.15%, 732.56 million to 1.16 billion Re-analysis of GBD 1990–2021; growth includes demography/model effects 1990–2021 Dong 2025, PMID 39661241
Approximate annual prevalence 6% in men, 15–18% in women Older US population synthesis published 1997 Lipton 1997, PMID 9058393
<5% reached specialist care in older epidemiology Historical US epidemiology published 1993 Silberstein 1993, PMID 8272178
Current acute prescription: 22.9%; discontinued: 12.6%; none: 64.5% CaMEO, 13,624 US respondents published 2020 Hutchinson 2020, PMID 32247344

Interpretation: GBD is a modelled comparative-burden system, not one global survey. Do not compare releases without accounting for changed inputs and time-symptomatic adjustment.

Diagnostic and frequency thresholds

Rule Exact threshold Source
Migraine without aura ≥5 attacks, 4–72 h, specified pain and associated features ICHD-3, PMID 29368949
Migraine with aura ≥2 attacks; ≥3 of 6 temporal/phenotypic features ICHD-3, PMID 29368949
Chronic migraine ≥15 headache days/month for >3 months; migraine features/response on ≥8 days ICHD-3, PMID 29368949
MOH general frame ≥15 headache days/month plus >3 months regular class-threshold overuse ICHD-3, PMID 29368949
Triptan/opioid/combination overuse ≥10 days/month ICHD-3, PMID 29368949
Simple analgesic/NSAID overuse ≥15 days/month ICHD-3, PMID 29368949

These are operational diagnostic cutoffs, not demonstrated biological discontinuities.

Acute treatment effects

Intervention / outcome Active Placebo / comparator Effect Source
Rimegepant ODT, 2-h pain freedom 21% 11% RD 10% (95% CI 6–14) Croop 2019, PMID 31311674
Rimegepant, 2-h MBS freedom 35% 27% RD 8% (3–13) Croop 2019, PMID 31311674
Ubrogepant 50 mg, 2-h pain freedom 21.8% 14.3% RD 7.5% (2.6–12.5) Lipton 2019, PMID 31742631
Ubrogepant 50 mg, 2-h MBS freedom 38.9% 27.4% RD 11.5% (5.4–17.5) Lipton 2019, PMID 31742631
Zavegepant nasal, 2-h pain freedom 24% 15% RD 8.8% (4.5–13.1) Lipton 2023, PMID 36804093
Zavegepant nasal, 2-h MBS freedom 40% 31% RD 8.7% (3.4–13.9) Lipton 2023, PMID 36804093
Oral drugs vs placebo, 2-h pain freedom OR 1.73 (1.27–2.34), naratriptan, to 5.19 (4.25–6.33), eletriptan Karlsson 2024, PMID 39293828
Eletriptan vs other active drugs network OR range 1.46–3.01 Karlsson 2024, PMID 39293828

MBS = most bothersome symptom; RD = risk difference. Pivotal gepant absolute benefits are real and modest; network odds ratios are not equivalent to risk differences.

Prevention effects

Trial / population Active result Control result Contrast / interpretation Source
STRIVE erenumab 70/140 mg, episodic MMD −3.2 / −3.7 −1.8 active–placebo −1.4 / −1.9 Goadsby 2017, PMID 29171821
STRIVE ≥50% response 43.3% / 50.0% 26.6% absolute +16.7 / +23.4 points Goadsby 2017, PMID 29171821
Rimegepant preventive MMD −4.3 −3.5 LSMD −0.8 days (95% CI −1.46 to −0.20) Croop 2021, PMID 33338437
HER-MES discontinuation due to AEs erenumab 10.6% topiramate 38.9% −28.3 points Reuter 2022, PMID 34743579
HER-MES ≥50% response erenumab 55.4% topiramate 31.2% +24.2 points Reuter 2022, PMID 34743579
Preventive network meta-analysis 74 trials; 32,990 participants multiple drugs/placebo high-certainty responder evidence for CGRP agents and topiramate Lampl 2023, PMID 37208596
TEMPLE AE discontinuation atogepant 12% (33/273) topiramate 30% (79/267) RR 0.4 (95% CI 0.3–0.6) Reuter 2026, PMID 42492556
TEMPLE ≥50% response atogepant 64% (173/270) topiramate 39% (101/257) RR 1.6 (95% CI 1.4–2.0) Reuter 2026, PMID 42492556
TEMPLE MMD change atogepant −6.3 topiramate −4.5 LS mean difference −1.8 days (95% CI −2.5 to −1.0) Reuter 2026, PMID 42492556

Chronic migraine and medication overuse

Figure Context Source
Chronic migraine affects roughly 1–2% of population and ~8% of people with migraine Review synthesis; definitions/studies vary May 2016, PMID 27389092
Approximate annual episodic-to-chronic conversion near 3% Older synthesis; causal factors unresolved May 2016, PMID 27389092
Approximate two-year remission near 26% Frequency categories are dynamic May 2016, PMID 27389092
PREEMPT pooled n=1,384 Two phase 3 chronic-migraine trials Dodick 2010, PMID 20487038
Withdrawal + early prevention yielded highest six-month MOH cure Randomized strategy trial; exact regimen/context required Carlsen 2020, PMID 32453406

Pediatric evidence

Figure Population Source
CHAMP randomized n=361, ages 8–17 Pediatric migraine prevention Powers 2017, PMID 27788026
≥50% response: amitriptyline 52%, topiramate 55%, placebo 61% Trial stopped for futility; more active-arm harms Powers 2017, PMID 27788026
CBT + amitriptyline reduced headache days/disability more than education + amitriptyline Pediatric chronic migraine; isolates CBT increment, not amitriptyline necessity Powers 2013, PMID 24368463

Menstrual and reproductive statistics

Figure Population / method Source
Menstrual migraine about 20–25% of women with migraine Population synthesis; clinic estimates higher Vetvik 2021, PMID 33600767
Pure menstrual migraine <1%; self-report vs diary κ=0.28 607-woman electronic diary study Verhagen 2022, PMID 35514214
49 women followed prospectively showed increasing improvement across pregnancy and postpartum recurrence Small prospective cohort Sances 2003, PMID 12662187
69,929 pregnancies: no overall first-trimester triptan major-malformation association Norwegian observational cohort; residual confounding/drug mix Nezvalová-Henriksen 2010, PMID 20132339

Genetics and biomarkers

Figure Population / method Source
102,084 cases; 771,257 controls; 123 loci, 86 new GWAS meta-analysis Hautakangas 2022, PMID 35115687
Subtype analysis n=29,679 cases Shared and subtype-specific signals Hautakangas 2022, PMID 35115687
No validated clinical blood, CSF, imaging, EEG or genetic selector Cross-domain evidence synthesis Ashina 2021, PMID 33773610
Baseline plasma suPAR did not predict erenumab response: OR 0.83 (95% CI 0.64–1.07) REFORM prospective cohort, n=623 treated participants Karlsson 2025, PMID 40275185

Conflicts that should remain visible

Apparent conflict Resolution
Large within-arm MMD reductions vs small placebo-adjusted effects Report both; regression, expectation and background care contribute to both arms
High drug ranking vs unsuitable individual Efficacy ranking does not override contraindication, route, adverse events or access
Migraine/stroke association vs prevention of stroke Association is not evidence that migraine treatment changes vascular outcomes
CGRP-antibody vs onabotulinumtoxinA IS/TIA HR 0.524 (95% CI 0.263–1.046) 36 events; met a non-inferiority margin but does not establish equivalence or protection (Gül 2026, PMID 42390441)
Positive biomarker classifier vs no clinical biomarker Development-sample discrimination is not locked multisite clinical validation
High pediatric improvement vs no active-drug superiority Placebo/context response can be large; compare randomized arms