Skip to content

Statistics — neuropathic pain

Last updated: 2026-08-30. Conflicting estimates are shown rather than averaged.

Measure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics 3–17% General population; studies to 2012 21-study systematic review PMID 24291734
Validated-tool prevalence 6.9–10% General population Screening-instrument studies PMID 24291734
UK chronic pain 43.5% (38.4–48.6) 139,933 adults Meta-analysis PMID 27324708
CKD neuropathic pain 10% (6–15) 40,678 people Meta-analysis PMID 33940112
Painful diabetic neuropathy 10–20% People with diabetes Literature synthesis PMID 18828198
Pain among diabetic neuropathy 40–50% Diabetic neuropathy Literature synthesis PMID 18828198
Painful diabetic neuropathy among diabetic peripheral neuropathy 46.7% (41.8–51.7) 41 studies; searches through 2024-06-22 Random-effects systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 40107621
Painful diabetic neuropathy risk: female sex OR 1.58 (1.19–2.11) People with diabetic peripheral neuropathy Meta-analysis of observational studies PMID 40107621
Painful diabetic neuropathy risk: BMI ≥30 kg/m² OR 1.62 (1.43–1.83) People with diabetic peripheral neuropathy Meta-analysis of observational studies PMID 40107621
CIPN month 1 68.1% (57.7–78.4) 4,179 patients Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 25261162
CIPN 3 months 60.0% (36.4–81.6) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25261162
CIPN ≥6 months 30.0% (6.4–53.5) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25261162
Fall/near-fall hazard with significant CIPN symptoms HR 2.67 (1.62–4.41) 116 patients starting taxane/platinum chemotherapy; mean follow-up 62 days Prospective daily symptom/fall reporting; post hoc secondary analysis PMID 27183099
Fall-related medical care with vs without significant CIPN symptoms 25.0% vs 7.1% Same; 32 with significant symptoms and 84 without Prospective cohort comparison PMID 27183099
SCI neuropathic pain 53% (38.58–67.47) 2,529 people Meta-analysis PMID 27341614
SCI at-level pain 19% (13.26–26.39) Same Meta-analysis PMID 27341614
SCI below-level pain 27% (19.89–34.61) Same Meta-analysis PMID 27341614
SCI neuropathic pain, updated estimate 57% (51–64) 24 studies; 6,318 adults Valid-classification systematic review/meta-analysis; I²=96.2% PMID 41043376
SCI below-level neuropathic pain, updated estimate 30% Same Prespecified level subgroup PMID 41043376
SCI at-level neuropathic pain, updated estimate 20% Same Prespecified level subgroup PMID 41043376
PHN after zoster 5% to >30% 130 studies/26 countries Systematic review PMID 24916088
PHN persisting >1 year >30% in some studies PHN cohorts Systematic review PMID 24916088
Live zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster 45.9% (42.2–49.4) Adults ≥50; 7 observational studies Post-licensure systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 36098300
Live zoster vaccine effectiveness against PHN 59.7% (58.4–89.7) Adults ≥50; 3 observational studies Post-licensure systematic review/meta-analysis; very-low-certainty evidence PMID 36098300
Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster 79.2% (57.6–89.7) Adults ≥50; 2 post-2020 US studies Post-hoc pooled observational analysis PMID 36098300
Trigeminal neuralgia incidence 25.33/100,000 person-years (11.87–54.02) 17 studies; >170 million participants; 1945–2024 Random-effects systematic review/meta-regression PMID 41517817
Trigeminal neuralgia annual prevalence 45.38/100,000 (15.41–133.61) Same Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 41517817
Central post-stroke pain 11% (7–18) 69 eligible papers; stroke at any location Systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 32451951
Central post-stroke pain present at stroke onset 26% (18–35) Patients who developed central post-stroke pain Meta-analysis of timing PMID 32451951
Central post-stroke pain developing within 1 month 31% (22–42) Same Meta-analysis of timing PMID 32451951
Central post-stroke pain developing 1–12 months 41% (33.9–49.0) Same Meta-analysis of timing PMID 32451951
Any pain in multiple sclerosis 63% (55–70) 17 studies; 5,319 adults with definite MS Systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 23318126
Neuropathic extremity pain in multiple sclerosis 26% (7–53) Adults with definite MS Syndrome-specific meta-analysis PMID 23318126
Neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis, updated 26.8% 24 studies at low risk of bias Systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 37777076
Neuropathic pain in secondary-progressive MS 40.3% MS cohorts in updated synthesis Clinical-type subgroup PMID 37777076
Neuropathic pain in primary-progressive MS 15.6% Same Clinical-type subgroup PMID 37777076
Phantom-limb pain after combat amputation 57% (46–68) 31 studies; 14,738 military personnel Random-effects systematic review/meta-analysis; I² 94–98% PMID 38112578
Residual-limb pain after combat amputation 61% (50–71) Same Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 38112578
Chronic neuropathic pain after combat injury 26% (10–54) Same Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 38112578
Neuropathic pain in burn scars at discharge 66.5% 915 Burn Model System participants National longitudinal database analysis PMID 37916448
Postsurgical neuropathic fraction—breast 68% Persistent-pain cases 281-study review PMID 23273105
—thoracic 66% Persistent-pain cases Same PMID 23273105
—hernia 31% Persistent-pain cases Same PMID 23273105
—arthroplasty 6% Persistent-pain cases Same PMID 23273105
SNRI NNT for 50% relief 6.4 (5.2–8.4) Neuropathic-pain RCTs NeuPSIG meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Gabapentin NNT 7.2 (5.9–9.21) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Pregabalin NNT 7.7 (6.5–9.4) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Capsaicin 8% NNT 10.6 (7.4–19.0) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Duloxetine diabetic pain NNT 5 (4–7) 12-week trials Cochrane review PMID 24385423
Opioid mean pain difference −0.69/10 (−0.82 to −0.56) 96 chronic-pain RCTs Meta-analysis PMID 30561481
Opioid mean function difference +2.04/100 (1.41–2.68) Same Meta-analysis PMID 30561481
Health utility range 0.15–0.61 24 neuropathic-pain studies Meta-analysis PMID 20227832

Known conflicts and caveats

  • Screening prevalence is not probable/definite neuropathic pain.
  • CIPN estimates include painful and painless neuropathy and mix agents.
  • The 46.7% painful-diabetic-neuropathy estimate is conditional on already having diabetic peripheral neuropathy; case-finding instruments significantly changed prevalence, so it is not interchangeable with prevalence among all people with diabetes.
  • The updated SCI estimate used valid classification systems but retained extreme heterogeneity (I²=96.2%); classification system significantly affected prevalence and the 2016 and 2025 estimates should remain side by side.
  • The CIPN fall estimate was a hypothesis generated after data collection in a small, predominantly female cancer cohort; it supports risk surveillance but not a causal effect estimate for every neurotoxic regimen.
  • Postsurgical percentages are conditional on persistent pain, not incidence among all operations.
  • Zoster-vaccine effectiveness estimates are observational, geographically concentrated and rated very low certainty; the recombinant-vaccine estimate was a two-study post-hoc analysis.
  • Trigeminal-neuralgia estimates span eight decades and very wide intervals; changing diagnostic criteria and incorporation of imaging are plausible sources of temporal variation.
  • Central post-stroke pain can appear after discharge: the timing categories are conditional on developing the syndrome and are not incidence risks for all stroke survivors.
  • Multiple-sclerosis pain estimates separate all pain from neuropathic pain; the updated clinical-type and sex subgroup estimates should not be interpreted as causal because definitions and study composition vary.
  • Combat-amputation estimates have I² of 94–98%, inconsistent case definitions and limited reporting of duration and impact; they are not automatically generalizable to civilian amputation.
  • Burn-scar neuropathic pain was self-reported in a rehabilitation database; 66.5% is a discharge-time cohort estimate, not a population incidence rate.
  • NNTs pool etiologies, doses and short trial durations.
  • Utility values reflect instrument, condition and severity; they should not be pooled with symptom prevalence.