Skip to content

Statistics — neuropathic pain

Last updated: 2026-10-21. Conflicting estimates are shown rather than averaged.

Measure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics 3–17% General population; studies to 2012 21-study systematic review PMID 24291734
Validated-tool prevalence 6.9–10% General population Screening-instrument studies PMID 24291734
UK chronic pain 43.5% (38.4–48.6) 139,933 adults Meta-analysis PMID 27324708
CKD neuropathic pain 10% (6–15) 40,678 people Meta-analysis PMID 33940112
Painful diabetic neuropathy 10–20% People with diabetes Literature synthesis PMID 18828198
Pain among diabetic neuropathy 40–50% Diabetic neuropathy Literature synthesis PMID 18828198
Painful diabetic neuropathy, graded diagnosis 26.2% (any diabetic neuropathy 58.6%) 500 consecutively enrolled people with type 2 diabetes Cross-sectional; examination, nerve conduction, skin biopsy when indicated, neuropathic-pain grading system PMID 42663556
Painful diabetic neuropathy with GLP-1 receptor agonist vs other treatment Adjusted OR 0.32 (0.15–0.65) Same; 140 GLP-1 RA, 152 SGLT2i, 208 standard treatment Cross-sectional association; not randomized PMID 42663556
Painful diabetic neuropathy among diabetic peripheral neuropathy 46.7% (41.8–51.7) 41 studies; searches through 2024-06-22 Random-effects systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 40107621
Painful diabetic neuropathy risk: female sex OR 1.58 (1.19–2.11) People with diabetic peripheral neuropathy Meta-analysis of observational studies PMID 40107621
Painful diabetic neuropathy risk: BMI ≥30 kg/m² OR 1.62 (1.43–1.83) People with diabetic peripheral neuropathy Meta-analysis of observational studies PMID 40107621
CIPN month 1 68.1% (57.7–78.4) 4,179 patients Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 25261162
CIPN 3 months 60.0% (36.4–81.6) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25261162
CIPN ≥6 months 30.0% (6.4–53.5) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25261162
Chronic CIPN (persisting ≥3 months after chemotherapy), overall 44.50% (40.77–48.25) 197 studies; 36 countries; 72,794 chemotherapy recipients; search to May 2025 Random-effects meta-analysis; I²=99%; GRADE very low PMID 42713463
Chronic CIPN at 3–12 months after chemotherapy 54.37% (48.24–60.45) Same Time-since-completion subgroup PMID 42713463
Chronic CIPN at 12–24 months after chemotherapy 37.12% (30.15–44.26) Same Time-since-completion subgroup PMID 42713463
Chronic CIPN at ≥24 months after chemotherapy 40.36% (34.72–46.08) Same Time-since-completion subgroup PMID 42713463
Chronic CIPN after platinum / taxane regimens 61.12% (43.08–78.37) / 57.22% (49.99–64.35) Same Regimen subgroups PMID 42713463
CIPN clinical grade ≥2, median 12 months after neurotoxic treatment 37% (337/901) 901 people treated with taxanes, platinum, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib or thalidomide; Australian oncology centres Multisite cross-sectional study; abstract only PMID 42814908
Dose modification because of CIPN 31% Same Same PMID 42814908
Dose-limiting CIPN, female vs male OR 1.7 (1.2–2.5) Same LASSO selection then multivariable logistic regression PMID 42814908
Grade ≥3 CIPN with reduced vs standard oxaliplatin exposure OR 0.34 (0.21–0.57) 24 studies (15 RCTs, 9 retrospective); 30,395 patients with GI cancers Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 42801795
Disease-free survival with reduced oxaliplatin exposure, adjuvant colorectal cancer HR 1.06 (0.97–1.17) Same Same PMID 42801795
CIPN at end of taxane treatment (TNS ≥2), cryotherapy vs usual care 74% (91/123) vs 84% (79/94); P=.071 268 randomized, 217 analyzed (CryoPac) RCT; primary endpoint; abstract only PMID 42838271
Fall/near-fall hazard with significant CIPN symptoms HR 2.67 (1.62–4.41) 116 patients starting taxane/platinum chemotherapy; mean follow-up 62 days Prospective daily symptom/fall reporting; post hoc secondary analysis PMID 27183099
Fall-related medical care with vs without significant CIPN symptoms 25.0% vs 7.1% Same; 32 with significant symptoms and 84 without Prospective cohort comparison PMID 27183099
SCI neuropathic pain 53% (38.58–67.47) 2,529 people Meta-analysis PMID 27341614
SCI at-level pain 19% (13.26–26.39) Same Meta-analysis PMID 27341614
SCI below-level pain 27% (19.89–34.61) Same Meta-analysis PMID 27341614
SCI neuropathic pain, updated estimate 57% (51–64) 24 studies; 6,318 adults Valid-classification systematic review/meta-analysis; I²=96.2% PMID 41043376
SCI below-level neuropathic pain, updated estimate 30% Same Prespecified level subgroup PMID 41043376
SCI at-level neuropathic pain, updated estimate 20% Same Prespecified level subgroup PMID 41043376
PHN after zoster 5% to >30% 130 studies/26 countries Systematic review PMID 24916088
PHN persisting >1 year >30% in some studies PHN cohorts Systematic review PMID 24916088
Live zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster 45.9% (42.2–49.4) Adults ≥50; 7 observational studies Post-licensure systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 36098300
Live zoster vaccine effectiveness against PHN 59.7% (58.4–89.7) Adults ≥50; 3 observational studies Post-licensure systematic review/meta-analysis; very-low-certainty evidence PMID 36098300
Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster 79.2% (57.6–89.7) Adults ≥50; 2 post-2020 US studies Post-hoc pooled observational analysis PMID 36098300
Recombinant zoster vaccine efficacy against PHN 91.2% (75.9–97.7) Immunocompetent adults ≥50; pooled ZOE trials Systematic review; GRADE moderate certainty PMID 42748460
Recombinant zoster vaccine efficacy against PHN, long-term 87.5% (64.8–96.8) at 11 years Long-term trial follow-up with historical controls Systematic review; GRADE low certainty PMID 42748460
LZ901 vaccine efficacy against PHN, trial definition 95.9% (63.9–99.9); 1 vs 24 cases Adults ≥40, China; 12 months; per-protocol 12,707 vs 12,680 Phase 3 placebo-controlled RCT PMID 42733065
LZ901 vaccine efficacy against PHN, pain ≥90 days after zoster onset 89.0% (41.3–99.4); 1 vs 8 cases Same Same trial, alternative PHN definition PMID 42733065
Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness against PHN, immune-mediated inflammatory diseases 33.6% (11.7–50.0) 26 studies; 2,238,638 patients with IMIDs Systematic review/meta-analysis; abstract only; number of PHN-contributing studies not stated PMID 42896729
Recombinant zoster vaccine against zoster, IMIDs: trial efficacy vs real-world effectiveness 90.5% (69.1–97.1) vs 59.0% (49.8–66.5) Same Same PMID 42896729
PHN cumulative incidence after zoster in primary care 8.6% 735 adults with coded zoster, five Portuguese family health units, 2013–2023 Retrospective multicentre record review PMID 42874035
Chronic postsurgical pain after thyroidectomy, 3 months 18.4% 16 studies; 1,538 patients Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 42854063
“Neuropathic pain” after thyroidectomy, 3 / 6 months 40.9% (19.5–62.3; I²=97.51%) / 9.5% (6.3–12.6) Same Same; see caveat — includes yes/no hypesthesia/paresthesia questions PMID 42854063
Neuropathic pain at 3 months, perioperative IV lidocaine vs control RR 0.60 (0.43–0.85); I²=2% 5 RCTs (of 18 in the review; 1,391 patients overall) Meta-analysis; trim-and-fill imputed 3 studies PMID 42865434
Trigeminal neuralgia incidence 25.33/100,000 person-years (11.87–54.02) 17 studies; >170 million participants; 1945–2024 Random-effects systematic review/meta-regression PMID 41517817
Trigeminal neuralgia annual prevalence 45.38/100,000 (15.41–133.61) Same Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 41517817
Central post-stroke pain 11% (7–18) 69 eligible papers; stroke at any location Systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 32451951
Central post-stroke pain present at stroke onset 26% (18–35) Patients who developed central post-stroke pain Meta-analysis of timing PMID 32451951
Central post-stroke pain developing within 1 month 31% (22–42) Same Meta-analysis of timing PMID 32451951
Central post-stroke pain developing 1–12 months 41% (33.9–49.0) Same Meta-analysis of timing PMID 32451951
Any pain in multiple sclerosis 63% (55–70) 17 studies; 5,319 adults with definite MS Systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 23318126
Neuropathic extremity pain in multiple sclerosis 26% (7–53) Adults with definite MS Syndrome-specific meta-analysis PMID 23318126
Neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis, updated 26.8% 24 studies at low risk of bias Systematic review/meta-analysis PMID 37777076
Neuropathic pain in secondary-progressive MS 40.3% MS cohorts in updated synthesis Clinical-type subgroup PMID 37777076
Neuropathic pain in primary-progressive MS 15.6% Same Clinical-type subgroup PMID 37777076
Neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis, NeuPSIG-graded synthesis 22.3% (17.3–27.3) 32 papers; search to 2025-10-14 Random-effects meta-analysis; I²=97.1% PMID 42678174
—possible neuropathic pain 22.0% (16.0–28.0) 26 studies; 5,399 people with MS Grade-stratified; I²=97.4% PMID 42678174
—probable neuropathic pain 23.7% (19.4–28.0) 1 study; 374 people with MS Single study; not pooled PMID 42678174
—definite neuropathic pain 23.4% (11.1–35.8) 5 studies; 2,064 people with MS Grade-stratified; I²=92.1% PMID 42678174
Phantom-limb pain after combat amputation 57% (46–68) 31 studies; 14,738 military personnel Random-effects systematic review/meta-analysis; I² 94–98% PMID 38112578
Residual-limb pain after combat amputation 61% (50–71) Same Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 38112578
Chronic neuropathic pain after combat injury 26% (10–54) Same Random-effects meta-analysis PMID 38112578
Neuropathic pain in burn scars at discharge 66.5% 915 Burn Model System participants National longitudinal database analysis PMID 37916448
Postsurgical neuropathic fraction—breast 68% Persistent-pain cases 281-study review PMID 23273105
—thoracic 66% Persistent-pain cases Same PMID 23273105
—hernia 31% Persistent-pain cases Same PMID 23273105
—arthroplasty 6% Persistent-pain cases Same PMID 23273105
SNRI NNT for 50% relief 6.4 (5.2–8.4) Neuropathic-pain RCTs NeuPSIG meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Gabapentin NNT 7.2 (5.9–9.21) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Pregabalin NNT 7.7 (6.5–9.4) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25575710
Capsaicin 8% NNT 10.6 (7.4–19.0) Same Meta-analysis PMID 25575710
TCA NNT / NNH, 2025 revision 4.6 (3.2–7.7) / 17.1 (11.4–33.6) 313 placebo-controlled trials; 48,789 adults; search to 2024-02-12 NeuPSIG meta-analysis; responder outcome; moderate certainty PMID 40252663
α2δ-ligand NNT / NNH, 2025 revision 8.9 (7.4–11.1) / 26.2 (20.4–36.5) Same Same; moderate certainty PMID 40252663
SNRI NNT / NNH, 2025 revision 7.4 (5.6–10.9) / 13.9 (10.9–19.0) Same Same; moderate certainty PMID 40252663
Capsaicin 8% patch NNT, 2025 revision 13.2 (7.6–50.8) Same Same; moderate certainty PMID 40252663
Botulinum toxin A NNT, 2025 revision 2.7 (1.8–9.61) Same Same; moderate certainty PMID 40252663
Opioid NNT / NNH, 2025 revision 5.9 (4.1–10.7) / 15.4 (10.8–24.0) Same Same; low certainty PMID 40252663
rTMS NNT, 2025 revision 4.2 (2.3–28.3) Same; 29 neuromodulation trials in total Same; low certainty PMID 40252663
Lidocaine 5% plaster NNT, 2025 revision 14.5 (7.8–108.2) Same Same; very low certainty PMID 40252663
Neuropathic-pain RCT reports with a blinding assessment 12.5% (36/288) Pharmacotherapy and non-invasive neuromodulation RCT papers Descriptive review PMID 42751722
Duloxetine diabetic pain NNT 5 (4–7) 12-week trials Cochrane review PMID 24385423
Opioid mean pain difference −0.69/10 (−0.82 to −0.56) 96 chronic-pain RCTs Meta-analysis PMID 30561481
Opioid mean function difference +2.04/100 (1.41–2.68) Same Meta-analysis PMID 30561481
Health utility range 0.15–0.61 24 neuropathic-pain studies Meta-analysis PMID 20227832

Known conflicts and caveats

  • Screening prevalence is not probable/definite neuropathic pain.
  • CIPN estimates include painful and painless neuropathy and mix agents.
  • The 2014 and 2026 CIPN syntheses are not interchangeable: the 2026 estimate counts only neuropathy persisting ≥3 months after chemotherapy completion, pools 197 heterogeneous studies (I²=99%; small-study asymmetry; GRADE very low) and shows no decline between 12–24 months and ≥24 months. Both are kept; neither is a painful-CIPN prevalence.
  • The 26.2% painful-diabetic-neuropathy figure and the GLP-1 receptor agonist odds ratio come from one cross-sectional sample of 500 people; the odds ratio is an adjusted association, not a treatment effect.
  • The 46.7% painful-diabetic-neuropathy estimate is conditional on already having diabetic peripheral neuropathy; case-finding instruments significantly changed prevalence, so it is not interchangeable with prevalence among all people with diabetes.
  • The updated SCI estimate used valid classification systems but retained extreme heterogeneity (I²=96.2%); classification system significantly affected prevalence and the 2016 and 2025 estimates should remain side by side.
  • The CIPN fall estimate was a hypothesis generated after data collection in a small, predominantly female cancer cohort; it supports risk surveillance but not a causal effect estimate for every neurotoxic regimen.
  • Postsurgical percentages are conditional on persistent pain, not incidence among all operations.
  • Zoster-vaccine effectiveness estimates are observational, geographically concentrated and rated very low certainty; the recombinant-vaccine estimate was a two-study post-hoc analysis.
  • Recombinant-vaccine PHN estimates conflict by synthesis: the 2026 review of immunocompetent adults ≥50 reports 91.2% efficacy (moderate certainty), whereas a 2024 pooled-RCT meta-analysis cited on the postherpetic page found no statistically significant PHN difference (PMID 39399936). PHN events are few in both. The LZ901 rows show the same trial yielding 24 or 8 placebo PHN cases depending on the definition.
  • Trigeminal-neuralgia estimates span eight decades and very wide intervals; changing diagnostic criteria and incorporation of imaging are plausible sources of temporal variation.
  • Central post-stroke pain can appear after discharge: the timing categories are conditional on developing the syndrome and are not incidence risks for all stroke survivors.
  • The two multiple-sclerosis neuropathic-pain syntheses disagree (26.8% in 2023 versus 22.3% in 2026); the later authors attribute part of the gap to the earlier review's inclusion of studies restricted to people with MS who had pain. The published abstract of the 2026 paper prints the lower bound of the definite-grade interval as 1.11; the full text (PMC13532436) gives 11.1, which is used here.
  • The 2025 NeuPSIG NNTs are not directly comparable with the 2015 values: the 2025 analysis pools α2δ-ligands as a class, excludes enriched-enrolment randomized-withdrawal trials and uses a different trial set. Both sets are retained.
  • Multiple-sclerosis pain estimates separate all pain from neuropathic pain; the updated clinical-type and sex subgroup estimates should not be interpreted as causal because definitions and study composition vary.
  • Combat-amputation estimates have I² of 94–98%, inconsistent case definitions and limited reporting of duration and impact; they are not automatically generalizable to civilian amputation.
  • Burn-scar neuropathic pain was self-reported in a rehabilitation database; 66.5% is a discharge-time cohort estimate, not a population incidence rate.
  • The thyroidectomy “neuropathic pain” estimate is not neuropathic pain under any grading system: the review's full text states that most studies used DN2/DN4 “or direct questions regarding local hypesthesia or paresthesia”, and the highest contributing proportion (81.6%) came from a telephone question about hypesthesia. It exceeds the review's own chronic-postsurgical-pain estimate (18.4%) for that reason, and should not be compared with neuropathic-pain incidence elsewhere.
  • Zoster-vaccine PHN protection depends on immune status: 33.6% effectiveness in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (2026) sits beside 91.2% efficacy in immunocompetent adults ≥50; the IMID figure mixes trial and observational designs, and the abstract does not give the PHN denominator.
  • The CIPN 37%/31% figures are cross-sectional at a median 12 months after treatment in a cohort that was 66% female; they are not incidence estimates, and the dose-modification proportion depends on local oncology practice.
  • CryoPac's end-of-treatment figures come from 217 of 268 randomized participants with unequal analyzed arms; they are not intention-to-treat estimates.
  • NNTs pool etiologies, doses and short trial durations.
  • Utility values reflect instrument, condition and severity; they should not be pooled with symptom prevalence.