Skip to content

MASLD — quick-reference statistics

Every figure carries its source, year, population and method. Conflicting estimates are shown side by side and never averaged. All PMIDs were verified against live PubMed queries on 2026-09-02; ClinicalTrials.gov figures came from the v2 API on the same date.

Read the "known conflicts and caveats" section at the end before quoting anything here in isolation.


1. Prevalence — general adult population

Estimate (95% CI) Definition Method Study period n Source
30.05% (27.88–32.32) NAFLD 92 population-based studies, random effects 1990–2019 9,361,716 Younossi 2023, PMID 36626630
30.69% (28.40–33.09) NAFLD, ultrasound-defined subset of the above 1990–2019 PMID 36626630
32.4% (29.9–34.9) NAFLD, imaging-diagnosed 72 studies, 17 countries to May 2021 1,030,160 Riazi 2022, PMID 35798021
29.8% (28.6–31.1) NAFLD 245 studies to Mar 2020 5,399,254 Le 2022, PMID 34890795
30.2% (28.7–31.7) NAFLD 479 studies, 38 countries to May 2023 78,001,755 Amini-Salehi 2024, PMID 39094335
~38% NAFLD narrative review to 2023 Wong 2023, PMID 37169151
30–40% MASLD narrative review to 2025 Tilg 2026, PMID 41212550

United States, elastography-based

Metric Estimate (95% CI) Survey Source
All steatotic liver disease 34.2% (31.9–36.5) NHANES 2017–Mar 2020, n=7,367 Lee 2024, PMID 37732946
MASLD 31.3% (29.2–33.4) same PMID 37732946
MetALD 2.0% (1.6–2.9) same PMID 37732946
ALD 0.7% (0.5–0.9) same PMID 37732946
Etiology-specific/cryptogenic 0.03% (0.01–0.08) same PMID 37732946
All SLD, age-adjusted (CAP ≥285 dB/m) 35.0% (33.4–36.7) NHANES 2017–2023, n=12,199 Kim 2025, PMID 39610192
MASLD, age-adjusted 31.9% (30.4–33.4) same PMID 39610192
MetALD, age-adjusted 2.2% (1.8–2.6) same PMID 39610192
ALD, age-adjusted 0.8% (0.6–1.1) same PMID 39610192
NAFLD / MAFLD / MASLD, same sample 18.5% / 19.3% / 20.8% NHANES III, n=7,519 (ultrasound) Song 2024, PMID 38293788
MASLD / MetALD / ALD 30% / 2.3% / 1.0% NHANES III, n=9,939 (ultrasound) Sripongpun 2024, PMID 39290401

Regional (NAFLD unless stated)

Region Prevalence (95% CI) Source
Latin America 44.37% (30.66–59.00) Younossi 2023, PMID 36626630
Middle East & North Africa 36.53% (28.63–45.22) PMID 36626630
South Asia 33.83% (22.91–46.79) PMID 36626630
South-East Asia 33.07% (18.99–51.03) PMID 36626630
North America 31.20% (25.86–37.08) PMID 36626630
East Asia 29.71% (25.96–33.76) PMID 36626630
Asia-Pacific 28.02% (24.69–31.60) PMID 36626630
Western Europe 25.10% (20.55–30.28) PMID 36626630
South America 35.7% (34.0–37.5), 3 studies Le 2022, PMID 34890795
Asia, pooled (237 studies) 29.62% (28.13–31.15) Li 2019, PMID 30902670
Australia 16.1% (9.0–24.8) Amini-Salehi 2024, PMID 39094335
MENA, MASLD adults ≥20 y, 2021 41.0% (from 37.1% in 2010) Younossi 2025, PMID 40919841

By subgroup

Population Prevalence (95% CI) Source
Type 2 diabetes 65.33% (62.35–68.18), 123 studies, N=2,224,144 Younossi 2024, PMID 38521116
Type 2 diabetes 65.04% (61.79–68.15), 156 studies, N=1,832,125 Cho 2023, PMID 37491159
Overweight 69.99% (65.40–74.21) Quek 2023, PMID 36400097
Obesity 75.27% (70.90–79.18) PMID 36400097
Men vs women 39.7% (36.6–42.8) vs 25.6% (22.3–28.8), p<0.0001 Riazi 2022, PMID 35798021
Men vs women 36.6% (34.7–38.4) vs 25.5% (23.9–27.1) PMID 39094335
Children, general population 13% (9–18) Lee 2024, PMID 38771552
Children with obesity 47% (41–53) PMID 38771552
Children, general population 14.3% (10.3–18.8) PMID 39094335
Children with obesity 38.0% (31.5–44.7) PMID 39094335
Lean, as fraction of the NAFLD population 19.2% (15.9–23.0) Ye 2020, PMID 32413340
Non-obese, as fraction of NAFLD 40.8% (36.6–45.1) PMID 32413340
Lean NAFLD in the general population 5.1% (3.7–7.0) PMID 32413340
Non-obese NAFLD in the general population 12.1% (9.3–15.6) PMID 32413340
Lean-MAFLD in the general population 1.94% (1.10–3.39), I²=98.7% Cheah 2025, PMID 40087205
T2D among people with NAFLD 28.3% (25.2–31.6), 395 studies Cao 2024, PMID 38448943
T2D among people with MAFLD 26.2% (23.9–28.6) PMID 38448943

2. Incidence

Estimate (95% CI) Population Source
46.9 per 1,000 person-years (36.4–57.5) 16 studies, 5 countries, N=381,765 Riazi 2022, PMID 35798021
46.13 per 1,000 PY (39.3–52.9) 63 studies, N=1,201,807 (26 China/HK, 22 Korea, 14 Japan) Le 2023, PMID 37040843
50.9 per 1,000 PY (44.8–57.4) Asia, 237 studies Li 2019, PMID 30902670
24.6 per 1,000 PY (13.4–39.2) non-obese population without NAFLD at baseline Ye 2020, PMID 32413340
Men 59.4 vs women 36.7 per 1,000 PY (p=0.0013) same as Le 2023 PMID 37040843
Obese 86.7 vs non-obese 29.6 per 1,000 PY (p<0.0001) same PMID 37040843
Smokers 80.4 vs non-smokers 46.9 per 1,000 PY (p=0.046) same PMID 37040843
Incident T2D in NAFLD: 24.6 per 1,000 PY (20.7–29.2) 395 studies Cao 2024, PMID 38448943

3. Severity distribution

Metric Estimate (95% CI) Population Source
Advanced fibrosis, general population 3.3% (2.4–4.2) 46 studies, 21 countries, ~8 million Zamani 2025, PMID 39209202
Cirrhosis, general population 1.3% (0.9–1.7) same PMID 39209202
Advanced fibrosis among people with SLD, pre-COVID 7.4% (CAP ≥285) NHANES Kim 2025, PMID 39610192
Advanced fibrosis among people with SLD, COVID era 9.8% (p=0.039 vs pre-COVID) NHANES PMID 39610192
High-risk NASH (NAS≥4, F≥2), FAST ≥0.35 5.8% age-adjusted NHANES 2017–2018, n=4,218 Vilar-Gomez 2023, PMID 34958922
High-risk NASH, FAST ≥0.67 1.2% age-adjusted same PMID 34958922
High-risk NASH in T2D 8.7%–22.5% (cut-off dependent) same PMID 34958922
NASH in overweight 33.50% (28.38–39.04) Quek 2023 PMID 36400097
NASH in obesity 33.67% (28.45–39.31) PMID 36400097
F2–4 in overweight with NAFLD 20.27% (11.32–33.62) PMID 36400097
F3–4 in overweight with NAFLD 6.65% (4.35–10.01) PMID 36400097
F3–4 in obese with NAFLD 6.85% (3.85–11.90) PMID 36400097
NASH in T2D (biopsy subset) 66.44% (56.61–75.02) 12 studies, N=2,733 Younossi 2024, PMID 38521116
F2–4 in T2D with NAFLD 40.78% (24.24–59.70) / 35.54% (19.56–55.56) PMID 38521116 / PMID 37491159
F3–4 in T2D with NAFLD 15.49% (6.99–30.99) / 14.95% (11.03–19.95) PMID 38521116 / PMID 37491159
Advanced fibrosis, prospectively assessed, age ≥50 with T2D 14% n=501, MRI-PDFF + MRE + VCTE Ajmera 2023, PMID 36410554
Cirrhosis, same cohort 6% same PMID 36410554
Advanced fibrosis (≥F3) in biopsy-confirmed MASLD 35% Global-MASLD, n=17,792, 41 countries Younossi 2026, PMID 41231627
NASH in lean/non-obese NAFLD 39.0% (24.1–56.3) Ye 2020 PMID 32413340
Significant fibrosis in lean/non-obese 29.2% (21.9–37.9) PMID 32413340
Cirrhosis in lean/non-obese 3.2% (1.5–5.7) PMID 32413340

4. Progression and regression

Metric Estimate (95% CI) Source
Fibrosis progression from F0, MASL 0.07 stages/yr (0.02–0.11) = 1 stage per 14.3 y (9.1–50.0) Singh 2015, PMID 24768810
Fibrosis progression from F0, MASH 0.14 stages/yr (0.07–0.21) = 1 stage per 7.1 y (4.8–14.3) PMID 24768810
Paired-biopsy trajectory 33.6% progressed, 43.1% stable, 22.3% regressed PMID 24768810
Progression to cirrhosis 3–5% of patients, usually >20 years Hagström 2024, PMID 39243773
Fibrosis progression events 49.0 per 1,000 PY Le 2024, PMID 38281814
Progression to LSM ≥10 kPa, over mean 4.4 y 29% of those at risk Gawrieh 2024, PMID 38762169
Regression to LSM <10 kPa 44% of those at risk PMID 38762169
First decompensation in cACLD, 5 y 3.5% (3.0–4.1) Pennisi 2025, PMID 40550340
Further decompensation after the first, 5 y 43.9% (37.2–50.2) PMID 40550340
Decompensation, CSPH present, 5 y 30.7% Paternostro 2024, PMID 38823501
Decompensation, no CSPH, 5 y 9.4% PMID 38823501

5. Mortality and events

Rates per 1,000 person-years

Cause Unselected NAFLD T2D with NAFLD Referral-enriched cohorts Asian biopsy registry
All-cause 12.60 (6.68–23.67) 16.79 (10.64–26.40) 14.6 5.34 (4.02–7.08)
Cardiac 4.20 (1.34–7.05) 4.19 (1.34–7.05) 4.53
Extrahepatic cancer 2.83 (0.78–4.88) 6.10* 4.53
Liver-specific 0.92 (0.00–2.21) 2.15* 3.10 2.34 (1.52–3.58)
Source Younossi 2023, PMID 36626630 Younossi 2024, PMID 38521116 Le 2024, PMID 38281814 Fujii 2023, PMID 35051649

*The published confidence intervals for these two figures do not contain their point estimates as reported in the source abstract; the point estimates are quoted as published and the intervals are omitted.

Fibrosis-stage-specific mortality

Stage All-cause MRR (Dulai 2017) Liver-related MRR (Dulai 2017) All-cause HR (Ng 2023) Liver-related HR (Ng 2023) Death/transplant HR (Angulo 2015)
F1 1.58 (1.19–2.11) 1.41 (0.17–11.95) 1.88 (1.28–2.77)
F2 2.52 (1.85–3.42) 9.57 (1.67–54.93) 1.46 (1.08–1.98) 4.07 (1.44–11.5) 2.89 (1.93–4.33)
F3 3.48 (2.51–4.83) 16.69 (2.92–95.36) 1.96 (1.41–2.72) 7.59 (2.80–20.5) 3.76 (2.40–5.89)
F4 6.40 (4.11–9.95) 42.30 (3.51–510.34) 3.66 (2.65–5.05) 15.1 (5.27–43.4) 10.9 (6.06–19.62)
Sources PMID 28130788 PMID 28130788 PMID 35513235 PMID 35513235 PMID 25935633

Taylor 2020 (PMID 32027911) gives unadjusted F0-vs-F4 risk ratios of 3.42 (2.63–4.46) all-cause, 11.13 (4.15–29.84) liver-related, 5.42 (1.05–27.89) transplant and 12.78 (6.85–23.85) liver-related events.

Absolute mortality

Metric Value Source
All-cause mortality at 1/5/10 y, F0–F2 0.1% / 3.3% / 7.7% Ng 2023, PMID 35513235
All-cause mortality at 1/5/10 y, F4 0.3% / 20.6% / 41.5% PMID 35513235
20-y cumulative major adverse liver outcomes: population / F0 / F3 2% / 3% / 35% Akbari 2024, PMID 38293684
5-y mortality, biopsy-confirmed MASLD overall 2.1% Younossi 2026, PMID 41231627
5-y mortality, cirrhosis 8.3% PMID 41231627
Median survival from first decompensation to death or transplant 2.0 years Noureddin 2024, PMID 38571305
All-cause mortality, biopsy NAFLD vs matched controls 28.6 vs 16.9 per 1,000 PY; aHR 1.93 (1.86–2.00) Simon 2021, PMID 33037056
…by stage (aHR vs controls) steatosis 1.71; non-fibrotic NASH 2.14; non-cirrhotic fibrosis 2.44; cirrhosis 3.79 PMID 33037056
Excess mortality contributors (aHR) extrahepatic cancer 2.16; cirrhosis 18.15; CVD 1.35; HCC 11.12 PMID 33037056

Adverse-event incidence per 1,000 person-years (79 studies, N=1,377,466)

Event Rate
Any liver-related event 24.3
Cirrhosis 10.9
Liver transplant 12.0
Hepatocellular carcinoma 3.39
Incident CVD 24.77
Renal impairment 30.3
Depression/anxiety 29.1
Non-liver cancer 10.5
Incident diabetes 19.0
Incident hypertension 25.8
Incident dyslipidaemia 26.4
Incident metabolic syndrome 25.4

Source: Le 2024, PMID 38281814. Baseline composition: 21.97% cirrhosis, 58.85% biopsy-proven NASH — a referral-enriched population.


6. Extrahepatic risk

Outcome Effect (95% CI) Population Source
Fatal or non-fatal CVD HR 1.45 (1.31–1.61), I²=86.18% 36 studies, 5,802,226 people, 99,668 events Mantovani 2021, PMID 34555346
…with advanced fibrosis HR 2.50 (1.68–3.72) same PMID 34555346
MACE, biopsy cohort 24.3 vs 16.0 per 1,000 PY; aHR 1.63 (1.56–1.70) Sweden, n=10,422 vs 46,517 Simon 2022, PMID 34489307
…IHD / CHF / stroke / CV death aHR 1.64 / 1.75 / 1.58 / 1.37 same PMID 34489307
…cirrhosis stratum aHR 2.15 (1.77–2.61) same PMID 34489307
CVD, national screening cohort HR 1.38 (1.37–1.39) for MASLD/related SLD Korea, 8,808,494 followed 12.3 y, 272,863 events Lee 2024, PMID 37907259
…MASLD / MetALD / other combined 1.39 (1.38–1.40) / 1.28 (1.26–1.30) / 1.30 (1.26–1.34) same PMID 37907259
Incident CKD stage ≥3 HR 1.43 (1.33–1.54), I²=60.7% 13 studies, 1,222,032 people, 33,840 events Mantovani 2022, PMID 33303564
GI cancers (oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, colorectal) ~1.5–2-fold 10 studies, 182,202 people, 8,485 cancers Mantovani 2022, PMID 33685968
Lung, breast, gynaecological, urinary cancers ~1.2–1.5-fold same PMID 33685968

NASH CRN prospective cohort, events per 100 person-years by stage (n=1,773, median 4 y)

Event F0–F2 F3 F4
All-cause death 0.32 0.89 1.76
Variceal haemorrhage 0.00 0.06 0.70
Ascites 0.04 0.52 1.20
Encephalopathy 0.02 0.75 2.39
Hepatocellular carcinoma 0.04 0.34 0.14
Incident type 2 diabetes 4.45 7.53
>40% eGFR decline 0.97 2.98

Source: Sanyal 2021, PMID 34670043. Cardiac events and non-hepatic cancers did not differ across stages.


7. Hepatocellular carcinoma

Metric Value Source
MASH cirrhosis, annual HCC incidence 0.5–2.6% per year Huang 2021, PMID 33349658
Non-cirrhotic MASLD 0.1–1.3 per 1,000 patient-years PMID 33349658
NAFLD overall (pooled cohorts) 3.39 per 1,000 PY Le 2024, PMID 38281814
Asia (pooled) 1.8 per 1,000 PY (0.8–3.1) Li 2019, PMID 30902670
Proportion of all HCC attributable to NAFLD 15.1% (11.9–18.9) Tan 2022, PMID 35255263
Single-MAFLD as sole aetiology of HCC 12.4% (8.3–17.3) Crane 2024, PMID 38623613
Total MAFLD (sole or contributory) in HCC 48.7% (34.5–63.0) PMID 38623613
Non-cirrhotic at HCC diagnosis: NAFLD vs other 38.5% (27.9–50.2) vs 14.6% (8.7–23.4), p<0.0001 Tan 2022, PMID 35255263
Underwent surveillance: NAFLD vs other 32.8% (12.0–63.7) vs 55.7% (24.0–83.3), p<0.0001 PMID 35255263
Overall survival vs non-NAFLD HCC HR 1.05 (0.92–1.20), p=0.43 PMID 35255263
Disease-free survival vs non-NAFLD HCC HR 0.79 (0.63–0.99), p=0.044 PMID 35255263
Liver-cancer risk vs no SLD (UK Biobank, n=464,556) MetALD 1.70 (1.37–2.09); MASLD 1.91 (1.66–2.21); MAFLD 2.01 (1.76–2.29); ALD 3.16 (2.54–3.93); MASLD+viral 22.0 (10.8–44.4) Zeng 2025, PMID 39949980

8. Treatment effect sizes (histological endpoints)

Intervention MASH resolution, no fibrosis worsening ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement Comparator Source
Semaglutide 2.4 mg, 72 wk 62.9% vs 34.3% (Δ28.7, 21.1–36.2) 36.8% vs 22.4% (Δ14.4, 7.5–21.3) placebo PMID 40305708
Tirzepatide 15 mg, 52 wk 62% vs 10% (Δ53, 37–69) 51% vs 30% (Δ21, 1–42) placebo PMID 38856224
Survodutide 4.8 mg, 48 wk 62% vs 14% 36% vs 22% placebo PMID 38847460
Lanifibranor 1200 mg, 24 wk 49% vs 22% 48% vs 29% placebo PMID 34670042
Efruxifermin 50 mg, 96 wk (mITT) 49% vs 19% (Δ31, 12–49) placebo PMID 40818852
Efruxifermin 50 mg, 96 wk (biopsied) 75% vs 24% (Δ52, 31–73) placebo PMID 40818852
Pegozafermin 30 mg, 24 wk 23% vs 2% 26% vs 7% (Δ19, 5–32) placebo PMID 37356033
Resmetirom 100 mg, 52 wk 29.9% vs 9.7% 25.9% vs 14.2% placebo PMID 38324483
Denifanstat 50 mg, 52 wk 26% vs 11% (Δ13.0, 0.7–25.3) placebo PMID 39396529
Obeticholic acid 25 mg, 18 mo 12% vs 8% (not met) 23% vs 12% (p=0.0002) placebo PMID 31813633
Cenicriviroc 150 mg, 1 y 8% vs 6% (p=0.49) 20% vs 10% (p=0.02) placebo PMID 28833331
Selonsertib, 48 wk (STELLAR-3/4) 10–14% vs 13% (both negative) placebo PMID 32147362
Vitamin E 800 IU, 96 wk 43% vs 19% NASH improvement (p=0.001) no improvement (p=0.24) placebo PMID 20427778
Pioglitazone 45 mg, 18 mo (T2D/prediabetes) 51% resolution (Δ32, 13–51) fibrosis score −0.5 (p=0.039) placebo PMID 27322798
Lifestyle, ≥10% weight loss 90% 45% regression within-cohort subgroup PMID 25865049
Lifestyle, pooled meta-analysis 0.12 (0.08–0.16); 0.25 (0.20–0.30) if >3% weight loss 0.17 (0.13–0.22) PMID 41510965
Bariatric surgery, RYGB / sleeve, 1 y 56% / 57% vs 16% lifestyle lifestyle + best medical care PMID 37088093
Bariatric surgery, 5 y 84% (73.1–92.2) 70.2% decreased; 56% fibrosis-free single-arm PMID 32553765

Placebo-arm response, for calibration

Trial Placebo MASH resolution Placebo fibrosis improvement
ENLIVEN (pegozafermin) 2% 7%
MAESTRO-NASH (resmetirom) 9.7% 14.2%
SYNERGY-NASH (tirzepatide) 10% 30%
Denifanstat phase 2b 11%
Survodutide phase 2 14% 22%
HARMONY 96 wk (efruxifermin) 19%
NATIVE (lanifibranor) 22% 29%
ESSENCE (semaglutide) 34.3% 22.4%

9. Non-invasive test performance

Test Target AUROC Population Source
LSM-VCTE advanced fibrosis 0.85 IPD meta-analysis, 37 studies, n=5,735 Mózes 2022, PMID 34001645
FIB-4 advanced fibrosis 0.76 same PMID 34001645
NFS advanced fibrosis 0.73 same PMID 34001645
VCTE significant / advanced fibrosis / cirrhosis 0.83 / 0.85 / 0.89 82 studies, n=14,609 Selvaraj 2021, PMID 33991635
MRE significant / advanced fibrosis / cirrhosis / NASH 0.91 / 0.92 / 0.90 / 0.83 same PMID 33991635
Point SWE significant / advanced fibrosis / cirrhosis 0.86 / 0.89 / 0.90 same PMID 33991635
2D-SWE significant / advanced fibrosis / cirrhosis 0.75 / 0.72 / 0.88 same PMID 33991635
CAP S≥1 / S≥2 / S3 0.87 / 0.77 / 0.70 n=404, prospective Eddowes 2019, PMID 30689971
LSM F≥2 / F≥3 / F4 0.77 / 0.80 / 0.89 same PMID 30689971
ELF advanced fibrosis 0.85 (0.79–0.92) screening cohort, n=3,378 Kjaergaard 2023, PMID 37088311
FIB-4 (same cohort) advanced fibrosis 0.73 (0.64–0.81) same PMID 37088311
NFS (same cohort) advanced fibrosis 0.66 (0.57–0.76) same PMID 37088311
ADAPT (PRO-C3) advanced fibrosis 0.86 / 0.87 derivation n=150, validation n=281 Daniels 2019, PMID 30014517
NIS4 at-risk NASH 0.81 (0.78–0.84) NASH CRN DB2, n=1,073 Sanyal 2023, PMID 37679433
FAST at-risk NASH 0.80 (0.76–0.85) derivation; 0.85 (0.83–0.87) pooled external n=350 + 1,026 Newsome 2020, PMID 32027858
MAF-5 LSM ≥12 kPa 0.86 training / 0.85 validation n=21,797 van Kleef 2024, PMID 38513745
LiverPRO TE ≥8 kPa 0.80 (0.78–0.82) DECIDE, n=6,468 Lindvig 2025, PMID 39674225
SAFE ≥F2 vs F0/1 ≥0.80 NASH CRN n=676 + testing sets Sripongpun 2023, PMID 35477908
ANTICIPATE-NASH liver-related events in F3–F4 C statistic 0.93 (vs histology 0.67) n=699; validated n=1,396 Aceituno 2026, PMID 41212130

Global variation (G-MASLD, n=17,792, 41 countries; Younossi 2026, PMID 41100867)

Test Pooled AUC Lowest region Highest region
FIB-4 (advanced fibrosis) 0.80 (0.79–0.81) Latin America 0.75 (0.71–0.79) MENA 0.84 (0.82–0.87)
ELF (advanced fibrosis) 0.77 (0.76–0.79) Europe 0.72 (0.69–0.76) North America 0.80 (0.78–0.82)
LSM (advanced fibrosis) 0.84 (0.83–0.85) North America 0.78 (0.76–0.81)
FAST 0.75 (0.74–0.76)
Agile 3+ 0.87 (0.86–0.88)
Agile 4 (cirrhosis) 0.90 (0.89–0.91) North America 0.85 (0.83–0.87) MENA 0.96 (0.94–0.98)

Prognostic performance (5-year tAUC; Mózes 2023, PMID 37290471, n=2,518)

Modality tAUC (95% CI)
LSM-VCTE 0.76 (0.70–0.83)
FIB-4 0.74 (0.64–0.82)
Histology 0.72 (0.62–0.81)
NFS 0.70 (0.63–0.80)

10. Histological scoring reproducibility

Feature Inter-rater weighted κ (NASH CRN, adult cases)
Fibrosis 0.84
Steatosis 0.79
Injury (ballooning) 0.56
Lobular inflammation 0.45
Diagnostic category 0.61

Source: Kleiner 2005, PMID 15915461. With the SAF score and FLIP algorithm applied, concordance with a reference reading rose from 77% to 97% (experienced readers, κ 0.54→0.66) and from 42% to 75% (less experienced, κ 0.35→0.61) (Bedossa 2014, PMID 24753132).


11. Burden projections

Projection Horizon Result Source
Markov, USA 2015→2030 NAFLD 83.1 M→100.9 M (+21%); NASH 16.52 M→27.00 M (+63%); decompensated cirrhosis +168% to 105,430/yr; HCC +137% to 12,240/yr; liver deaths +178% to 78,300/yr; ~800,000 excess liver deaths Estes 2018, PMID 28802062
Markov, 8 countries 2016→2030 NAFLD cases +0–30%; NASH prevalence +15–56%; liver mortality and advanced liver disease more than double Estes 2018, PMID 29886156
Agent-based, US adults 2020→2050 MASLD 33.7% (86.3 M)→41.4% (121.9 M); MASH 14.9 M→23.2 M; MASH with F≥2 6.7 M→11.7 M; HCC 11,483→22,440/yr; transplant 1,717→6,720/yr; liver deaths 30,500 (1.0% of adult deaths)→95,300 (2.4%) Le 2025, PMID 39821400
Hierarchical Bayesian, global →2040 NAFLD prevalence 55.7% (from 38.9% in 2020); +2.16%/yr Le 2022, PMID 36117442
ARIMA, Asia →~2041 MASLD incidence +34% vs 1990; nine CKM conditions = 50.9% of Asian disease prevalence and 34.4% of deaths in 2021 Duo 2026, PMID 41643809

GBD context, age-standardised prevalence per 100,000, 2021, and 2010–2021 change

Condition Prevalence (95% UI) Change 2010–2021
Cirrhosis and other chronic liver disease 20,302.6 (18,845.2–21,791.9) +2.6%
MASLD 15,018.1 (13,756.5–16,361.4) +11.2%
Hepatitis B 3,583.6 (3,293.6–3,887.7) −20.4%
Hepatitis C 1,717.8 (1,385.5–2,075.3) −5.1%

Source: Feng 2025, PMID 40062742. Liver disease overall accounts for ~2 million deaths annually, 4% of all deaths, about two-thirds in men (Devarbhavi 2023, PMID 36990226).


12. Clinical trial landscape (ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API, 2026-09-02)

Query Count
query.cond=MASH OR NASH OR MASLD OR nonalcoholic steatohepatitis OR nonalcoholic fatty liver 2,011
…interventional and recruiting 178
query.cond=MASH OR NASH OR MASLD OR nonalcoholic steatohepatitis + AREA[Phase](PHASE3) 110

Largest active phase 3 programmes by enrolment: Eli Lilly master protocol (tirzepatide, retatrutide) NCT07165028 n=4,500; efruxifermin cirrhosis NCT06528314 n=2,150; efruxifermin non-cirrhotic NCT06215716 n=1,650; survodutide LIVERAGE NCT06632444 n=1,800; pemvidutide NCT07795164 n=1,800; MAESTRO-NASH NCT03900429 n=1,759; efimosfermin NCT07701993 n=1,740; survodutide LIVERAGE-Cirrhosis NCT06632457 n=1,590; pegozafermin NCT06318169 n=1,350; ESSENCE NCT04822181 n=1,205.

Terminated or withdrawn phase 3: REGENERATE (obeticholic acid) NCT02548351 n=2,477; RESOLVE-IT (elafibranor) NCT02704403 n=2,157; STELLAR-4 (selonsertib) NCT03053063 n=883; denifanstat NCT06594523 withdrawn at n=0.


13. Added in the 2026-09-02 depth pass

Every figure below carries source, population and method, as elsewhere in this file. All PMIDs were retrieved from live PubMed E-utilities queries on 2026-09-02.

13.1 Alcohol misclassification within "MASLD" (phosphatidylethanol vs self-report)

Measure Value Population / method Source
Median PEth, alcohol-recruited group 172 ng/mL (IQR 45–434) 1,482 at-risk adults 30–75 y, Odense, prospective, LC-MS Torp 2025, PMID 40945520
Median PEth, metabolically-recruited group 11 ng/mL (5–37) 1,442 adults, same cohort PMID 40945520
Under-reported intake by PEth 39.5% (alcohol group); 11.1% (metabolic group) same PMID 40945520
Classified MASLD by self-report, but PEth ≥20 ng/mL (MetALD/ALD range) 559 of 1,433 (39.0%) same PMID 40945520
Over-reporting (high self-report, PEth <20 ng/mL) 0.7% and 0.1% same PMID 40945520
PEth testing diagnostically redundant 812 of 2,042 with SLD (39.8%) decision tree on self-report + AUDIT-C PMID 40945520

13.2 Lean MASLD outcomes — the cardiovascular disagreement

Study CVD events, lean vs non-lean CVD mortality All-cause mortality Design
Wakabayashi 2024, PMID 38570344 aHR 0.73 (0.64–0.84) 2.9M Japanese health checkups
Huo 2026, PMID 41093635 HR 0.89 (0.83–0.95) HR 1.22 (1.05–1.41) HR 1.26 (1.14–1.39) UK Biobank + Kailuan + CKB, 5,030 lean, median 14.2 y
Souza 2024, PMID 39117942 adj HR 0.89 (0.77–1.02) ns HR 1.26 (0.89–1.78) ns 22 cohorts, >1M, 13.0% lean
Nso 2024, PMID 38599554 MACE OR 0.9 (0.7–1.2) ns OR 1.5 (1.2–1.8) OR 1.4, p=0.06 21 studies, 7,153 lean
Wongtrakul 2024, PMID 38278181 HR 1.61 (1.37–1.89), I²=77% 14 studies, 94,181, median 8.4 y
Al Ta'ani 2026, PMID 41614694 composite HR 1.21 (1.13–1.30); HF 1.23 (1.16–1.31); cerebrovascular 1.33 (1.24–1.43) HR 1.48 (1.38–1.59) TriNetX, 67,519 matched pairs, 7 y
Ghani 2025, PMID 40406910 higher after adjustment higher 75,921 US, 4.99% lean

Liver-related mortality, by contrast, is consistent: OR 3.56 (3.45–3.67) (PMID 40087205); RR 2.22 (1.57–3.15) and HR 2.26 (1.14–4.51) (PMID 39117942); HR 2.31 (1.54–3.46) (PMID 41093635).

13.3 Sampling and reader variability of liver biopsy

Quantity Value Source
Paired-core discordance, fibrosis stage ≥1 stage 41% of 51 patients Ratziu 2005, PMID 15940625
Bridging fibrosis on one core, mild/none on the other 6 of 17 (35%) PMID 15940625
Ballooning missed with a single core 24% of patients PMID 15940625
Negative predictive value of a single biopsy for NASH ≤0.74 PMID 15940625
Inter-reader κ, trial dataset: steatosis / fibrosis / ballooning / lobular inflammation 0.609 / 0.484 / 0.517 / 0.328 Davison 2020, PMID 32610115 (678 biopsies, 3 hepatopathologists)
Inter-reader κ, NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis 0.396 PMID 32610115
Inter-reader κ, fibrosis improvement without worsening NASH 0.366 PMID 32610115
Enrolled patients failing ≥1 other reader's entry criteria 46.3% PMID 32610115
Simulated power loss from endpoint unreliability >90% → as low as 40% PMID 32610115

13.4 Non-invasive test failure modes

Setting Finding Source
FIB-4 specificity for advanced fibrosis, age ≥65 35% (NFS 20%) McPherson 2017, PMID 27725647 (n=634, 5 age bands)
Re-derived thresholds, age ≥65 FIB-4 2.0 (sens 77%), NFS 0.12 (sens 80%), specificity 70% PMID 27725647
FIB-4/NFS/AST-ALT AUROC, age ≤35 0.52 / 0.52 / 0.60 PMID 27725647
Population screening: LSM ≥8 kPa with normal FIB-4 43% (NFS 31%) Graupera 2022, PMID 34971806 (5,129, 5 cohorts)
False-positive rate of elevated FIB-4/NFS 28–29% PMID 34971806
FIB-4 false-negative rate in diabetes 11% (NFS 2.5%) PMID 34971806
Ceiling of routine-variable models (superlearner over 23 variables) AUC 0.79 (0.73–0.84) FLINT; 0.74 (0.68–0.79) NHANES; SAFE equivalent Charu 2024, PMID 38687634
Baveno VII LSM ≥25 kPa rule-in PPV 92% overall; 0.67 in MASLD with obesity, rising to 0.83 with ANTICIPATE±NASH ≥75% Bañares 2026, PMID 41138818 (1,433 patients)
Baveno VII rule-out NPV 99% all aetiologies PMID 41138818
Spleen stiffness (100 Hz) added to Baveno VII: grey zone 60% → 15–20% Odriozola 2023, PMID 36912787
NICER (SSM+LSM+platelets+BMI) vs ANTICIPATE±NASH, AUC 0.889 vs 0.849 (p=0.022); validation 0.906 vs 0.863 (p=0.012) Jachs 2024, PMID 39326431
LITMUS: best AUC for at-risk NASH among 17 markers 0.81 (SomaSignal) — none reached the prespecified 0.80 threshold significantly Vali 2023, PMID 36958367 (n=966)
LITMUS: AUC for advanced fibrosis SomaSignal 0.90; ADAPT 0.85; LSM 0.83 PMID 36958367
LITMUS: screen-failure reduction with marker prescreening to 33%; NNT to find one true positive 4 (SomaSignal) to 9 (PRO-C3) PMID 36958367

13.5 Treatment: additions

Intervention Endpoint Result Source
Dapagliflozin 10 mg, 48 wk, biopsy MASH, n=154 MASH improvement without fibrosis worsening 53% vs 30%; RR 1.73 (1.16–2.58), p=0.006 Lin 2025, PMID 40467095
same MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening 23% vs 8%; RR 2.91 (1.22–6.97), p=0.01 PMID 40467095
same Fibrosis improvement without MASH worsening 45% vs 20%; RR 2.25 (1.35–3.75), p=0.001 PMID 40467095
Empagliflozin 10 mg, 20 wk, T2D+NAFLD, n=50 MRI-PDFF, between-group −4.0% (p<0.0001) Kuchay 2018, PMID 29895557
Empagliflozin 10 mg, 52 wk, non-diabetic MASLD, n=97 median MRI-PDFF change −2.49% vs −1.43% (p=0.025); resolution 44.9% vs 28.6% (p=0.094) Cheung 2024, PMID 38536017
ATLAS, 48 wk, F3–F4, n=392 ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement without worsening NASH placebo 11%; cilofexor+firsocostat 21% (p=0.17); all other arms 12–19%, all ns Loomba 2021, PMID 33169409
Resmetirom, qFibrosis (AI digital pathology), MAESTRO-NASH n=966 categorical ≥1-stage improvement over placebo +24.4% (80 mg), +22.3% (100 mg); continuous qFC −0.95 (−1.22 to −0.69) and −1.08 (−1.34 to −0.81) Schattenberg 2026, PMID 41895606
Metabolic surgery in compensated MASH cirrhosis (SPECCIAL), n=168, mean 10.0±4.5 y 15-y major adverse liver outcomes 20.9% (2.5–35.9) vs 46.4% (25.6–61.3); aHR 0.28 (0.12–0.64) Aminian 2025, PMID 39870816
same 15-y decompensation 15.6% (0–31.3) vs 30.7% (12.9–44.8); aHR 0.20 (0.06–0.68) PMID 39870816
Lanifibranor 800 mg, 24 wk, T2D+MASLD, n=38 IHTG (¹H-MRS) −44% vs −12%; LS mean difference −31% (−51 to −12); weight +2.7% Barb 2025, PMID 39824443

13.6 Incretin observational hepatic outcomes

Comparison Outcome Effect Source
Tirzepatide vs DPP-4i, T2D, 2 y, n=10,165 matched pairs incident major adverse liver outcome HR 0.53 (0.40–0.71) Henney 2025, PMID 40980971
Semaglutide vs DPP-4i, n=56,702 pairs same HR 0.81 (0.72–0.90) PMID 40980971
Liraglutide vs DPP-4i, n=8,301 pairs same HR 1.04 (0.79–1.36) — null PMID 40980971
GLP-1RA vs DPP-4i, MASLD+T2D, FIB-4 <2.67, 2,238 pairs progression to FIB-4 >2.67 HR 0.75 (0.65–0.87) Choi 2025, PMID 41250965
same cirrhosis/decompensation/HCC/transplant composite HR 0.98 (0.72–1.34) — null PMID 41250965
Semaglutide vs other GLP-1RA, MASLD, 20,384 pairs all-cause mortality aHR 0.68 (0.59–0.80) Kuo 2025, PMID 40536520
same major adverse liver outcomes aHR 0.79 (0.66–0.94) PMID 40536520
GLP-1RA class, 22 RCTs, n=2,258 lean mass change −0.86 kg (−1.30 to −0.42); ~25% of total weight lost Karakasis 2025, PMID 39719170

13.7 Alcohol use disorder after bariatric surgery

Procedure vs usual obesity care AUD Alcohol-related mortality Source
Gastric bypass (n=266) aHR 5.07 (3.11–8.25) sub-HR 6.18 (2.48–15.40) Sjöholm 2025, PMID 41066138 (SOS, median 25.2 y)
Vertical banded gastroplasty (n=1,365) aHR 2.28 (1.56–3.34) sub-HR 3.56 (1.79–7.08) PMID 41066138
Gastric banding (n=376) aHR 2.34 (1.37–4.01) sub-HR 2.52 (0.89–7.15), ns PMID 41066138
Any surgery (95% bypass) vs obese controls, Denmark, 13,430 vs 21,021, median 6.9 y AUD, IPTW HR 7.29 (5.06–9.48); year 1 HR 2.77 (1.39–5.53) Bramming 2021, PMID 33085738
Post-bariatric incretin vs non-incretin anti-obesity drug, 3,990 pairs new-onset AUD 2.4 vs 5.2 per 1,000 PY; HR 0.45 (0.25–0.81) Fakhoury 2025, PMID 41632137

13.8 Health economics of resmetirom

Analysis ICER vs standard of care QALY gain Price threshold Source
Pre-approval Markov (phase 2 inputs), US payer $53,929/QALY +1.24 cost-effective to $72.00/day at $100k/QALY Javanbakht 2023, PMID 36104546
Post-approval agent-based microsimulation, 200,000 F2/F3 patients, 2023 USD $140,134/QALY +0.26 $10,914 / $15,406 / $19,879 per year at $50k / $100k / $150k per QALY Le 2025, PMID 40577015
Same, assuming no discontinuation $318,740/QALY $5,645–$10,619/year PMID 40577015
Real-world access, 137 prescribed / 113 treated ≥3 months 24.1% required insurance appeal; 93.4% eventually approved; mean 12.5-day dispensing delay; 8.8% discontinued Shuaibi 2025, PMID 40688390

13.9 Thyroid dysfunction and MASLD

Exposure Outcome Effect Source
Primary hypothyroidism (24 cross-sectional studies, ~76.5M) prevalent MASLD OR 1.43 (1.23–1.66), I²=89% Mantovani 2024, PMID 38782564
same (5 studies) MASH or advanced fibrosis OR 2.84 (2.07–3.90), I²=0% PMID 38782564
same (4 longitudinal cohorts, median 4.5 y) incident MASLD HR 1.39 (0.98–1.97) — ns PMID 38782564
Subclinical hypothyroidism (10 studies, n=71,332) prevalent MASLD OR 1.46 (1.23–1.73) Amdetsion 2025, PMID 41357781
same (4 cohorts, n=31,518) incident MASLD HR 1.59 (1.05–2.40); prospective-only 1.90 (1.50–2.39) PMID 41357781
Hypothyroidism, biopsy-confirmed MASLD (12,172 vs 56,831) MASLD OR 1.68 (1.36–2.06); prevalence 2.5% vs 1.4% Yuan 2025, PMID 40342634
Hyperthyroidism, same MASLD OR 0.17 (0.05–0.56) PMID 40342634

13.10 Pregnancy

Population Outcome Effect Source
240 births to 162 women with biopsy-proven MASLD vs 1,140 matched (Sweden 1992–2017) preterm birth 16.7% vs 4.7%; aOR 3.41 (1.98–5.88); vs overweight/obese comparators aOR 4.60 (2.00–10.60) Marxer 2025, PMID 40630617
same medically indicated / spontaneous preterm aOR 11.90 (2.46–57.59) / 2.42 (1.16–5.04) PMID 40630617
same caesarean section aOR 1.63 (1.17–2.27); vs overweight/obese 1.20 (0.77–1.86) PMID 40630617
same Apgar, malformation, stillbirth, neonatal death no difference PMID 40630617
290,527 Korean women, pre-pregnancy health check, singleton delivery composite adverse pregnancy outcomes vs no SLD MASLD aOR 2.44 (2.33–2.55); MetALD 2.45 (2.26–2.66); ALD 2.28 (2.11–2.47) Jung 2026, PMID 41307877
same low birthweight MASLD 1.15 (1.05–1.27); ALD 1.21 (1.02–1.43); MetALD 0.96 (0.79–1.18) PMID 41307877

13.11 Burden, re-examined

Metric Value Source
MASLD DALYs, 2021 3.67 million (2.90–4.61) Zhang 2024, PMID 39151887
Type 2 diabetes DALYs, 2021 75 million (63–90) PMID 39151887
Hypertension DALYs, 2021 226 million (190–259) PMID 39151887
MASLD DALY annual percentage change, 1990–2021 +0.05% (−0.06 to 0.17) — not significant PMID 39151887
NAFLD prevalence, India, adults (62 datasets, n=23,581) 38.6% (32.0–45.5) Shalimar 2022, PMID 35677499
…average-risk / high-risk subgroups 28.1% (20.8–36.0) / 52.8% (46.5–59.1) PMID 35677499
…hospital-based vs community-based 40.8% (32.6–49.3) vs 28.2% (16.9–41.0) PMID 35677499
NAFLD prevalence, Indian children (8 datasets, n=2,903) 35.4% (18.2–54.7); obese 63.4% (59.4–67.3); non-obese 12.4% (4.4–23.5) PMID 35677499
NAFLD prevalence in type 1 diabetes (20 studies, n=3,901) 19.3% (12.3–27.5) overall; ultrasound 27.1%, biopsy 19.3%, MRI 8.6%, elastography 2.3% de Vries 2020, PMID 32827432

13.12 ClinicalTrials.gov, re-queried 2026-09-02

Query (v2 API) Count
query.cond=(MASLD OR NAFLD OR MASH OR NASH OR "steatotic liver disease") 2,056
…plus AREA[StudyType]INTERVENTIONAL AND AREA[Phase]PHASE3 112
…plus AREA[OverallStatus]RECRUITING AND AREA[StudyType]INTERVENTIONAL AND AREA[Phase]PHASE3 17

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. Prevalence estimates 29.8%–38% are not in conflict; they answer different questions. Modality (ultrasound vs CAP), study period (prevalence is genuinely rising at ~0.7%/yr) and case definition (NAFLD 18.5% vs MAFLD 19.3% vs MASLD 20.8% in the same NHANES III sample) each move the number. Quote with all three attached, and never average them.

  2. The leading cause of death depends on the population. In unselected NAFLD, cardiac deaths outnumber liver deaths ~4.5:1 (PMID 36626630). In the Swedish nationwide biopsy cohort, extrahepatic cancer (aHR 2.16) and cirrhosis (aHR 18.15) dominate excess mortality with CVD contributing modestly (aHR 1.35) (PMID 33037056). In the Asian CLIONE biopsy registry, liver-related death leads and fibrosis is not associated with overall mortality after adjustment (PMID 35051649). In the NASH CRN prospective cohort, cardiac events do not differ across fibrosis stages while liver events rise steeply (PMID 34670043). These are four different populations, not four contradictory facts about one population.

  3. Fibrosis-stage mortality ratios disagree by two- to three-fold at F4 — MRR 6.40 (Dulai), HR 3.66 (Ng), RR 3.42 (Taylor), HR 10.9 (Angulo, death or transplant). Adjustment, follow-up duration and reference-group composition explain most of it. Dulai pooled simple steatosis and NASH without fibrosis into the reference stratum, which attenuates the ratios.

  4. Liver-related mortality confidence intervals are enormous (e.g. MRR 42.30, 95% CI 3.51–510.34 at F4) because liver deaths are rare in the reference stratum. The direction is certain; the magnitude is not.

  5. Placebo response in MASH trials ranges from 2% to 34.3% for steatohepatitis resolution and 7% to 30% for fibrosis improvement. This spread exceeds most drug effects, so cross-trial comparison of the two approved drugs — resmetirom's 9.7% placebo arm against semaglutide's 34.3% — is not valid, and neither are network-meta-analytic rankings built on top of it.

  6. Non-invasive test accuracy varies by world region by up to 0.09 AUC for FIB-4 and 0.11 for Agile 4 within a single harmonised cohort (PMID 41100867). No explanation has been established, and no region-specific thresholds have been derived and validated.

  7. Incidence estimates are dominated by East Asia, but the abstract's counts are internally inconsistent. It reports 63 studies overall and lists 26 China/Hong Kong, 22 South Korea, 14 Japan and two elsewhere, which sum to 64 (PMID 37040843). Do not quote “62 of 63”; the geographic concentration is clear, but that fraction is not arithmetically supportable from the abstract.

  8. MASLD prevalence peaks at moderate socio-demographic index (PMID 40062742) and correlates inversely with human development index (coefficient −0.523, p=0.005) (PMID 39094335) — the opposite of the naive affluence model of metabolic disease.

  9. Every projection assumes no effective therapy. All five models in §11 were built before or without incorporating resmetirom and incretin uptake; the largest (PMID 39821400) states this explicitly.

  10. Two figures in §5 have published confidence intervals that do not contain their point estimates, both from the T2D global-epidemiology abstract (PMID 38521116). They are reproduced as published and flagged rather than silently corrected.

  11. "MASLD-related HCC" means two different things. 12.4% of HCC has MAFLD as its sole aetiology; 48.7% has MAFLD present as sole or contributory factor (PMID 38623613). The NAFLD-defined figure is 15.1% (PMID 35255263). These are not interchangeable.

  12. All ClinicalTrials.gov counts are a snapshot. The registry changes daily; §12 is valid only for 2026-09-02.

  13. New 2026 audit findings alter prior absence claims. MASLD recompensation occurred in 17.7% of an MASLD subgroup (PMID 42467948); MELD 3.0 up-categorised 65.4% and down-categorised 11.2% of MASH transplant candidates without significantly increasing transplant access (PMID 41284513); 33% of statin-indicated people with MASLD were untreated versus 19% without MASLD (PMID 41861677); and sequential FIB-4 excluded 43% of biopsy-confirmed fibrotic MASLD from second-line testing in a 186-person prospective study (PMID 42566274).

  14. Lean-MASLD cardiovascular risk is directionally contested, and the split maps onto study design. Population-based cohorts report lower CVD incidence in lean disease (aHR 0.73–0.89; PMIDs: 38570344, 41093635), pooled adjusted analysis reports no difference (HR 0.89, 0.77–1.02; PMID 39117942), and US health-system EHR cohorts report higher CVD, heart failure, cerebrovascular events and mortality (HR 1.21–1.48; PMIDs: 41614694, 40406910). Two independent syntheses simultaneously report fewer CVD events and more CVD deaths in lean disease (PMIDs: 41093635, 38599554), which implies higher case fatality and has no proposed mechanism. Liver-related mortality (2–3.5 fold higher) is not contested.

  15. Biopsy sampling error exceeds reader error, and neither is small. Paired cores from the same session differ by ≥1 fibrosis stage in 41% of patients and miss bridging fibrosis in 35% of those who have it (PMID 15940625); inter-reader κ for the two licensing endpoints is 0.366–0.396 in a real trial dataset, 46.3% of enrolled patients fail at least one other reader's entry criteria, and simulated power falls from >90% to 40% (PMID 32610115). Applying the sampling-error benchmark retrospectively, no natural-history or trial study has shown a change in activity grade or ballooning exceeding sampling variability (PMID 17767466). Negative MASH trials cannot currently be distinguished from unmeasurable endpoints.

  16. Two lifetime cost-effectiveness models of resmetirom differ ~5-fold on QALYs and land on opposite sides of $100,000/QALY — +1.24 QALYs and $53,929/QALY pre-approval (PMID 36104546) versus +0.26 QALYs and $140,134/QALY post-approval (PMID 40577015). Both extrapolate the same 52-week histological surrogate. In the later model, lower discontinuation worsens cost-effectiveness (ICER $318,740/QALY with none).

  17. Two contemporaneous network meta-analyses of overlapping MASH trials produce different podiums. Souza ranks pegozafermin, cilofexor+firsocostat and cilofexor+selonsertib highest for fibrosis (PMID 39903735); Han ranks pegbelfermin first and obeticholic acid first at 1.5 years, and pegbelfermin does not appear in Souza's ranking at all (PMID 41811770). SUCRA rankings are unstable to inclusion criteria, endpoint definition and time window.

  18. About 39% of people classified as MASLD by self-reported alcohol intake have a phosphatidylethanol concentration in the MetALD or ALD range (PMID 40945520). Because misclassification is essentially one-directional (under-reporting 39.5%/11.1%; over-reporting 0.7%/0.1%), every MASLD-versus-MetALD outcome contrast in this file is attenuated by an unmeasured amount, and the reported MetALD hepatic hazard ratios of 1.23–1.62 (PMIDs: 42120953, 40953570) are lower bounds.

  19. MASLD's measured global disability burden is small relative to its prevalence and has not changed in three decades — 3.67 million DALYs against 75 million for type 2 diabetes and 226 million for hypertension, APC +0.05% (ns) (PMID 39151887) — while GBD's own age-standardised MASLD prevalence rose 11.2% over 2010–2021 (PMID 40062742). This is an attribution artefact (burden reassigned to cirrhosis and to cardiovascular disease), not a measurement of unimportance, and it has not been re-attributed under alternative rules.

  20. Reported NAFLD prevalence in type 1 diabetes spans a twelve-fold range within one meta-analysis, by modality — 27.1% by ultrasound to 2.3% by transient elastography (PMID 32827432). No modern reference standard has been applied to an adequately sized type 1 cohort, so the size of this comorbidity is genuinely unknown.

  21. Glycaemic control slows fibrosis progression without changing liver events. In 7,543 MASLD patients with serial elastography, T2D raised stiffness progression (HR 1.501) and liver-related events (HR 2.030), and poor long-term control raised progression within T2D (HR 1.524) — but control made no difference to liver-related events (p=0.625) or to regression (p=0.957) (PMID 41076043). Whether that is insufficient follow-up or a genuine dissociation is unresolved.