Skip to content

Patient-voice layer — lung adenocarcinoma

Last curated: 2026-08-29

Purpose

This layer records recurring experiences that affect diagnosis, testing, treatment, safety, survivorship, and research priorities. It complements—not replaces—clinical evidence. The wiki synthesis is the concise entry point.

Method

Sources were selected from:

  1. PubMed-indexed qualitative, survey, patient-reported-outcome, caregiver, stigma, access, and supportive-care research retrieved live in this build session.
  2. Public pages of established lung-cancer or molecular-subtype organizations fetched on 2026-08-29.
  3. Published trial PRO analyses when they measure function or symptoms beyond clinician-graded adverse events.

Themes are included only when supported by at least two independent sources. Organization pages establish what resources and priorities an organization publicly presents; they are not prevalence studies.

Ethics rules

  • Public sources only.
  • Paraphrase; any direct quotation is ≤15 words and attributed.
  • Do not record names or identifying details of private individuals.
  • Do not infer diagnosis, smoking history, genotype, or preference from a story.
  • Report themes in aggregate and retain disagreement.
  • Distinguish organization advocacy from empirical patient-experience research.
  • Do not reproduce posts from closed groups.
  • Remove a source if its public status or consent basis becomes unclear.

Coverage

Domain Coverage Main limitation
Stigma and smoking blame Strong Many studies are US/English-language and cross-sectional
Diagnosis/referral Moderate Health-system pathways differ
Biomarker waiting/access Moderate Implementation studies often measure process, not lived experience
Chronic targeted therapy Limited-moderate Trial AE tables dominate; qualitative driver-specific work is sparse
Caregivers Moderate Partner caregivers overrepresented
Financial toxicity Moderate Insurance context is country-specific
Trial access Moderate Referral and site data often not adenocarcinoma-specific
Global South Limited English-language and web-access bias
Racial/ethnic minorities Limited-moderate Small subgroup samples and broad categories
Young adults and parents Limited Advocacy narratives exceed peer-reviewed evidence

Files

  • Organizations — verified public organizations, geography, focus, and access dates.
  • Themes — aggregate synthesis with at least two sources per theme.
  • Sources — annotated evidence ledger and coverage limits.

Update protocol

At each sweep:

  1. Re-fetch every organization URL and record redirects or closure.
  2. Search PubMed for new qualitative/PRO/caregiver/equity work.
  3. Add, sharpen, or retire themes only with source support.
  4. Check whether molecular-subtype organizations have changed names or scope.
  5. Record languages, regions, and groups still missing.

Safety boundary

Organization directories can help people locate education or peer support, but inclusion is not endorsement, accreditation, or a substitute for clinical care. Emergency symptoms belong in red flags and safety concerns.