Skip to content

Not yet independently audited

This page was written from verified sources but has not yet passed the independent citation audit. Treat its claims as provisional.

Annotated sources

Source Type Contribution Limitation
Espíndola & Blay 2009, PMID 19225241 Qualitative meta-synthesis, 24 studies Identity, control, positive/negative meanings Mostly female; studies 1990–2005; authors rated most B-grade
Harrop et al. 2023, PMID 36577133 Lived-experience perspective Classification consequences of “atypical” Perspective, not prevalence study
Verma et al. 2024, PMID 37897094 Lived-experience perspective Case for reconceptualizing atypical AN Perspective; authorship not population sampling
O’Connell 2023, PMID 34041954 Autoethnography Diagnostic identity and performance One public scholarly account; not generalizable
Asaria 2023, PMID 37400874 / 38082348 Lived-experience letters, single author Argues against the “terminal anorexia” label as harmful; second letter addresses each proposed criterion Two letters by one author; normative perspective, not a sample
Robb et al. 2026, PMID 42410953 Mixed-methods stakeholder study (up to 219 quantitative, 182 qualitative) Documents the actual distribution of lived-experience, caregiver and clinician views on the proposed criteria Self-selected respondents; not a probability sample
Gaudiani 2025, PMID 40361218 Letter by the original proposal's lead author Formal disavowal of the term “terminal anorexia nervosa” Single-author essay
Bauschka et al. 2025, PMID 40760030 Collaborative ethics article Dialogue across clinical/medical/lived experience Not an outcome study
Beat Public organization site UK patient/carer support and advocacy Service description; no independent effectiveness evaluation
ANAD Public organization site US peer-support services Same
F.E.A.S.T. Public organization site International caregiver resources Caregiver-centered; same
EDFA government directory Government directory Verifies Australian national carer role Brief description; not outcome evidence

Coverage-limits note

The source set is not a representative survey. It overrepresents English-language, digitally accessible and publishable narratives. No theme frequency is estimated. Private social-media posts, closed support groups and identifiable individual stories were intentionally excluded.