Skip to content

Uterine adenosarcoma — statistics sheet

Last curated: 2026-09-01

Purpose. Source-locked figures: incidence shares, age, stage, survival, recurrence, nodal rates, occult-sarcoma denominators. Every figure carries source, year, population, and method. Conflicting estimates are shown side by side, never averaged. Registry figures lack sarcomatous overgrowth and central pathology review; institutional figures are referral-biased. All cited PMIDs were independently re-fetched through PubMed E-utilities on 2026-09-01.

How to cite. Carry the PMID forward with the figure. Never cite “the statistics sheet” as the source.


1. How rare

Figure Population / method Source
~5% of uterine sarcomas Review synthesis Nathenson 2016, PMID 27718181; Friedlander 2014, PMID 25341585
5–8% of uterine sarcomas Review introducing a fertility-sparing case L'Heveder 2019, PMID 31584132
0.43% of uterine cancers; 0.16% of cervical; 0.04% of ovarian NCDB 1998–2011: 1,884 uterine / 229 cervical / 92 ovarian adenosarcomas Seagle 2016, PMID 27771166
544 adenosarcomas among 5,496 SEER “sarcoma” registrations that include carcinosarcoma (10%) SEER 1988–2006 Arend 2010, PMID 20688363
994 uterine adenosarcomas SEER 1973–2013 Machida 2017, PMID 28109626
797 in a survival model SEER Qu 2020, PMID 33680946
41 new uterine adenosarcomas vs 366 uterine sarcomas in 2017 (≈11% of that year’s registered uterine sarcoma) JSOG annual registry Nagase 2021, PMID 33631867
258 PubMed records for uterine adenosarcoma E-utilities esearch 2026-09-01 independent audit session
Age-adjusted uterine sarcoma incidence 7 vs 3.6 vs 2.7 per 100,000 (Black vs White vs other); difference driven by LMS and carcinosarcoma, not adenosarcoma SEER 1989–1999, n=2,677 uterine sarcomas Brooks 2004, PMID 15047237

No paper retrieved this session reports a population incidence of uterine adenosarcoma per 100,000 women with central pathology review.


2. Age and site

Figure Population Source
Median age 58 (range 14–89) 100-case expert series Clement 1990, PMID 2156771
Mean age 50 (range 13–83); 37 corpus, 11 cervix, 4 ovary 55-case series Gallardo 2009, PMID 18941402
Median 47.5 (19–75); 38.9% cervical 49-case single centre Yuan 2019, PMID 31139558
Median 51 (IQR 41–68); 74.2% corpus, 22.6% cervix 31-case single centre Li 2022, PMID 35005157
MRI-review median 48.5 (9–79) 30 imaging cases Morikawa 2025, PMID 39729099

Younger medians in recent surgical series are referral/cervical-mix effects, not a documented falling incidence age.


3. Stage and invasion

Figure Population Source
Myometrial invasion 15/100, deep in 4 Clement 100 Clement 1990, PMID 2156771
Myometrial invasion 14/30 uterine (47%): minimal 5, ⅓ thickness 7, >50% 2 Gallardo uterine subset Gallardo 2009, PMID 18941402
Of 30 uterine-corpus with known stage: 17 IA, 11 IB, 1 IC, 1 IIIC Gallardo Gallardo 2009, PMID 18941402
Majority early-stage vs carcinosarcoma SEER 544 adenosarcomas Arend 2010, PMID 20688363
Pathological T1 in 85.2% of MRI-reviewed cases Morikawa imaging set Morikawa 2025, PMID 39729099

FIGO 2009 adenosarcoma IA = no myometrial invasion; IB ≤½; IC >½ (Prat 2009, PMID 19135669). Do not apply LMS/ESS size-based stage I.


4. Sarcomatous overgrowth frequency

Figure Design Source
17/31 (55%) GOG hysterectomy + staging laparotomy Kaku 1992, PMID 1316323
18/55 (33%) Clinicopathologic series Gallardo 2009, PMID 18941402
5/19 (26%) up-front treated MSK treatment series Tanner 2013, PMID 23283300
15/49 (30.6%) Single-centre 12-year Yuan 2019, PMID 31139558
55.2% MRI systematic review (imaging-selected) Morikawa 2025, PMID 39729099
“about 10% of cases” Practical review Ulrich 2018, PMID 30326467

The spread reflects different series designs and case mixes; these estimates should be shown side by side rather than collapsed into a single prevalence estimate.


5. Survival

Figure Population Source
Stage I 5-year 79% (75–84%); stage III 48% (29–65%) SEER adenosarcoma 1988–2006 Arend 2010, PMID 20688363
HR of death vs carcinosarcoma 0.35 (0.28–0.45) SEER multivariable Arend 2010, PMID 20688363
Survival with uterine-wall invasion 63–69%; extra-uterine <50% SEER Arend 2010, PMID 20688363
Stage I 5-year OS without SO up to 80% Guideline synthesis Karabajakian 2023, PMID 37202293; Ulrich 2018, PMID 30326467
Stage I 5-year OS overall 60–80%; with SO 50–60% Review Nathenson 2016, PMID 27718181
Median OS all-comers 8.5 years; DFS 4.7 years MDACC n=165 Nathenson 2018, PMID 30044322
Median OS with SO 5.2 vs 14.5 years (p<0.0001) MDACC n=165 Nathenson 2018, PMID 30044322
Median OS with invasion 5.8 years vs not reached (p=0.0005) MDACC n=165 Nathenson 2018, PMID 30044322
Median OS with LVSI 1.0 vs 8.9 years (p=0.0021) MDACC n=165 Nathenson 2018, PMID 30044322
Median PFS 29.4 vs 105.9 months (HR 2.58, 1.37–4.84); OS 55.4 vs 112.4 months (HR 2.45, 1.26–4.76) by SO MDACC n=74 Carroll 2014, PMID 25449308
2-year PFS and OS 20% with SO vs 100% without MSK n=19 (5 SO) Tanner 2013, PMID 23283300
Disease-specific death 34% (29/86); stage IA recurrence 13% (4/30), death 3.3% (1/30) Japanese literature-assembled n=110 Tate 2018, PMID 29441675
Deep-learning test c-index 0.774 vs Cox 0.726 SEER n=797 Qu 2020, PMID 33680946

Tate is publication-biased. Qu is discrimination, not a survival rate. Arend stage I 79% is unstratified by SO.


6. Recurrence

Figure Population Source
23/100; mean 3.4 years (0.5–9.5); ≥5 years in ⅓ of recurrences; hematogenous in 2 Clement 100 Clement 1990, PMID 2156771
10/25 (40%); median interval 5 years Zaloudek adenosarcomas Zaloudek 1981, PMID 6263458
9/30 (30%); 6/30 (20%) dead at mean 38.3 months Kaku GOG Kaku 1992, PMID 1316323
Stage I: 77% (17/22) with SO vs 22% (8/37) without Carroll Carroll 2014, PMID 25449308
Review compilation: 23% without SO vs 77% with SO Nathenson review Nathenson 2016, PMID 27718181
SO subset: recurrence 45% (9/20), death 35% (7/20); distant 44% of 27 recurrences; lung in 75% of distant Tate assembled Tate 2018, PMID 29441675
Median OS from recurrence 1.8 years; surgery for first recurrence 26.3 vs 15.1 months MDACC n=78 recurrent Nathenson 2017, PMID 29445312
Recurrence 36.4% in MRI-reviewed set Morikawa Morikawa 2025, PMID 39729099

7. Nodes, margins, size

Figure Population Source
Nodal metastasis 2.9% adenosarcoma vs 3.4% LMS vs 6.6% ESS SEER Machida 2017, PMID 28109626
Nodal aHR for CSS 2.34 (adenosarcoma) SEER multivariable Machida 2017, PMID 28109626
Literature-review n=230: nodal aHR for PFS 4.72 vs SO 2.88, heterologous 2.08, deep invasion 1.51 Machida systematic review of published cases Machida 2017, PMID 28109626
Nodal 36/1,176 (3.1%); distant 33/1,342 (2.5%) NCDB Seagle 2016, PMID 27771166
0/15 lymphadenectomies positive Li n=31 Li 2022, PMID 35005157
Size HR 1.06 per cm (1.01–1.12) NCDB uterine subset Seagle 2016, PMID 27771166
Mean size 6.5 cm (1–20) Gallardo Gallardo 2009, PMID 18941402
Mean longest MRI diameter 9.3 cm Morikawa Morikawa 2025, PMID 39729099

8. Systemic therapy (retrospective)

Figure Population Source
RECIST CR+PR 31.2% doxorubicin-based; 14.3% gemcitabine/docetaxel Recurrent/metastatic n=78, first-line chemo subset Nathenson 2017, PMID 29445312
Median PFS 15.4 months doxorubicin/ifosfamide vs 5.0 gemcitabine/docetaxel vs 6.5 other doxorubicin vs 5.7 platinum Same Nathenson 2017, PMID 29445312
Adjuvant in stage I SO: PFS 46.7 vs 29.4 months (p=0.28); OS 97.3 vs 55.4 (p=0.18) Carroll Carroll 2014, PMID 25449308
ER-positive 34/54 (63%) mixed uterine sarcomas; OS 36 vs 16 months Ioffe mixed histologies Ioffe 2009, PMID 19767065

Not randomised. OS from first-line chemo did not differ by regimen in Nathenson 2017.


9. Occult sarcoma / morcellation (uterine sarcoma as a class)

Figure Population Source
Occult uterine sarcoma 1/278 or 3.60/1,000 (2.97–4.23); occult LMS 1/429 or 2.33/1,000 (1.83–2.84) 34,728 leiomyoma hysterectomies, Kaiser 2006–2013 Raine-Bennett 2016, PMID 26646120
Combined morcellation vs none, death at 1 year in stage I LMS: RR 5.12 (1.33–19.76) Same, n=111 stage I LMS Raine-Bennett 2016, PMID 26646120
Unexpected sarcoma 0.13% (5/3,759; 0.04–0.31%) of benign-indication hysterectomies; 0.39% (1 in 256) among fibroids; all 4 unexpected fibroid sarcomas were LMS Olmsted, 4,232 hysterectomies Multinu 2019, PMID 30447212
Incidence 0.03% uterine weight <250 g vs 15.4% (2/13) ≥2000 g Same Multinu 2019, PMID 30447212

No adenosarcoma-specific morcellation survival estimate was retrieved. One adenosarcoma+morcellation PubMed hit: Krentel 2016, PMID 27769260 (case report).


10. Molecular frequencies (sequenced series, n small)

Figure n Source
MDM2/CDK4 amp 5/18 (28%); MYBL1 amp 4/18 (22%); PI3K pathway 13/18 (72%); ATRX 3/18 (17%); TP53 2/18, both SO; rearrangements 0/18 18 subjects Howitt 2015, PMID 25231023
Mean gene-level CNVs 24.6 with SO vs 5 without (p=0.0002); mutation count 9.7 vs 9.6 Same Howitt 2015, PMID 25231023
TP53 pathway 7/9 (78%) high-grade 9 high-grade Hodgson 2017, PMID 28834809
DICER1 18/19 (95%) uterine ERMS vs 7/27 (26%) adenosarcoma Central-review series de Kock 2020, PMID 31900434
BAP1 IHC loss 6/24 (25%); BAP1 homdel unique to adenosarcoma among 196 gyn mesenchymal tumours 27 sequenced, IHC subset Momeni Boroujeni 2022, PMID 36138078
ESR1 fusions: ESR1::NCOA3 10, ESR1::NCOA2 1, ESR1::MAMLD1 1 12 adenosarcoma-like uterine neoplasms; classification relative to conventional adenosarcoma/UTROSCT unresolved Agaimy 2026, PMID 41555057

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. SO frequency 10% vs 55% is series construction, not biology.
  2. Arend stage I 79% vs Carroll stage I SO 77% recurrence are not the same population; registries cannot see SO.
  3. Seagle: radiation associated with worse OS vs Nathenson: no OS difference for radiation vs Brooks mixed-sarcoma: radiation plus surgery better in stage II–IV — confounding by indication plus mixed histologies. Do not average.
  4. Seagle: node status not independent for OS vs Machida: nodal aHR 2.34 for CSS — different registries, endpoints, covariates.
  5. Tate 34% disease-specific death is a literature-assembled series.
  6. Morcellation numbers are LMS/uterine-sarcoma-class, not adenosarcoma.
  7. Ioffe ER 63% is mixed uterine sarcoma.