Skip to content

Not yet independently audited

This page was written from verified sources but has not yet passed the independent citation audit. Treat its claims as provisional.

Depression statistics

Last updated: 2026-10-29. Figures are not averaged across incompatible methods. The WHO fact sheet was re-opened on this date, and its modeled figures were unchanged from 2026-10-22.

Prevalence and burden

Figure Value Year/population Method Source
Lifetime DSM-5 MDD prevalence 20.6% US adults, NESARC-III structured diagnostic interview Hasin 2018, PMID 29450462
12-month DSM-5 MDD prevalence 10.4% US adults, NESARC-III structured diagnostic interview Hasin 2018, PMID 29450462
Mental-disorder DALYs 125.3 million 204 countries/territories, 2019 GBD modeling PMID 35026139
Share of all DALYs 4.9% global, 2019 GBD modeling PMID 35026139
Age-standardized DALY rate 1,581→1,566/100,000 global, 1990→2019 harmonized GBD series PMID 35026139
US MDD economic burden $326.2 billion US adults, 2018, 2020 dollars claims/workplace/suicide model Greenberg 2021, PMID 33950419
Inflation-adjusted burden change +37.9% US, 2010–2018 modeled comparison PMID 33950419
US healthcare spending associated with MDD $204.58 billion; 5.58% of $3.67 trillion personal healthcare spending US adults, pooled MEPS 2021–2023 applied to 2023 National Health Expenditure Accounts; dental and age ≤18 excluded two-part covariate-adjusted model, counterfactual of no MDD; MDD identified by ICD-10-CM F32 (depressive episode); healthcare spending only, no workplace or suicide costs, so not comparable with Greenberg's total burden Ghimire 2026, PMID 42913960
MDD-associated share by payer Medicaid 10.00%; Medicare 4.90%; other federal 11.77% same same model Ghimire 2026, PMID 42913960

WHO portal update — published 2026-09-11

Figure Value Year/population Method and scope Source
People experiencing depression approximately 322 million; 4% world population, 2023 WHO fact sheet citing GBD 2023 modeled estimates; depression, not a lifetime DSM-5 MDD interview measure WHO — “Depressive disorder (depression)”, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression, accessed 2026-10-29
Adults experiencing depression 5.2% overall; 4.1% men; 6.2% women global adults, 2023 same modeled source; retain separately from country surveys and prior GBD releases same WHO fact sheet, accessed 2026-10-29
Older adults experiencing depression 5.4% global adults aged 70 years and older, 2023 same modeled source and age definition same WHO fact sheet, accessed 2026-10-29

The newly checked MHA state/county dashboard contains voluntary online screening data through June 2026. It is a source of screening signals, not a population MDD prevalence denominator; no national prevalence estimate was imported from it. (Mental Health America — “MHA Data Methodology”, https://mhanational.org/data-in-your-community/mha-data-methodology/, accessed 2026-10-15.)

Treatment effects

Figure Value Population/method Source
Antidepressant acute response OR range 1.37–2.13 vs placebo 522 trials; 116,477 adults Cipriani 2018, PMID 29477251
Published effect-size inflation 32% FDA registration trials vs publications Turner 2008, PMID 18199864
Continuation relapse 18% drug vs 41% placebo responders randomized continue/stop Geddes 2003, PMID 12606176
Combination response advantage RR 1.27 vs medication; 1.25 vs psychotherapy 101-trial network meta-analysis Cuijpers 2020, PMID 31922679
Esketamine day-28 MADRS difference −4.0 points TRD phase 3 Popova 2019, PMID 31109201
ECT vs sham standardized effect −0.91 older meta-analysis UK ECT Review Group 2003, PMID 12642045
ECT vs pharmacotherapy standardized effect −0.80 older meta-analysis PMID 12642045

STAR*D — keep competing interpretations separate

Estimate Value Rule Source
Step-1 QIDS-SR remission 36.8% original report Rush 2006, PMID 17074942
Step-2 remission 30.6% original report PMID 17074942
Step-3 remission 13.7% original report PMID 17074942
Step-4 remission 13.0% original report PMID 17074942
Theoretical cumulative remission 67% original cumulative calculation PMID 17074942
Protocol-faithful estimates materially lower prespecified criteria/denominators Pigott 2023, PMID 37491091

Diagnostic heterogeneity

Figure Value Population/method Source
Unique symptom profiles 1,030 among 3,703 STAR*D symptom profiles Fried 2015, PMID 25451401
Profiles occurring once 48.6% same PMID 25451401
Anxious-distress specifier 74.6% US DSM-5 MDD Hasin 2018, PMID 29450462
Mixed-features specifier 15.5% US DSM-5 MDD PMID 29450462

Diagnostic accuracy and longitudinal conversion

Figure Value Population/method Source
PHQ-9 ≥10 sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.89) 100-study updated IPD meta-analysis; semistructured interview reference Negeri 2021, PMID 34610915
PHQ-9 ≥10 specificity 0.85 (95% CI 0.82–0.87) same PMID 34610915
PHQ-2 ≥2 sensitivity 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.94) IPD meta-analysis; semistructured interview reference Levis 2020, PMID 32515813
PHQ-2 ≥2 specificity 0.67 (95% CI 0.64–0.71) same PMID 32515813
Two-stage PHQ-2→PHQ-9 full-form reduction 57% (95% CI 56–58%) modeled administration reduction PMID 32515813
Bipolar conversion, 13 years 5.84% (95% CI 5.72–5.96) Swedish registers after major-depression registration Rhee 2023, PMID 37427550
Bipolar/psychotic-spectrum conversion, 15 years 11.1% (95% CI 10.7–11.6) 43,495 first hospitalizations for unipolar depression Baryshnikov 2020, PMID 32385906
Psychotic depression → bipolar conversion SHR 2.0 (95% CI 1.5–2.7) same cohort, vs mild depression PMID 32385906

Population heterogeneity and coverage

Figure Value Population/method Source
MDD prevalence in older adults 13.3% (95% CI 8.4–20.3) 20-study global meta-analysis, n=18,953 Abdoli 2022, PMID 34742925
MDD prevalence in LGBTQ+ samples 32.2% (95% CI 30.8–33.6); I² 99.6% 48-study meta-analysis, n=4,616,903 Cai 2024, PMID 38795782
Adolescent diagnosed MDD point prevalence 8% (95% CI 2–13) 72-study global synthesis Shorey 2022, PMID 34569066
Adolescent elevated-symptom point prevalence 34% (95% CI 30–38) screening/symptom threshold, not diagnosed MDD PMID 34569066
Any health-service coverage, high-income 51% (95% UI 20–82) Bayesian meta-regression, 149 studies Moitra 2022, PMID 35167593
Any health-service coverage, low/lower-middle income 20% (95% UI 1–53) same PMID 35167593
Minimally adequate treatment, high-income 23% (95% UI 2–55) same PMID 35167593
Minimally adequate treatment, low/lower-middle income 3% (95% UI <1–25) same PMID 35167593

Mechanisms and genetics — group estimates only

Figure Value Population/method Source
First-degree-relative aggregation OR 2.84 (95% CI 2.31–3.49) family-study meta-analysis Sullivan 2000, PMID 11007705
Twin heritability of liability 37% (95% CI 31–42) five twin studies PMID 11007705
Multi-ancestry GWAS scale 688,808 cases; 4,364,225 controls; 635 loci 29-country GWAS meta-analysis PGC 2025, PMID 39814019
Maximum liability variance explained by depression PGS 5.8% in Europeans same study PMID 39814019
Drug-naïve MDD TNF-α difference SMD 1.04 (95% CI 0.69–1.39) 23-study cytokine meta-analysis Islam 2023, PMID 37625799
Drug-naïve MDD CRP difference SMD 0.18 (95% CI −0.85–1.23) same; nonsignificant PMID 37625799
Reward-processing imaging database 41 studies; 794 MDD, 803 controls coordinate-based meta-analysis Liu 2019, PMID 31712555

Additional treatment and harm anchors

Figure Value Population/method Source
Primary-care CBT symptom effect Hedges g 0.22 (95% CI 0.15–0.30) 34 RCTs; 5,358 participants Santoft 2019, PMID 30688184
Primary-care CBT remission OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.15–2.14) same PMID 30688184
Task-shared psychotherapy symptom effect Hedges g −0.32 (95% CI −0.38 to −0.26; lower PHQ-9 favored intervention) 11-trial LMIC IPD meta-analysis, n=4,145 Karyotaki 2022, PMID 35319740
Task-shared psychotherapy remission OR 1.87 (95% CI 1.20–1.99) same PMID 35319740
VAST-D remission 22.3% switch-bupropion; 26.9% augment-bupropion; 28.9% augment-aripiprazole 1,522 predominantly male veterans, 12 weeks Mohamed 2017, PMID 28697253
Aripiprazole augmentation vs switch RR 1.30 (95% CI 1.05–1.60) for remission VAST-D PMID 28697253
OPTIMUM wellbeing difference +2.79 points (95% CI 0.56–5.02) aripiprazole augmentation vs bupropion switch, ≥60 years Lenze 2023, PMID 36867173
IV ketamine symptom effect Hedges g 1.52 (95% CI 0.98–2.22) dose-escalation RCT meta-analysis; low-quality evidence Seshadri 2024, PMID 38537759
Intranasal esketamine symptom effect Hedges g 0.31 (95% CI 0.18–0.44) same PMID 38537759
Antidepressant discontinuation symptom load, week 1 SMD 0.31 (95% CI 0.23–0.39), about one additional DESS symptom 11 RCTs, n=3,915 Kalfas 2025, PMID 40632531
Discontinuation-associated dizziness OR 5.52 (95% CI 3.81–8.01); risk difference 6.24% RCT meta-analysis vs placebo discontinuation PMID 40632531
Escitalopram vs sertraline 6-month weight change +0.41 kg (95% CI 0.31–0.52) target-trial emulation, 183,118 initiators Petimar 2024, PMID 38950403
Bupropion vs sertraline 6-month weight change −0.22 kg (95% CI −0.33 to −0.12) same PMID 38950403
Depression all-cause mortality RR 2.10 (95% CI 1.87–2.35) 268-study cohort meta-analysis Chan 2025, PMID 40948054
Depression-associated suicide mortality RR 9.89 (95% CI 7.59–12.88) same PMID 40948054
Natural-cause mortality RR 1.63 (95% CI 1.51–1.75) same PMID 40948054

Known conflicts and caveats

  • Survey prevalence varies by interview, recall period, threshold, and bipolar exclusions; screening prevalence is not MDD prevalence.
  • US cost figures differ in scope: Greenberg 2021 ($326.2 billion, PMID 33950419) models total economic burden, including workplace and suicide costs. Ghimire 2026 ($204.58 billion, PMID 42913960) estimates incremental healthcare spending only, and its F32 case definition counts any depressive episode rather than recurrent MDD. Do not subtract one from the other.
  • GBD estimates are modeled and revisions can change historical series; compare within one release.
  • STAR*D's 67% cumulative figure and protocol-faithful reanalysis answer different denominator/estimand choices; do not average them.
  • Odds ratios are not risk differences; absolute antidepressant benefit depends on placebo response.
  • Randomized-withdrawal relapse trials are enriched for prior response and tolerability and may confound withdrawal with relapse.