Skip to content

Not yet independently audited

This page was written from verified sources but has not yet passed the independent citation audit. Treat its claims as provisional.

PTSD statistics

Last curated: 2026-10-23 (new rows below; earlier sweep rows retain †)

Rule. These are source-specific estimates, not interchangeable constants. Diagnostic system, denominator, population, trauma and time horizon travel with every number. No pooled anxiety-disorder effect is represented as PTSD.

Estimates added 2026-10-16

Figure Estimate Population/year Method and limits Source
Probable PTSD by self-report instrument in the same sample PCL-5 ≥31: 26.9%; DSM-5 symptom algorithm: 27.1%; ITQ ICD-11 algorithm: 21.9% 483 Syrian refugees in Türkiye; October 2026 issue, first online July Same-sample psychometric study; not clinician-confirmed prevalence or evidence that either system is more accurate Alpay 2026, PMID 42438360, full-text Table 1
MDMA-assisted therapy, primary-endpoint PTSD symptoms Hedges’ g −0.71 (95% CI −0.95 to −0.47); 6 RCTs; n=242 at endpoint Published trials; search through 2025-11-25; 2026 living-review release Figure 1; 286 randomized in selected arms (Table 1), not the primary-analysis denominator; pooled MP4-containing secondary reports excluded (supplementary Table 10); all MAPS-model trials; low GRADE certainty Sevchik 2026, PMID 42860436
NHS mother-and-baby healthcare use costs, 6–12 months after birth £473 without PTSD/anxiety/depression symptoms; £840 with probable PTSD due to any cause; £861 with probable childbirth-related PTSD England/Scotland MAP ALLIANCE follow-up; 794 questionnaire respondents; 6-month groups: 55 probable PTSD, including 15 attributed to childbirth, versus 210 symptom-free comparators Observational, questionnaire-based service use; costs for mother and baby combined; small childbirth-related subgroup; group costs are associations, not intervention savings City St George’s / MAP ALLIANCE — "Counting the Cost of Birth Trauma: The Economic Impact of Postnatal PTSD in the UK", September 2026, https://www.mapstudy.org/_files/ugd/70a10c_9ba1976c09f14adfb93181562512bf0f.pdf, pp. 5–6, figure visually checked; accessed 2026-10-16

The birth-trauma briefing is a research/policy report, not a peer-reviewed trial or a national PTSD registry. Its separate June 2026 Birth Trauma Association survey supplied personal-experience material; it is not the denominator for the healthcare-cost comparison. The report's national savings projection is not retained here because no evaluated prevention effect establishes that those savings are achievable.

The VA National Center for PTSD epidemiology portal and PTSD Repository were also checked. The epidemiology portal displayed an August 2026 update and the Repository data release predates the requested window; neither is counted as a newly released registry statistic in this sweep (VA National Center for PTSD — "Epidemiology and Impact of PTSD", https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/essentials/epidemiology.asp; "PTSD Repository", https://www.ptsd.va.gov/ptsdrepository/index.asp; Data.gov — "Data File (2026_1): Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Treatments for PTSD", https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-file-2026_1-pharmacologic-and-nonpharmacologic-treatments-for-ptsd; accessed/search-result verified 2026-10-16).

Estimates added 2026-10-23

Figure Estimate Population/year Method and limits Source
CPTSD in forcibly displaced adults, descriptive pool 20.9% (95% CI 12.6–32.6%); 95% prediction interval 1.7–80.3%; I² = 98.3% 17 samples; n = 12,504; refugees, asylum seekers and internally displaced people; search through January 2026 Full text checked. Authors retain the pool as a descriptive summary. Community samples averaged 10.6%; treatment-seeking samples 55.2%. Study range 3.0–74.6%. This does not replace the 1–8% general-population range Melkam 2026, PMID 42900526
ITQ with and without clinical checks Standard ITQ: 19.2% PTSD or CPTSD (7.2% and 12.0%). With checks: 9.8% (3.9% and 5.9%). Relative reduction for either disorder 49.0% Quota sample of 5,070 adults in Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia; recruited 7–28 July 2025; published 21 October 2026 Full text, results section. Denominator is all participants, of whom 82.2% were trauma-exposed. Quota sample, not a national probability prevalence. Measurement finding, not a treatment-response result Hyland 2026, PMID 42905693
Military Health System evidence-based psychotherapy receipt 51.3% initiated at least one session; 25.7% received three sessions in 90 days; 7.5% received eight sessions in 14 weeks N = 3,459 patients with PTSD at eight US military treatment facilities, July 2018–December 2021 PubMed abstract. Full text was not retrieved. Evidence-based psychotherapy means prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy or EMDR. Both session thresholds are the paper's "minimally adequate dosage" McLean 2026, PMID 42906525
Trauma-focused CBT and comorbid depression Versus passive controls, Hedges' g = 0.97 (95% CI 0.80–1.14, k = 46). Versus active controls, g = 0.50 (95% CI 0.35–0.65, k = 29). Depression response odds ratio 3.07 (95% CI 1.18–7.94, k = 4) versus passive controls 136 RCTs; N = 8,868 assessed for depression; PROSPERO CRD42023479224 PubMed abstract only. Full text was not retrieved. First online 20 August 2025; October 2026 issue. Abstract says trauma-focused CBT had the highest certainty of results; no GRADE letter was read from a table Hoppen 2026, PMID 40830864
Benzodiazepine prescribing in Canadian OSI clinics 22% of patients; OR 1.12 per additional year of PTSD (95% CI 1.06–1.18); monotherapy under 1% 438 military personnel and veterans with primary PTSD; 13 psychiatrists; cross-sectional clinician report Full text checked. Referral-enriched tertiary clinics. Prescribing prevalence, not a harm estimate Collins 2026, PMID 42898444
VA Delphi on simultaneous chronic-pain and PTSD care 48 of 71 items reached the pre-set consensus 23 experts from 13 VA facilities interviewed; 15 completed four rounds PubMed abstract. Full text was not retrieved. Expert consensus, not an outcome trial and not a society guideline. Online 19 March 2026; October 2026 issue Zaccari 2026, PMID 41851426

The VA epidemiology page was retrieved again on 2026-10-23 (HTTP 200). The extracted text was site navigation, so no new national burden figure was taken from it.

Diagnosis and measurement

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
PCL-5 internal consistency α=.94 Trauma-exposed students; 2015 Development study, n=278 Blevins 2015, PMID 26606250
PCL-5 test–retest r=.82 Trauma-exposed students Psychometric study PMID 26606250
PCL-5 veteran internal consistency α=.96 VA samples, n=468 Validation Bovin 2016, PMID 26653052
PCL-5 veteran test–retest r=.84 VA samples Validation PMID 26653052
CAPS-5 inter-rater reliability κ=.78–1.00 Veterans, n=165 and 207 Structured-interview validation Weathers 2018, PMID 28493729
ITQ development samples n=1,051 / 247 UK community / clinical IRT and CFA Cloitre 2018, PMID 30178492

Epidemiology and conditional risk

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
PTSD after trauma in youth 15.9% (95% CI 11.5–21.5) 43 samples; n=3,563 Diagnostic-interview meta-analysis Alisic 2014, PMID 24785767
CPTSD population prevalence 1–8% Mixed populations through 2021 Review range Maercker 2022, PMID 35780794
CPTSD prevalence in mental-health facilities up to 50% Referral-enriched settings Review range PMID 35780794
US lifetime PTSD prevalence 6.1–8.3% United States; 2026 review Review of population survey estimates Flesaker 2026, PMID 42089634
Global PTSD prevalence 3.9% Global; 2026 review Review of population survey estimates PMID 42089634
Prenatal PTSD, community samples 3.3% (95% CI 2.44–4.54) 59 studies; N=24,267 Diagnostic-measure meta-analysis Yildiz 2017, PMID 27865585
Postpartum PTSD, community samples 4.0% (95% CI 2.77–5.71) Same review Meta-analysis PMID 27865585
Perinatal PTSD, high-risk groups 18.95% pregnancy; 18.5% postpartum Same review; referral-enriched Meta-analysis PMID 27865585
Negative subjective birth experience → birth PTSD r=0.59 50 studies; n=21,429 Correlational meta-analysis Ayers 2016, PMID 26878223
† Probable PTSD among trauma-exposed adults, by trauma burden 5.1% (95% CI 4.3–5.9) mild → 23.9% (95% CI 19.3–29.1) severe 8 countries (Brazil, France, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Philippines, Turkey, USA); 2023–2024; n=5,525 Population survey; PC-PTSD-5 screen, not diagnosis Abdalla 2026, PMID 42731553
† Probable PTSD by recent socioeconomic stressor burden 0.6% (95% CI 0.3–1.0) none → 17.9% (95% CI 15.6–20.4) severe Same survey Same; each added stressor OR 1.41 among mild-trauma respondents, attenuated at higher trauma burden PMID 42731553
† Lifetime alcohol use disorder among adults with PTSD 35.58% (95% CI 24.48–48.48%); I²=99.37% 20 observational studies; n=185,432 Multilevel meta-analysis; higher in clinical, inpatient and veteran samples Pozzolo Pedro 2026, PMID 42745626
† PTSD and first-ever stroke HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.31–1.72) 23 cohorts, 11,181,338 participants (all anxiety-related disorders pooled; PTSD stratum shown) Meta-analysis of HRs; persisted after adjustment for CV risk factors and depression Imtiaz 2026, PMID 42767516

Adult psychotherapy

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Adult NMA evidence base 90 trials; n=6,560; 22 interventions Adults with PTSD Network meta-analysis Mavranezouli 2020, PMID 32063234
EMDR vs waitlist SMD −2.07 (95% CrI −2.70 to −1.44) Adult PTSD Network estimate PMID 32063234
TF-CBT vs waitlist SMD −1.46 (−1.87 to −1.05) Adult PTSD Network estimate PMID 32063234
Supported self-help vs waitlist SMD −1.46 (−2.33 to −.59) Adult PTSD Network estimate PMID 32063234
Manualized-treatment evidence base 114 RCTs; n=8,171 Adult PTSD Systematic review Lewis 2020, PMID 32284821
Broad psychological review 64 trials Generally severe adult PTSD Systematic review Cusack 2016, PMID 26574151
Loss-of-diagnosis NNT <4 Exposure, CPT, CT, mixed CBT, EMDR vs controls Review estimate PMID 26574151
Exposure evidence base 65 articles; n=4,929 Adult PTSD Meta-analysis McLean 2022, PMID 34954460
Exposure vs waitlist/TAU large Adult PTSD Meta-analysis; exact effect varies PMID 34954460
Exposure vs non-TF active small Adult PTSD Meta-analysis PMID 34954460
Exposure vs TF therapy/medication negligible Adult PTSD Meta-analysis PMID 34954460
Adult NMA + pairwise evidence base 157 RCTs; n=11,565 Adult PTSD Network and pairwise meta-analysis Hoppen 2023, PMID 37141033
TF-CBT vs non-TF, short term g=0.17 (95% CI 0.03–0.31) 190 comparisons Network estimate PMID 37141033
TF-CBT vs non-TF, long term (>5 mo) g=0.20 (95% CI 0.04–0.35) 41 comparisons Network estimate PMID 37141033
EMDR vs control g=0.93 (95% CI 0.67–1.18); I²=72% 76 trials; 4/27 at low risk of bias Meta-analysis Cuijpers 2020, PMID 32043428
EMDR vs other therapies g=0.36 (95% CI 0.14–0.57); null in low-risk-of-bias subset Same review Meta-analysis PMID 32043428
EMDR vs other therapies (IPD) no significant difference (β=−0.24) Individual participant data IPD meta-analysis Wright 2024, PMID 38173121
Eye-movement additive effect, clinical d=0.41 15 EMDR trials Dismantling meta-analysis Lee 2013, PMID 23266601
Eye-movement additive effect, laboratory d=0.74 11 non-therapy trials; n=849 total Dismantling meta-analysis PMID 23266601
Massed vs spaced PE noninferior (1-sided 95% CI upper bound 2.29) 370 active-duty personnel Noninferiority RCT Foa 2018, PMID 29362795
Massed vs standard PE difference 0.94 (95% CI −4.19 to 6.07) 138 military/veterans Noninferiority RCT Dell 2023, PMID 35440345
Telehealth vs in-person CPT noninferior; pooled −20.5 (95% CI −29.6 to −11.4) 126 women Noninferiority RCT Morland 2015, PMID 26243685
WET vs CPT noninferior (max difference 3.96 points) 169 active-duty service members Noninferiority RCT Sloan 2022, PMID 35015065

Dropout

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
CBT dropout 29.0% PTSD stratum only Placebo-controlled cross-disorder meta-analysis Carpenter 2018, PMID 29451967
Placebo dropout 17.2% PTSD stratum only Same PTSD stratum PMID 29451967
Routine-care dropout range cited 38–51% PTSD EBP routine care Background to randomized analysis Harper 2026, PMID 41926191
CPT–PE dropout trial n=916 US veterans; 79.9% male Randomized trial analysis PMID 41926191
PE dropout 52.31% Same trial Randomized comparison PMID 41926191
CPT dropout 45.77% Same trial Randomized comparison PMID 41926191
TF-CBT dropout, IPD 27% overall 25 pooled trials; n=823 IPD meta-analysis Wright 2024, PMID 39537555
TF-CBT dropout, civilians vs military 23% vs 42% (RR 2.37) Same IPD pool IPD meta-analysis PMID 39537555
TF-CBT vs non-TF acceptability RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.08–1.70) 22 comparisons Pairwise meta-analysis Hoppen 2023, PMID 37141033
PE ≥2 sessions/week vs less often 21.0% vs 34.0% dropout (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30–0.89) 35 RCTs; n=1,508 Meta-analysis Levinson 2022, PMID 35278229
WET vs CPT session completion 76.5% vs 54.8% 169 active-duty service members Noninferiority RCT Sloan 2022, PMID 35015065

Sleep and prazosin — conflicting estimates retained

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Early prazosin crossover n=10; mean 9.5 mg bedtime Vietnam veterans Double-blind crossover Raskind 2003, PMID 12562588
Parallel prazosin trial n=40 Veterans Randomized placebo-controlled Raskind 2007, PMID 17069768
PACT re-test n=304; 13 centres Veterans with chronic PTSD/nightmares 26-week RCT Raskind 2018, PMID 29414272
Nightmare-item difference, week 10 0.2 (95% CI −.3 to .8), p=.38 PACT Between groups PMID 29414272
PSQI difference, week 10 0.1 (−.9 to 1.1), p=.80 PACT Between groups PMID 29414272
CGIC difference, week 10 0 (−.3 to .3), p=.96 PACT Between groups PMID 29414272
Supine systolic BP difference −6.7 mm Hg PACT, week 10 Change vs placebo PMID 29414272
New/worsening suicidal ideation 8% vs 15% Prazosin vs placebo Adverse-event report PMID 29414272
Active-duty prazosin trial n=67; positive on all three primary outcomes Soldiers returned from Iraq/Afghanistan 15-week RCT Raskind 2013, PMID 23846759
Prazosin, pooled vs control g=0.61 nightmares; 0.81 PTSD symptoms; 0.85 sleep quality 7 prazosin trials within N=1,078 Meta-analysis Yücel 2020, PMID 31855732
IRT, pooled vs control g=0.51 nightmares; 0.31 PTSD symptoms; 0.51 sleep quality 8 IRT trials within N=1,078 Meta-analysis PMID 31855732
Prazosin vs IRT no significant difference on any outcome (all p>0.10) Same meta-analysis Indirect comparison PMID 31855732
Nightmare network meta-analysis prazosin and IRT the only effective interventions 29 RCTs; 14 interventions; n=2,214 Network meta-analysis Zhang 2022, PMID 35661755
IRT anchoring RCT nights with nightmares d=1.24; nightmares/week d=0.85 168 women; 114 completed follow-up Waitlist RCT Krakow 2001, PMID 11476655
Baseline standing systolic BP +14-point CAPS reduction per 10 mm Hg under prazosin (p=.002) 32 prazosin, 35 placebo Secondary analysis Raskind 2016, PMID 27320368
CBT-I before CPT greater 6- and 20-week reductions in ISI, HAM-D and CAPS n=110 interpersonal-violence survivors Sequential RCT Pigeon 2022, PMID 34265777
CBT-I integrated with PE no PTSD difference vs sleep hygiene + PE (P=.844) n=94 veterans RCT Colvonen 2025, PMID 40488726

MDMA-assisted therapy

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
MAPP1 n=90 Severe PTSD Phase 3 RCT Mitchell 2021, PMID 33972795
MAPP1 CAPS-5 effect d=.91; p<.0001 Severe PTSD MDMA-AT vs therapy+placebo PMID 33972795
MAPP1 CAPS-5 change −24.4 vs −13.9 Completers Mean change PMID 33972795
MAPP1 disability effect d=.43; p=.0116 Severe PTSD SDS PMID 33972795
MAPP2 n=104 (53 vs 51) Moderate–severe PTSD Confirmatory phase 3 Mitchell 2023, PMID 37709999
MAPP2 CAPS-5 change −23.7 vs −14.8 MDMA-AT vs therapy+placebo LS mean PMID 37709999
MAPP2 CAPS-5 effect d=.70; p<.001 Moderate–severe PTSD Between-group PMID 37709999
MAPP2 disability effect d=.40; p=.03 Moderate–severe PTSD SDS PMID 37709999
MAPP2 severe TEAEs 5/53 vs 2/51 MDMA-AT vs control Arm-level count PMID 37709999
Regulatory outcome FDA declined approval, August 2024; additional phase 3 required USA, 2024 decision Reviews, 2025 and 2026 Wolfgang 2025, PMID 39741438; Morland 2026, PMID 41820235
MDMA-AT pooled symptom effect SMD −1.19 (95% CI −1.95 to −0.42); I²=68.8% 8 RCTs; n=298 for this outcome Meta-analysis Fares-Otero 2026, PMID 41825162
MDMA-AT pooled dissociation effect SMD −0.37 (95% CI −0.70 to −0.04) n=148, k=5 Meta-analysis PMID 41825162
MDMA-AT pooled functioning effect SMD −0.83 (95% CI −1.47 to −0.19) n=227, k=4 Meta-analysis PMID 41825162
† Retracted MDMA phase 2 secondary analyses 3 (notices November 2024); 2 further expressions of concern (December 2024) Sponsor-authored pooled analyses Retraction notices; none is cited as evidence in this condition Mithoefer 2024, PMID 39126501; PMIDs: 39126500, 39126502, 39627911, 39627875

Other pharmacological and drug-assisted evidence

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
SSRI vs placebo, treatment response RR 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.74); 58% vs 35% 8 studies; n=1,078 Cochrane meta-analysis; moderate certainty Williams 2022, PMID 35234292; † identical in the May 2026 version, Williams 2026, PMID 42206608 (search date 13 November 2020)
Pharmacotherapy evidence base 66 RCTs; n=7,442 Adults with PTSD Cochrane review PMID 35234292
Mirtazapine vs placebo RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.22–0.94); 65% vs 22% 1 study; n=26; low certainty Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
Amitriptyline vs placebo RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.38–0.96); 50% vs 17% 1 study; n=40; low certainty Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
Antipsychotics, number improved RR 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.67) 2 studies; n=43; very low certainty Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
SSRI withdrawal for adverse events RR 1.41 (95% CI 1.07–1.87); absolute 9% 14 studies; n=2,399 Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
PE vs sertraline vs combination no difference in 24-week CAPS slope (P=.81) 223 combat veterans RCT Rauch 2019, PMID 30516797
Benzodiazepines no evidence of efficacy for PTSD 18 studies; n=5,236 Systematic review/meta-analysis Guina 2015, PMID 26164054
Repeated ketamine vs midazolam CAPS-5 −11.88 points (d=1.13, 95% CI 0.36–1.91); 67% vs 20% responders n=30; chronic PTSD RCT Feder 2021, PMID 33397139
Repeated ketamine, multi-site no significant group-by-time effect on PCL-5 or CAPS-5 n=158 veterans/service members Multi-site RCT Abdallah 2022, PMID 35046508
TSND-201 (methylone) vs placebo CAPS-5 LS mean difference 9.64 (90% CI −16.48 to −2.80); P=.01 n=65; phase 2; no psychotherapy RCT Jones 2026, PMID 41706459
Psilocybin, open-label phase 2 CAPS-5 −29.9 (SD 14.06) week 4; −29.5 (SD 15.43) week 12 n=22; no control arm Non-randomized open-label trial McGowan 2026, PMID 40883964
Psilocybin, veteran open-label pilot −27.5 points (95% CI 19.9–35.1); d=2.30 n=12; treatment-resistant Open-label pilot Armstrong 2026, PMID 42533157
Pediatric sertraline after burns benefit on parent- but not child-reported symptoms n=26 RCT Stoddard 2011, PMID 22040192
† Ketamine vs midazolam before PE, CAPS-5 at week 22 18.8 (SD 13.8) vs 19.0 (SD 13.7); no analysis posted n=73 randomized; 16 vs 13 assessed Registry-posted RCT results; unpublished NCT04560660 (ClinicalTrials.gov v2, retrieved 2026-10-09)
† rTMS vs sham, PTSD severity post-treatment SMD −0.14 (95% CI −0.54 to 0.27) 3 studies; n=99; 13 RCTs (n=577) in review Cochrane meta-analysis; moderate certainty Brown 2024, PMID 39092744
† Hydrocortisone early prevention, PTSD at 3 months RR 0.47 (95% CI 0.09–2.38); very low certainty 3 studies; n=136; acute-symptom adults Cochrane meta-analysis Bertolini 2024, PMID 38767196

Pediatric treatment

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Pediatric evidence base 70 RCTs; n=5,528 ≤19, full/subthreshold PTSD Network meta-analysis Hoppen 2025, PMID 39630422
Trials testing TF-CBT 52/70 (74%) Pediatric network Evidence-volume share PMID 39630422
TF-CBT vs passive g=1.06 (95% CI .86–1.26) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
EMDR vs passive g=.86 (.54–1.18) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
Multidisciplinary vs passive g=.88 (.53–1.23) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
Non-TF vs passive g=.95 (.62–1.28) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
Parent-involved TF-CBT vs non-TF g=.35 (.04–.66), p=.03 Sensitivity analysis Network contrast PMID 39630422

Prevention

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Debriefing evidence base 11 trials Trauma ≤1 month Cochrane review Rose 2002, PMID 12076399
Short-term PTSD risk OR 1.22 (95% CI .60–2.46) 3–5 months Debriefing vs control PMID 12076399
One-year PTSD risk, one trial OR 2.88 (1.11–7.53) One year Debriefing vs control PMID 12076399

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. Prazosin’s two small positive veteran trials and the large 304-person null PACT trial conflict; no pooled average is substituted for the displayed estimates.
  2. DSM-5, ICD-11 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD select different populations; prevalence and treatment denominators must state the system.
  3. Waitlist-referenced psychotherapy effects are not active-comparator effects.
  4. Carpenter 2018 pools anxiety-related disorders; only its explicitly reported PTSD dropout stratum is used. Its overall CBT g=.56 is not a PTSD estimate.
  5. Pediatric network estimates include full and subthreshold PTSD and 74% of trials evaluated TF-CBT.
  6. MDMA phase 3 efficacy does not imply approval; the regulatory outcome is separately dated and sourced.
  7. Registration status is not an outcome and therefore is kept in the trials page, not converted into a treatment statistic.
  8. Prazosin conflicts at synthesis level as well as trial level. Two meta-analyses (Yücel 2020, PMID 31855732; Zhang 2022, PMID 35661755) identify prazosin as effective for trauma-related nightmares while the largest single trial (PMID 29414272) is null on all three primary outcomes. Both are displayed; neither is averaged into the other, and the difference in included trials and outcome definitions is the reason.
  9. Ketamine conflicts within PTSD-specific randomized evidence. A 30-person trial is strongly positive (PMID 33397139) and a 158-person multi-site trial is null (PMID 35046508). They differ in population (antidepressant-resistant veterans/service members in the null trial), dose schedule and comparator.
  10. Psilocybin figures are uncontrolled. The two published PTSD psilocybin studies (PMID 40883964; PMID 42533157) are single-arm; their within-group changes cannot be compared with between-group effects elsewhere in this sheet.
  11. Registry enrollment and published analysis samples differ. MAPP1 is registered with enrollment 100 (NCT03537014) and reports 90 randomized participants; MAPP2 is registered with 121 (NCT04077437) and reports 104. The published denominator is used for effect estimates.
  12. Trial-level and meta-analytic dropout figures are not interchangeable. The 52.31%/45.77% PE–CPT figures come from one veteran trial with a protocol-specific dropout definition; the 27% IPD figure pools trials whose definitions vary.
  13. † Hydrocortisone prevention conflicts across syntheses. Astill Wright 2019 (PMID 31819037) reports RR 0.21 (95% CI 0.05–0.89; 3 studies, n=88; severely medically ill samples). Cochrane 2024 (PMID 38767196) reports RR 0.47 (95% CI 0.09–2.38; 3 studies, n=136; acute-symptom adults in trauma centres/EDs; very low certainty). Inclusion criteria differ; the included-trial lists could not be compared because the Cochrane full text is unreachable.
  14. † Screening prevalence is not diagnostic prevalence. The eight-country figures (PMID 42731553) use the PC-PTSD-5 screen among trauma-exposed respondents only and should not be set beside the interview-based lifetime estimates above.