Skip to content

PTSD statistics

Last curated: 2026-09-02 (independent audit pass, same date)

Rule. These are source-specific estimates, not interchangeable constants. Diagnostic system, denominator, population, trauma and time horizon travel with every number. No pooled anxiety-disorder effect is represented as PTSD.

Diagnosis and measurement

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
PCL-5 internal consistency α=.94 Trauma-exposed students; 2015 Development study, n=278 Blevins 2015, PMID 26606250
PCL-5 test–retest r=.82 Trauma-exposed students Psychometric study PMID 26606250
PCL-5 veteran internal consistency α=.96 VA samples, n=468 Validation Bovin 2016, PMID 26653052
PCL-5 veteran test–retest r=.84 VA samples Validation PMID 26653052
CAPS-5 inter-rater reliability κ=.78–1.00 Veterans, n=165 and 207 Structured-interview validation Weathers 2018, PMID 28493729
ITQ development samples n=1,051 / 247 UK community / clinical IRT and CFA Cloitre 2018, PMID 30178492

Epidemiology and conditional risk

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
PTSD after trauma in youth 15.9% (95% CI 11.5–21.5) 43 samples; n=3,563 Diagnostic-interview meta-analysis Alisic 2014, PMID 24785767
CPTSD population prevalence 1–8% Mixed populations through 2021 Review range Maercker 2022, PMID 35780794
CPTSD prevalence in mental-health facilities up to 50% Referral-enriched settings Review range PMID 35780794
US lifetime PTSD prevalence 6.1–8.3% United States; 2026 review Review of population survey estimates Flesaker 2026, PMID 42089634
Global PTSD prevalence 3.9% Global; 2026 review Review of population survey estimates PMID 42089634
Prenatal PTSD, community samples 3.3% (95% CI 2.44–4.54) 59 studies; N=24,267 Diagnostic-measure meta-analysis Yildiz 2017, PMID 27865585
Postpartum PTSD, community samples 4.0% (95% CI 2.77–5.71) Same review Meta-analysis PMID 27865585
Perinatal PTSD, high-risk groups 18.95% pregnancy; 18.5% postpartum Same review; referral-enriched Meta-analysis PMID 27865585
Negative subjective birth experience → birth PTSD r=0.59 50 studies; n=21,429 Correlational meta-analysis Ayers 2016, PMID 26878223

Adult psychotherapy

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Adult NMA evidence base 90 trials; n=6,560; 22 interventions Adults with PTSD Network meta-analysis Mavranezouli 2020, PMID 32063234
EMDR vs waitlist SMD −2.07 (95% CrI −2.70 to −1.44) Adult PTSD Network estimate PMID 32063234
TF-CBT vs waitlist SMD −1.46 (−1.87 to −1.05) Adult PTSD Network estimate PMID 32063234
Supported self-help vs waitlist SMD −1.46 (−2.33 to −.59) Adult PTSD Network estimate PMID 32063234
Manualized-treatment evidence base 114 RCTs; n=8,171 Adult PTSD Systematic review Lewis 2020, PMID 32284821
Broad psychological review 64 trials Generally severe adult PTSD Systematic review Cusack 2016, PMID 26574151
Loss-of-diagnosis NNT <4 Exposure, CPT, CT, mixed CBT, EMDR vs controls Review estimate PMID 26574151
Exposure evidence base 65 articles; n=4,929 Adult PTSD Meta-analysis McLean 2022, PMID 34954460
Exposure vs waitlist/TAU large Adult PTSD Meta-analysis; exact effect varies PMID 34954460
Exposure vs non-TF active small Adult PTSD Meta-analysis PMID 34954460
Exposure vs TF therapy/medication negligible Adult PTSD Meta-analysis PMID 34954460
Adult NMA + pairwise evidence base 157 RCTs; n=11,565 Adult PTSD Network and pairwise meta-analysis Hoppen 2023, PMID 37141033
TF-CBT vs non-TF, short term g=0.17 (95% CI 0.03–0.31) 190 comparisons Network estimate PMID 37141033
TF-CBT vs non-TF, long term (>5 mo) g=0.20 (95% CI 0.04–0.35) 41 comparisons Network estimate PMID 37141033
EMDR vs control g=0.93 (95% CI 0.67–1.18); I²=72% 76 trials; 4/27 at low risk of bias Meta-analysis Cuijpers 2020, PMID 32043428
EMDR vs other therapies g=0.36 (95% CI 0.14–0.57); null in low-risk-of-bias subset Same review Meta-analysis PMID 32043428
EMDR vs other therapies (IPD) no significant difference (β=−0.24) Individual participant data IPD meta-analysis Wright 2024, PMID 38173121
Eye-movement additive effect, clinical d=0.41 15 EMDR trials Dismantling meta-analysis Lee 2013, PMID 23266601
Eye-movement additive effect, laboratory d=0.74 11 non-therapy trials; n=849 total Dismantling meta-analysis PMID 23266601
Massed vs spaced PE noninferior (1-sided 95% CI upper bound 2.29) 370 active-duty personnel Noninferiority RCT Foa 2018, PMID 29362795
Massed vs standard PE difference 0.94 (95% CI −4.19 to 6.07) 138 military/veterans Noninferiority RCT Dell 2023, PMID 35440345
Telehealth vs in-person CPT noninferior; pooled −20.5 (95% CI −29.6 to −11.4) 126 women Noninferiority RCT Morland 2015, PMID 26243685
WET vs CPT noninferior (max difference 3.96 points) 169 active-duty service members Noninferiority RCT Sloan 2022, PMID 35015065

Dropout

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
CBT dropout 29.0% PTSD stratum only Placebo-controlled cross-disorder meta-analysis Carpenter 2018, PMID 29451967
Placebo dropout 17.2% PTSD stratum only Same PTSD stratum PMID 29451967
Routine-care dropout range cited 38–51% PTSD EBP routine care Background to randomized analysis Harper 2026, PMID 41926191
CPT–PE dropout trial n=916 US veterans; 79.9% male Randomized trial analysis PMID 41926191
PE dropout 52.31% Same trial Randomized comparison PMID 41926191
CPT dropout 45.77% Same trial Randomized comparison PMID 41926191
TF-CBT dropout, IPD 27% overall 25 pooled trials; n=823 IPD meta-analysis Wright 2024, PMID 39537555
TF-CBT dropout, civilians vs military 23% vs 42% (RR 2.37) Same IPD pool IPD meta-analysis PMID 39537555
TF-CBT vs non-TF acceptability RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.08–1.70) 22 comparisons Pairwise meta-analysis Hoppen 2023, PMID 37141033
PE ≥2 sessions/week vs less often 21.0% vs 34.0% dropout (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30–0.89) 35 RCTs; n=1,508 Meta-analysis Levinson 2022, PMID 35278229
WET vs CPT session completion 76.5% vs 54.8% 169 active-duty service members Noninferiority RCT Sloan 2022, PMID 35015065

Sleep and prazosin — conflicting estimates retained

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Early prazosin crossover n=10; mean 9.5 mg bedtime Vietnam veterans Double-blind crossover Raskind 2003, PMID 12562588
Parallel prazosin trial n=40 Veterans Randomized placebo-controlled Raskind 2007, PMID 17069768
PACT re-test n=304; 13 centres Veterans with chronic PTSD/nightmares 26-week RCT Raskind 2018, PMID 29414272
Nightmare-item difference, week 10 0.2 (95% CI −.3 to .8), p=.38 PACT Between groups PMID 29414272
PSQI difference, week 10 0.1 (−.9 to 1.1), p=.80 PACT Between groups PMID 29414272
CGIC difference, week 10 0 (−.3 to .3), p=.96 PACT Between groups PMID 29414272
Supine systolic BP difference −6.7 mm Hg PACT, week 10 Change vs placebo PMID 29414272
New/worsening suicidal ideation 8% vs 15% Prazosin vs placebo Adverse-event report PMID 29414272
Active-duty prazosin trial n=67; positive on all three primary outcomes Soldiers returned from Iraq/Afghanistan 15-week RCT Raskind 2013, PMID 23846759
Prazosin, pooled vs control g=0.61 nightmares; 0.81 PTSD symptoms; 0.85 sleep quality 7 prazosin trials within N=1,078 Meta-analysis Yücel 2020, PMID 31855732
IRT, pooled vs control g=0.51 nightmares; 0.31 PTSD symptoms; 0.51 sleep quality 8 IRT trials within N=1,078 Meta-analysis PMID 31855732
Prazosin vs IRT no significant difference on any outcome (all p>0.10) Same meta-analysis Indirect comparison PMID 31855732
Nightmare network meta-analysis prazosin and IRT the only effective interventions 29 RCTs; 14 interventions; n=2,214 Network meta-analysis Zhang 2022, PMID 35661755
IRT anchoring RCT nights with nightmares d=1.24; nightmares/week d=0.85 168 women; 114 completed follow-up Waitlist RCT Krakow 2001, PMID 11476655
Baseline standing systolic BP +14-point CAPS reduction per 10 mm Hg under prazosin (p=.002) 32 prazosin, 35 placebo Secondary analysis Raskind 2016, PMID 27320368
CBT-I before CPT greater 6- and 20-week reductions in ISI, HAM-D and CAPS n=110 interpersonal-violence survivors Sequential RCT Pigeon 2022, PMID 34265777
CBT-I integrated with PE no PTSD difference vs sleep hygiene + PE (P=.844) n=94 veterans RCT Colvonen 2025, PMID 40488726

MDMA-assisted therapy

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
MAPP1 n=90 Severe PTSD Phase 3 RCT Mitchell 2021, PMID 33972795
MAPP1 CAPS-5 effect d=.91; p<.0001 Severe PTSD MDMA-AT vs therapy+placebo PMID 33972795
MAPP1 CAPS-5 change −24.4 vs −13.9 Completers Mean change PMID 33972795
MAPP1 disability effect d=.43; p=.0116 Severe PTSD SDS PMID 33972795
MAPP2 n=104 (53 vs 51) Moderate–severe PTSD Confirmatory phase 3 Mitchell 2023, PMID 37709999
MAPP2 CAPS-5 change −23.7 vs −14.8 MDMA-AT vs therapy+placebo LS mean PMID 37709999
MAPP2 CAPS-5 effect d=.70; p<.001 Moderate–severe PTSD Between-group PMID 37709999
MAPP2 disability effect d=.40; p=.03 Moderate–severe PTSD SDS PMID 37709999
MAPP2 severe TEAEs 5/53 vs 2/51 MDMA-AT vs control Arm-level count PMID 37709999
Regulatory outcome FDA declined approval, August 2024; additional phase 3 required USA, 2024 decision Reviews, 2025 and 2026 Wolfgang 2025, PMID 39741438; Morland 2026, PMID 41820235
MDMA-AT pooled symptom effect SMD −1.19 (95% CI −1.95 to −0.42); I²=68.8% 8 RCTs; n=298 for this outcome Meta-analysis Fares-Otero 2026, PMID 41825162
MDMA-AT pooled dissociation effect SMD −0.37 (95% CI −0.70 to −0.04) n=148, k=5 Meta-analysis PMID 41825162
MDMA-AT pooled functioning effect SMD −0.83 (95% CI −1.47 to −0.19) n=227, k=4 Meta-analysis PMID 41825162

Other pharmacological and drug-assisted evidence

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
SSRI vs placebo, treatment response RR 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.74); 58% vs 35% 8 studies; n=1,078 Cochrane meta-analysis; moderate certainty Williams 2022, PMID 35234292
Pharmacotherapy evidence base 66 RCTs; n=7,442 Adults with PTSD Cochrane review PMID 35234292
Mirtazapine vs placebo RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.22–0.94); 65% vs 22% 1 study; n=26; low certainty Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
Amitriptyline vs placebo RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.38–0.96); 50% vs 17% 1 study; n=40; low certainty Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
Antipsychotics, number improved RR 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.67) 2 studies; n=43; very low certainty Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
SSRI withdrawal for adverse events RR 1.41 (95% CI 1.07–1.87); absolute 9% 14 studies; n=2,399 Cochrane meta-analysis PMID 35234292
PE vs sertraline vs combination no difference in 24-week CAPS slope (P=.81) 223 combat veterans RCT Rauch 2019, PMID 30516797
Benzodiazepines no evidence of efficacy for PTSD 18 studies; n=5,236 Systematic review/meta-analysis Guina 2015, PMID 26164054
Repeated ketamine vs midazolam CAPS-5 −11.88 points (d=1.13, 95% CI 0.36–1.91); 67% vs 20% responders n=30; chronic PTSD RCT Feder 2021, PMID 33397139
Repeated ketamine, multi-site no significant group-by-time effect on PCL-5 or CAPS-5 n=158 veterans/service members Multi-site RCT Abdallah 2022, PMID 35046508
TSND-201 (methylone) vs placebo CAPS-5 LS mean difference 9.64 (90% CI −16.48 to −2.80); P=.01 n=65; phase 2; no psychotherapy RCT Jones 2026, PMID 41706459
Psilocybin, open-label phase 2 CAPS-5 −29.9 (SD 14.06) week 4; −29.5 (SD 15.43) week 12 n=22; no control arm Non-randomized open-label trial McGowan 2026, PMID 40883964
Psilocybin, veteran open-label pilot −27.5 points (95% CI 19.9–35.1); d=2.30 n=12; treatment-resistant Open-label pilot Armstrong 2026, PMID 42533157
Pediatric sertraline after burns benefit on parent- but not child-reported symptoms n=26 RCT Stoddard 2011, PMID 22040192

Pediatric treatment

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Pediatric evidence base 70 RCTs; n=5,528 ≤19, full/subthreshold PTSD Network meta-analysis Hoppen 2025, PMID 39630422
Trials testing TF-CBT 52/70 (74%) Pediatric network Evidence-volume share PMID 39630422
TF-CBT vs passive g=1.06 (95% CI .86–1.26) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
EMDR vs passive g=.86 (.54–1.18) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
Multidisciplinary vs passive g=.88 (.53–1.23) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
Non-TF vs passive g=.95 (.62–1.28) Pediatric PTSD Network estimate PMID 39630422
Parent-involved TF-CBT vs non-TF g=.35 (.04–.66), p=.03 Sensitivity analysis Network contrast PMID 39630422

Prevention

Figure Estimate Population/year Method Source
Debriefing evidence base 11 trials Trauma ≤1 month Cochrane review Rose 2002, PMID 12076399
Short-term PTSD risk OR 1.22 (95% CI .60–2.46) 3–5 months Debriefing vs control PMID 12076399
One-year PTSD risk, one trial OR 2.88 (1.11–7.53) One year Debriefing vs control PMID 12076399

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. Prazosin’s two small positive veteran trials and the large 304-person null PACT trial conflict; no pooled average is substituted for the displayed estimates.
  2. DSM-5, ICD-11 PTSD and ICD-11 CPTSD select different populations; prevalence and treatment denominators must state the system.
  3. Waitlist-referenced psychotherapy effects are not active-comparator effects.
  4. Carpenter 2018 pools anxiety-related disorders; only its explicitly reported PTSD dropout stratum is used. Its overall CBT g=.56 is not a PTSD estimate.
  5. Pediatric network estimates include full and subthreshold PTSD and 74% of trials evaluated TF-CBT.
  6. MDMA phase 3 efficacy does not imply approval; the regulatory outcome is separately dated and sourced.
  7. Registration status is not an outcome and therefore is kept in the trials page, not converted into a treatment statistic.
  8. Prazosin conflicts at synthesis level as well as trial level. Two meta-analyses (Yücel 2020, PMID 31855732; Zhang 2022, PMID 35661755) identify prazosin as effective for trauma-related nightmares while the largest single trial (PMID 29414272) is null on all three primary outcomes. Both are displayed; neither is averaged into the other, and the difference in included trials and outcome definitions is the reason.
  9. Ketamine conflicts within PTSD-specific randomized evidence. A 30-person trial is strongly positive (PMID 33397139) and a 158-person multi-site trial is null (PMID 35046508). They differ in population (antidepressant-resistant veterans/service members in the null trial), dose schedule and comparator.
  10. Psilocybin figures are uncontrolled. The two published PTSD psilocybin studies (PMID 40883964; PMID 42533157) are single-arm; their within-group changes cannot be compared with between-group effects elsewhere in this sheet.
  11. Registry enrollment and published analysis samples differ. MAPP1 is registered with enrollment 100 (NCT03537014) and reports 90 randomized participants; MAPP2 is registered with 121 (NCT04077437) and reports 104. The published denominator is used for effect estimates.
  12. Trial-level and meta-analytic dropout figures are not interchangeable. The 52.31%/45.77% PE–CPT figures come from one veteran trial with a protocol-specific dropout definition; the 27% IPD figure pools trials whose definitions vary.