Karlsson WK, et al. Comparative effects of drug interventions for acute migraine. PMID 39293828¶
Scope¶
The analysis combined 137 double-blind randomized trials with 89,445 participants and compared 17 licensed oral monotherapies for acute migraine.
Quantitative anchors¶
- Every included active drug beat placebo for two-hour pain freedom.
- Odds ratios versus placebo ranged from 1.73 (95% CI 1.27–2.34) for naratriptan to 5.19 (4.25–6.33) for eletriptan.
- Eletriptan exceeded other active treatments in network contrasts with odds ratios ranging from 1.46 to 3.01; rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan also ranked highly.
Interpretation¶
Older triptans remain highly effective on average. Newer gepants and lasmiditan add options where vasoconstriction, tolerability or prior failure matters; novelty is not synonymous with greater mean efficacy.
Limitations¶
- Network comparisons rely on transitivity across trials conducted in different eras and populations.
- Single-attack endpoints do not fully capture consistency, recurrence or within-person preference.
- Route, timing, contraindications, adverse events and access can outweigh mean ranking.
- Certainty ranged from high to very low across comparisons.
Knowledge-base use¶
Anchors the acute-treatment hierarchy and supports a measured comparison rather than class-wide adjectives.