Skip to content

Statistics — generalized anxiety disorder

Quick-reference tables. Every figure carries its source, year, population and method. Conflicting estimates are shown side by side and never averaged. All PubMed records were retrieved live on 2026-09-02; web sources carry their access date.

The single most important rule for reading this file: a screening-scale figure, an interview-based disorder figure, a claims-code figure and a pooled anxiety-disorder figure are four different quantities. They are separated below.


1. Prevalence of GAD — interview-based, disorder-level

Estimate Population Criteria Instrument Year(s) of data Source
Lifetime 3.7% (SE 0.1); 12-month 1.8% (SE 0.1); 30-day 0.8% 147,261 adults, 26 countries (WHO WMH) DSM-5 CIDI, face-to-face 2001–2012 Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
Lifetime HIC 5.0% / MIC 2.8% / LIC 1.6% Same DSM-5 CIDI 2001–2012 Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
Lifetime 4.0% with excessiveness removed (vs 2.6% with it) 133,614 adults, 28 surveys (WHO WMH) DSM-5 ± excessiveness CIDI Ruscio 2024, PMID 39364896
Lifetime, developed countries, by duration rule: 7.5% (1 mo) / 5.2% (3 mo) / 4.1% (6 mo) / 3.0% (12 mo); developing: 2.7 / 1.8 / 1.5 / 1.2% 85,052 adults, 17 countries DSM-IV at varying durations CIDI Lee 2009, PMID 19091158
Lifetime 6.2% (US) US adults Review of US estimates Szuhany 2022, PMID 36573969
Lifetime ~5%; current 2–3% US DSM-IV Review Weisberg 2009, PMID 19371500
Lifetime 0.9%; 12-month 0.4% 6,616 adults, Singapore DSM-IV CIDI 3.0 Lee 2016, PMID 27969075
Current 0.57% India NMHS, 12 states DSM MINI 6.0.0 2016 Jayasankar 2023, PMID 38298878
Lifetime 3.5% (95% CI 2.9–4.2); women 4.2%, men 2.7%; rural 3.7%, urban 2.8% 7,270 adults, Bangladesh DSM-5 SRQ screen → psychiatrist interview Sarkar 2025, PMID 41061374
Past-year 2.80%; only 0.53% without any Axis I/II comorbidity 12,312 US adults ≥55 (NESARC wave 2) DSM-IV Structured interview Mackenzie 2011, PMID 21427639
Lifetime 2.6% (95% CI 2.4–2.8) 29,709 children/adolescents 6–18, Iran K-SADS-PL Interview Mohammadi 2020, PMID 32470794
~5% lifetime; up to 10% in women ≥40; ~8% of primary-care attenders General population and primary care DSM-III/III-R Review Wittchen 2001, PMID 11414546

Conflict: the range 0.4%–1.8% (12-month) and 0.9%–6.2% (lifetime) across these rows is driven by criteria set, duration rule, instrument and country — not by sampling error. Do not average.

2. Prevalence — other measurement frames

Frame Estimate Population Method Source
ICD-11 algorithm, self-report 7.1% meeting the ICD-11 GAD algorithm 2,058 UK-representative adults International Anxiety Questionnaire (IAQ) Shevlin 2023, PMID 36215152
Administrative claims 1-year prevalence 2.1% (2012) → 7.4% (2022); incidence 0.8% → 2.4% 1,086,618 US insured adults (Optum) Diagnostic codes Druet-Cabanac 2025, PMID 40611531
Screening scale 18.2% any past-2-week anxiety symptoms (up from 15.6% in 2019) US adults, NHIS 2022 GAD-7 Terlizzi 2024, PMID 39591466
Self-report, diagnosed + undiagnosed 5.3%; only 0.5% reporting a diagnosis Urban China (NHWS 2012–13) Self-report survey Yu 2018, PMID 29524751
Screener, veterans Probable GAD 7.9% (6.7–9.3); mild anxiety symptoms 22.1% (20.5–23.9) US veterans, nationally representative Brief screener Macdonald-Gagnon 2024, PMID 38325107
Subthreshold GAD Roughly twice the prevalence of full GAD 15 high-quality + 3 low-quality studies, 48,214 participants Systematic review Haller 2014, PMID 24886240
Subthreshold vs threshold, Canada Threshold 2.6% (722,000); subthreshold 2.3% (655,000) 24,785, CCHS-MH 2012 Structured interview Gilmour 2016, PMID 27849314
Any 12-month disorder, students 57.4% screened positive (lifetime 65.2%) 72,288 first-year students, 18 countries; weighted response 20.8% Validated screening scales Mason 2025, PMID 40010072

3. Pooled anxiety-disorder figures (not GAD)

Figure Value Source
Global prevalent cases, anxiety disorders, 2021 359.2 million Zhang 2026, PMID 40935255
Global prevalence, anxiety disorders 4.4% of the population; most common of all mental disorders; ~1 in 4 in need (27.6%) receive treatment WHO — "Anxiety disorders" fact sheet, 8 September 2025, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/anxiety-disorders (accessed 2026-09-02)
Anxiety + depression as share of mental-disorder burden 63.1% of mental-health disorder cases; 9.1% of all disease Zhang 2026, PMID 40935255
Change in age-standardised DALY rate, 1990–2021 Anxiety +18.2%; depression +13.4% Zhang 2026, PMID 40935255
Projected anxiety cases, 2040 >515 million Zhang 2026, PMID 40935255
Age-standardised DALY rate, 2021 Anxiety disorders 524.33/100,000 — 2nd of 12 mental disorders after major depression (557.87); largest increase of any subtype Fan 2025, PMID 40375174
Mental disorders as share of global DALYs 3.1% (1990) → 4.9% (2019); 80.8M → 125.3M DALYs GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators, PMID 35026139
Adolescents/young adults 10–24, 1990–2021 Anxiety-disorder incidence +52%, sharpest 2019–2021 Bie 2024, PMID 39691785
Lifetime anxiety disorders Up to 33.7% Bandelow 2015, PMID 26487813
12-month anxiety disorders, US 18.1% Kessler 2005, PMID 15939839
Lifetime anxiety disorders, US 28.8% Kessler 2005, PMID 15939837

There is no GBD estimate for GAD specifically. GBD models anxiety disorders as one cause.

4. Age, sex and onset

Figure Value Population/method Source
Mean age of onset, GAD (with panic, agoraphobia, OCD, PTSD) 21.1–34.9 years; no sex difference detected Meta-analysis of 24 general-population studies Lijster 2017, PMID 27310233
Mean onset, separation anxiety / specific phobia / social phobia Before age 15 Same Lijster 2017, PMID 27310233
Anxiety/fear-related disorders block Median onset 17 (IQR 9–25); peak 5.5 years; 38.1% before 14, 51.8% before 18 192 studies, n=708,561 Solmi 2022, PMID 34079068
GAD symptom onset, prospective cohort Mean 15.6 years; 75% before age 20; annual incidence rises considerably between ages 20 and 40 Zurich cohort, 591 followed 1979–1999 Angst 2009, PMID 18575915
Female proportion 66.5% 1,086,618 US claims Druet-Cabanac 2025, PMID 40611531
Female excess OR 1.62 (p=0.012) Bangladesh national survey Sarkar 2025, PMID 41061374
Age-related item functioning Older adults: higher distress/interference, lower fatigue at equal latent severity 375 clinical participants matched on GAD status/severity Correa 2019, PMID 31938010

5. Comorbidity

Figure Value Population Source
Lifetime any comorbidity 81.9% (SE 0.7) WMH, 26 countries Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
Lifetime mood comorbidity 63.0% (SE 0.9) Same Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
Lifetime other-anxiety comorbidity 51.7% (SE 0.9) Same Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
GAD cases with no other DSM-IV diagnosis 17.1% of 105 cases; MDD comorbid in 70.4% Sesto Fiorentino community study Faravelli 2012, PMID 22578985
Pure GAD / pure MDE / comorbid GAD+MDE, primary care 3.8% / 4.4% / 1.6% >20,000 German primary-care patients, one-day survey Wittchen 2002, PMID 12044105
Confirmed GAD in Spanish primary care 14% total; GAD+MDD 8%, GAD alone 6% (22% screened positive) 7,152 patients; HADS-A screen → MINI Romera 2010, PMID 20541811
Older adults ≥55, GAD without any Axis I/II comorbidity 0.53% of a 2.80% total NESARC-2 Mackenzie 2011, PMID 21427639
Children/adolescents, comorbid anxiety disorder 57.6% 29,709 Iranian 6–18 Mohammadi 2020, PMID 32470794
Pre-existing MDD as GAD risk factor OR 5.06 (95% CI 5.03–5.08) — largest of all measured 1.09M US claims Druet-Cabanac 2025, PMID 40611531
GAD–MDD genetic correlation +1.00 (women), +0.74 (men) 37,296 Swedish twins Kendler 2007, PMID 17121688
GAD heritability ~30%; meta-analytic 0.32 Virginia twins (n=1,033 pairs); meta-analysis Kendler 1992, PMID 1558460; Hettema 2001, PMID 11578982

Conflict: 81.9% lifetime comorbidity (WMH) versus pure GAD outnumbering comorbid GAD/MDE 3.8% to 1.6% at a single primary-care consultation (Wittchen 2002). Both are correct; they are lifetime versus point prevalence in different sampling frames.

6. Burden, impairment and cost

Figure Value Population Source
Severe role impairment, lifetime GAD 50.6% (SE 1.2) WMH, 26 countries Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
Impairment of pure GAD vs pure MDD Similar in magnitude Large representative samples, review Hoffman 2008, PMID 17146763
HRQoL Comparable to depression or panic; GAD+depression significantly worse than either alone Review of 90 articles Revicki 2012, PMID 22154706
Median annual medical cost US $2,375 (GAD) vs $1,448 (primary-care patients without GAD) North America/Europe review Revicki 2012, PMID 22154706
Mean annual medical cost vs other anxiety disorders $2,138 higher (mean $6,475) Same Revicki 2012, PMID 22154706
Painful physical symptoms (VAS>30) 59.0% GAD alone vs 28.3% controls; 78.0% GAD+MDD 7,152 Spanish primary-care patients Romera 2010, PMID 20541811
Past-year suicidal ideation, threshold GAD Men 32.0%, women 21.2% CCHS-MH 2012, n=24,785 Gilmour 2016, PMID 27849314
Cardiovascular events, GAD in stable CHD Annual event rate 9.6% vs 6.6% (p=0.03); adjusted HR 1.62 (1.11–2.37) 1,015 outpatients, mean 5.6 y follow-up Martens 2010, PMID 20603456

6b. Mortality

Source: Wagner 2026, PMID 42136520 — 165 studies, 7,395,722 people with any anxiety or stress-related disorder vs 135,059,023 controls, 27 countries, random-effects meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Outcome GAD Any anxiety/stress-related disorder Comparators
All-cause mortality RR 1.48 (1.23–1.78), n=9 RR 1.54 (1.14–2.08), n=42 PTSD/stress-related 1.39 (1.15–1.67); not elevated in panic, phobias or mixed
Suicide mortality RR 1.93 (1.17–3.17), n=3 RR 2.88 (2.13–3.89), n=39 Panic 3.58 (1.39–9.25); PTSD/stress 3.13 (1.85–5.28); mixed 2.77 (1.89–4.07)
Natural-cause mortality RR 1.55 (1.19–2.02), n=5 RR 1.25 (1.09–1.44), n=19 Mixed 1.26 (1.02–1.56); PTSD/stress 1.17 (1.03–1.33); not elevated in panic
Suicide attempt Elevated across all anxiety/stress-related disorders Range RR 6.33 (4.08–9.82) panic to 2.74 (1.72–4.35) phobias

GAD-specific estimates rest on 3–9 studies each; treat as provisional.

6c. Perceived helpfulness and treatment-seeking

Source: Stein 2021, PMID 34372811 — WHO World Mental Health surveys, 23 countries, DSM-5 GAD by CIDI 3.0.

Metric Value
GAD prevalence in these surveys 4.5% (2.8% LMIC, 5.3% HIC)
Ever obtained treatment for GAD 34.6% (19.2% LMIC, 38.4% HIC)
Of treated, ever considered treatment helpful 70%, comparable across income bands
Modelled probability of obtaining helpful treatment if persisting with up to 10 professionals Virtually all
Estimated proportion who would persist that long 29.7%

Correlates of seeking treatment (NESARC-III; Zech 2024, PMID 39047416): comorbid depression, panic disorder and PTSD each independently raised the odds, as did fatigue, panic attacks, reassurance-seeking and interpersonal avoidance.

6d. Substance-use comorbidity

Source: Alegría 2010, PMID 20923623 — NESARC, N=43,093.

Metric Value
Lifetime GAD with substance use disorder 2.04%
Lifetime GAD without substance use disorder 2.10%
Implication GAD-SUD is approximately half of all lifetime GAD
Treatment-seeking Equally low in both groups; both equally likely to receive pharmacological treatment for anxiety

7. Treatment gap

Setting Measure Value Source
26 countries (WMH) Any treatment sought, lifetime GAD 49.2% (59.4% if severe impairment; 59.0% in HICs) Ruscio 2017, PMID 28297020
Global, all anxiety disorders Receive any treatment 27.6% (~1 in 4) WHO fact sheet, 8 Sep 2025 (accessed 2026-09-02)
India (NMHS 2016) Treatment gap, current GAD 75.7% Jayasankar 2023, PMID 38298878
Bangladesh Sought professional help 3.9% Sarkar 2025, PMID 41061374
Urban China Reported having a diagnosis 0.5% (against 5.3% self-reported GAD) Yu 2018, PMID 29524751
US ≥55 Sought professional help in past year 18% (no comorbidity) / 28.3% (with) Mackenzie 2011, PMID 21427639
US primary care Anxiety-disorder patients with no current treatment 41% Kroenke 2007, PMID 17339617
North America/Europe "Adequately treated" 20–32% Revicki 2012, PMID 22154706
German primary care Correct diagnosis of pure GAD (emotional problem recognised in 72.5%) 34.4% (vs 64.3% for MDE) Wittchen 2002, PMID 12044105

8. Treatment effect sizes — pharmacological

Comparison Effect Certainty / n Source
Antidepressants vs placebo, response (≥50% HAM-A reduction) RR 1.41 (1.29–1.55), NNTB 7 (5–9) High; 20 studies, 7,267 participants Kopcalic 2025, PMID 39880377
Antidepressants, all-cause dropout RR 1.03 (0.93–1.14) High; 33 studies, 11,294 Kopcalic 2025, PMID 39880377
Antidepressants, dropout for lack of efficacy RR 0.41 (0.33–0.50), NNTB 27 High; 29 studies, 11,007 Kopcalic 2025, PMID 39880377
Antidepressants, AE dropout RR 2.18 (1.81–2.61), NNTH 17 (13–112) High; 32 studies, 11,793 Kopcalic 2025, PMID 39880377
Drug ranking, HAM-A mean difference vs placebo Quetiapine −3.60 (−4.83 to −2.39); duloxetine −3.13 (−4.13 to −2.13); pregabalin −2.79 (−3.69 to −1.91); venlafaxine −2.69 (−3.50 to −1.89); escitalopram −2.45 (−3.27 to −1.63) 89 trials, 25,441 patients Slee 2019, PMID 30712879
Class effects (SMD vs placebo) NDRI −1.84 (−3.05 to −0.62); NaSSA −0.91; melatonergic −0.68; SSRI −0.67 (−0.90 to −0.43); azapirone −0.58; anticonvulsant −0.56; SNRI −0.54 (−0.79 to −0.30); BZD −0.40 (−0.65 to −0.15) 91 articles, 14,812 participants, all comorbidities allowed Chen 2019, PMID 31494377
Pregabalin vs placebo Hedges' g 0.37 (0.30–0.44), I²=0% 8 RCTs, n=2,299 Generoso 2017, PMID 27643884
Pregabalin (earlier) g 0.364; psychic 0.349, somatic 0.239 7 trials, n=1,352 Boschen 2011, PMID 21959031
Pregabalin vs comparators (HAM-A MD) −1.23 (2 wk), −1.12 (4 wk), −2.50 (8 wk), −3.31 (6–12 mo); response OR 1.51 (1.31–1.75); discontinuation OR 0.80 (0.70–0.91) 14 studies, n=4,822 Cardoner 2025, PMID 39989902
Benzodiazepines All better than placebo; no differences between individual BZDs; only diazepam differed on tolerability (RR 1.61, 1.32–1.96) 56 studies, 7,556 participants Fernandes 2025, PMID 40544830
Quetiapine vs placebo, response OR 2.21 (1.10–4.45) 4 RCTs, n=2,265 (Cochrane) Depping 2010, PMID 21154392
Vilazodone HAM-A/CGI superior to placebo but NNT 10 (response), NNT 12 (CGI-I), NNH 14; LHH 1.4 (0.48–3.33) 3 RCTs; 844 drug / 618 placebo Zareifopoulos 2017, PMID 28483071
Remission ranking (HAM-A ≤7) vs placebo Agomelatine OR 2.70 (1.74–4.19); venlafaxine 2.28; escitalopram 2.03 (1.48–2.78); duloxetine 1.88 (1.47–2.40); quetiapine 1.88 (1.39–2.55); paroxetine 1.74 (1.25–2.42) 30 studies / 32 RCTs, 13,338 participants Kong 2020, PMID 33343351
Agomelatine 25–50 mg, pooled patient-level HAM-A between-group difference 6.30 ± 2.51 (p=0.012); response 67.1% vs 32.5%; remission 38.8% vs 17.3%; SDS difference 5.11 ± 1.81 3 placebo-controlled trials, n=669 Stein 2021, PMID 33537871
Silexan 80 mg/d Baseline severity predicted treatment effect (p<0.001); psychic-domain items improved more than somatic IPD from all 5 double-blind placebo-controlled trials, n=1,172 Dold 2024, PMID 38425206
Escitalopram fixed dose 10 mg and 20 mg both > placebo; 20 mg not superior to 10 mg; 10 mg > paroxetine 20 mg 681 patients, 12 weeks Baldwin 2006, PMID 16946363
Escitalopram vs venlafaxine XR vs placebo Venlafaxine XR separated on primary LOCF (−2.27, p=0.01); escitalopram did not (−1.52, p=0.09); both separated on observed cases 392 randomised, 8 weeks Bose 2008, PMID 18050245
Duloxetine, paediatric GAD PARS-GAD −9.7 vs −7.1 (p≤0.001, d=0.5); response 59% vs 42%; remission 50% vs 34% 272 youths 7–17, 10 weeks Strawn 2015, PMID 25791145
Cost-effectiveness (UK NHS/PSS, 2011 prices) Sertraline lowest cost, highest QALYs, 75% probability most cost-effective at £20,000/QALY Decision model over 6 first-line drugs Mavranezouli 2013, PMID 23512146
MM120 (lysergide), single dose HAM-A LS mean difference −5.0 (−9.6 to −0.4) at 100 µg; −6.0 (−9.8 to −2.0) at 200 µg; 25/50 µg not significant Phase 2b, 198 randomised, 22 US sites Robison 2025, PMID 40906494

9. Treatment effect sizes — psychological

Comparison Effect n Source
CBT vs treatment as usual SMD −0.74 (−1.09 to −0.38), moderate certainty 65 RCTs, 5,048 participants Papola 2024, PMID 37851421
Third-wave CBT vs TAU SMD −0.76 (−1.15 to −0.36) Same Papola 2024, PMID 37851421
Relaxation therapy vs TAU SMD −0.59 (−1.07 to −0.11); −0.47 (−1.18 to 0.23), ns, excluding high-RoB studies Same Papola 2024, PMID 37851421
Psychotherapy vs control (mostly waitlist) g 0.84 (0.71–0.97); depression g 0.71 41 studies, 2,132 GAD patients Cuijpers 2014, PMID 24487344
Psychotherapy vs medication, pooled GAD Psychotherapy g 0.76; medication g 0.38not directly comparable (different control types) 79 RCTs, 11,002 GAD participants Carl 2020, PMID 30760112
CBT vs placebo (pooled anxiety disorders) g 0.56 overall; GAD in the large-effect stratum; response OR 2.97 41 studies, N=2,843 Carpenter 2018, PMID 29451967
CBT vs controls at ≥12 months, GAD Hedges' g 0.22 (k=10); 0.07–0.40 at earlier follow-ups 69 RCTs, 4,118 outpatients van Dis 2020, PMID 31758858
Individual vs remote CBT SMD 0.96 (0.13–1.79) favouring individual 52 trials, 4,361 patients Liu 2025, PMID 40506439
Metacognitive therapy vs CBT Recovery 65% vs 38% post-treatment; 57% vs 38% at 9 years; GAD re-diagnosis 9.5% vs 23.1% 81 randomised (32/28/21); 39 of 60 at 9 y Nordahl 2018, PMID 30294448; Solem 2021, PMID 34520637
MBSR vs escitalopram (anxiety disorders) CGI-S difference −0.07 (−0.38 to 0.23), non-inferior (margin −0.495); AEs 78.6% vs 15.4% 276 randomised / 208 per-protocol Hoge 2023, PMID 36350591
Yoga vs stress education Response 54.2% vs 33.0%, OR 2.46 (1.12–5.42), NNT 4.59; CBT 70.8%, OR 5.00, NNT 2.62; yoga not non-inferior to CBT 226 with primary GAD Simon 2021, PMID 32805013
Internet-delivered treatment, GAD Anxiety g 0.79; worry g 0.75 20 RCTs Eilert 2021, PMID 33225589
Digital interventions, GAD subgroup g 0.62 (overall anxiety 0.80); guided 0.84 vs unguided 0.64 (ns); digital vs face-to-face 0.14 (−0.01 to 0.30) 47 RCTs, 4,958 participants Pauley 2023, PMID 34047264
Digital CBT vs active psychoeducation GAD-7 d 1.09 (0.81–1.37) at 10 wk; remission 71.0% vs 34.6% (OR 4.63, 2.85–7.54) 351 randomised Parsons 2025, PMID 41396602
Psychological treatment effect on intolerance of uncertainty Within-group g 0.88 (post), 1.05 (follow-up); between-group g 1.35; CBT-IU > general CBT at post 26 studies, 1,199 GAD patients Wilson 2023, PMID 37271039
CBT in older adults vs working age g 0.55 (0.22–0.88) vs 0.94 (0.52–1.36); no older-adult study used ITT 15 studies, 22 comparisons, 770 patients Kishita 2017, PMID 28119196
Collaborative care (CALM) vs usual care NNT 5.27 response, 5.50 remission at 12 months; response 63.66% vs 44.68% 1,004 patients, 17 clinics Roy-Byrne 2010, PMID 20483968
Acupuncture vs sham HAMA MD −2.71 (−4.17 to −1.25); GAD-7 −2.99 (−5.52 to −0.45); certainty low to very low 14 RCTs, 968 participants Jiang 2025, PMID 41312341
Low-intensity CBT (self-help, guided self-help, psychoeducational groups) Anxiety g=−0.63; depression −0.48; worry −0.64 12 RCTs; n=1,201 / 1,164 / 908 Powell 2024, PMID 38166836
Remote CBT, GAD-specific Within-group pre-post g=1.30 (1.03–1.58); between-group g=0.76 (0.47–1.06); low- vs high-intensity not different 10 studies, 1,071 participants Trenoska Basile 2022, PMID 35403706
Digital interventions, interview-confirmed generalized anxiety g=0.80 (vs depression 0.62, PTSD 0.57, OCD 0.68, panic 1.05, specific phobia 1.18) 168 studies, 22,144 patients Harrer 2025, PMID 40703853
Conversational agents, generalized anxiety symptoms g=0.29 (0.21–0.36) 32 RCTs, 6,089 participants He 2023, PMID 37115595
MI-augmented CBT vs CBT alone, severe GAD No post-treatment difference; steeper follow-up decline in worry (γ=−0.13, p=0.03) and distress (γ=−0.12, p=0.01); ~5× odds of no longer meeting GAD criteria at 12 months; dropout 10% vs 23% 85 randomised, allegiance-controlled Westra 2016, PMID 26985729
Acceptance-/mindfulness-based interventions, DSM-5 anxiety disorders ACT and MBCT comparable to CBT; MBSR significantly lower; no differences from TAU or CBT at 6–12 months 23 RCTs, 1,815 adults Haller 2021, PMID 34650179
TMS in GAD (cross-disorder analysis) SMD −1.8 (−2.6 to −1.0), without significant heterogeneity 208 RCTs across disorders Hyde 2022, PMID 35365806
NIBS modality comparison in GAD cTBS and rTMS > tDCS, which showed no significant effect; more headaches in intervention groups 7 RCTs Qi 2024, PMID 39208534
rTMS vs sham SMD −1.857 (−2.219 to −1.494) 6 studies, 152 patients Parikh 2022, PMID 34791241

10. Course, relapse and prognosis

Figure Value Population Source
Five-year remission probability 0.38 167 GAD patients, HARP clinic cohort Yonkers 2000, PMID 10974960
12-year course Chronic for the majority; recovered patients have high recurrence probability HARP, prospective multicentre Bruce 2005, PMID 15930067
20-year community outcome 52% symptom-free, 29% subthreshold, 16% re-diagnosed GAD, 7% persistent 75 of 105 DSM-III GAD cases, Zurich cohort Angst 2009, PMID 18575915
2-year recovery, naturalistic cohort 54.6%; ML prediction AUC 0.67 (sens 62.0%, spec 62.8%) from 569 predictors 887 anxiety-disorder patients (NESDA) Bokma 2022, PMID 32524918
Personality disorder and remission 30% lower likelihood (avoidant 34%, dependent 14%), independent of MDD 514 patients, HARP Massion 2002, PMID 11982447
Relapse on placebo vs escitalopram 20 mg 56% vs 19%; risk 4.04× higher on placebo 375 randomised responders, 24–76 weeks Allgulander 2006, PMID 16316482
Relapse on placebo vs duloxetine 41.8% vs 13.7% 405 randomised responders, 26 weeks Davidson 2008, PMID 18559291
Relapse on placebo vs agomelatine 30.7% vs 19.5% (log-rank p=0.046) 227 randomised responders, 26 weeks Stein 2012, PMID 22901350

10b. Cognition, electrophysiology and inflammation

Measure Finding n Source
Executive function Poorer cognitive flexibility and working memory, not inhibitory control; absent in older adults; both slower RT and poorer accuracy 32 studies, 13,084 participants Nguyen 2025, PMID 40513710
Longitudinal cognition No consistent evidence of sustained cognitive decline 13 studies Li 2026, PMID 42191132
ERP P3 amplitude g=−0.54 (−0.70 to −0.38, I²=20%); ERN amplitude g=−0.42 (−0.72 to −0.12); delayed P3 (0.43), N2 (0.36) and MMN (0.63) latencies 37 studies, 1,086 patients vs 1,315 controls Xie 2025, PMID 39675130
Metacognition Negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of thoughts most prevalent in GAD specifically 47 studies, 3,772 patients vs 3,376 controls Sun 2017, PMID 28763680
Inflammation CRP Cohen's d=0.38 (0.06–0.69), I²=75%; CRP, IFN-γ and TNF-α raised in ≥2 studies; 5 of 14 studies found no difference in ≥1 cytokine 14 studies, 1,188 patients vs 10,623 controls Costello 2019, PMID 31326932
Network bridge symptoms (PHQ/GAD-7) Most central: sad mood, uncontrollable worry, worrying too much. Most frequent bridges: sad mood, restlessness, motor disturbance. Most robust edge: sleep–fatigue 33 studies, 78,721 participants Cai 2024, PMID 38238548

11. Measurement performance

Instrument Threshold Sensitivity Specificity AUC Source
GAD-7 (development) ≥10 0.89 0.82 Spitzer 2006, PMID 16717171
GAD-7 (Cochrane pooled, GAD) ≥10 0.64 (0.56–0.72) 0.91 (0.87–0.93) 0.86 (0.84–0.88) Aktürk 2025, PMID 40130828
GAD-7 (Cochrane pooled, any anxiety disorder) ≥10 0.48 (0.40–0.57) 0.91 (0.89–0.93) 0.80 (0.78–0.82) Aktürk 2025, PMID 40130828
GAD-2 (Cochrane pooled, GAD) ≥3 0.68 (0.59–0.75) 0.86 (0.82–0.89) 0.82 (0.81–0.86) Aktürk 2025, PMID 40130828
GAD-7 (single-country validation) ≥10 0.87 0.78 Muñoz-Navarro 2017, PMID 28666201
GAD-7 (Rational Clinical Examination) LR+ 5.1 (4.3–6.0); LR− 0.13 (0.07–0.25) Herr 2014, PMID 25058220
HADS-A (Cochrane pooled, GAD) ≥8 0.82 (0.76–0.87) 0.74 (0.70–0.77) 0.82 (0.80–0.84) Fomenko 2025, PMID 40600405
GAD-7, perinatal (vs psychiatrist DSM-IV diagnosis) ≥13 (optimal) 0.613 0.727 Simpson 2014, PMID 25161068
GAD-7 MCID 4 points Toussaint 2020, PMID 32090765
HAM-A severity bands None/minimal ≤7; mild 8–14; moderate 15–23; severe ≥24 Matza 2010, PMID 20718076
GAD lifetime diagnosis reliability CIDI test–retest κ 0.53; κ 0.78 without excessiveness; CIDI–SCID concordance κ 0.35 (0.66 without excessiveness) Wittchen 1995, PMID 7666382
DSM-IV vs ICD-10-DCR GAD agreement κ 0.86 Starcevic 1999, PMID 9885394
Diagnostic reliability by method Audio re-rating mean κ 0.80 vs independent re-interview mean κ 0.47, same clinic Chmielewski 2015, PMID 26098046

12. Trial-methodology statistics

Figure Value Source
Placebo pre-post effect, GAD d_av 1.23 (1.06–1.41) — 2nd of 9 disorders, behind MDD 1.40 Bschor 2024, PMID 38809560
Placebo pre-post, comparison disorders Panic/ADHD/PTSD/social phobia/mania 0.68–0.92; OCD 0.65; schizophrenia 0.59 Bschor 2024, PMID 38809560
SSRI vs SNRI improvement trajectory (57 trials, N=16,056) SSRI linear, SNRI logarithmic across 12 weeks; higher SSRI (not SNRI) doses give greater benefit; higher doses of both increase AE dropout Jakubovski 2019, PMID 30479005
App uptake / adherence / attrition (79 trials) Uptake 92.4%; adherence 61.8%; post-test attrition 18.6%; follow-up attrition 28.4% Liu 2026, PMID 41259035
Guidance and completion of digital programmes (22 studies) Amount completed g 0.29 (0.18–0.40); full completion +12 percentage points Musiat 2022, PMID 34802474
GAD trial recruitment failure Three-quarters of eligible patients declined, most refusing randomisation to medication; only ~12% of eligible patients identified; only 5% of those with GAD-7 ≥10 would have been eligible Kalpakidou 2019, PMID 31126337

13. Safety statistics

Harm Value Source
Antidepressant AE dropout, GAD NNTH 17 (13–112) Kopcalic 2025, PMID 39880377
Falls, older adults (adjusted OR) SSRIs 2.02 (1.85–2.20); antidepressants 1.57; antipsychotics 1.54; benzodiazepines 1.42; long-acting BZD 1.81; TCAs 1.41 Seppala 2018, PMID 29402652
Hyponatraemia Antidepressant exposure OR 3.160 (1.911–5.225); SNRI 7.44% > SSRI 5.59% > TCA 2.66% > mirtazapine 1.02% Gheysens 2024, PMID 38403888
Bleeding under SSRIs Adjusted OR 1.41 (1.27–1.57); 42 observational studies Laporte 2017, PMID 27521835
Discontinuation symptoms ≥1 symptom 31% vs 17% placebo (RCT difference 8%); severe 2.8% vs 0.6% Henssler 2024, PMID 38851198
Discontinuation, symptom nature DESS week 1 SMD 0.31 (≈1 extra symptom); dizziness OR 5.52 (3.81–8.01); mood worsening not associated Kalfas 2025, PMID 40632531
Paediatric antidepressant suicidality RR 1.95 (1.28–2.98) all indications; risk difference 0.02; no completed suicides in 4,582 patients Hammad 2006, PMID 16520440
Pheochromocytoma screening false positives 10–22% of urine normetanephrine results above the reference limit; only 0.7% of 12,572 patients compatible with likely PPGL Kline 2020, PMID 31978379
Caffeine challenge, panic disorder Panic attacks in 51.1% of 237 patients after caffeine, 0% after placebo; patients 53.9% vs controls 1.7% (log RR 3.47) Klevebrant 2022, PMID 34871964
MM120 perceptual adverse events Visual perceptual changes in 46.2% of dosed participants Robison 2025, PMID 40906494

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. Prevalence is a criterion artefact. 2.6% vs 4.0% depending on the excessiveness rule (Ruscio 2024); 7.5% vs 3.0% depending on the duration rule (Lee 2009). Neither variation is measurement error.
  2. Four different quantities are routinely conflated: interview-diagnosed GAD (1.8% 12-month), screening-scale symptoms (18.2% past two weeks), administrative-code prevalence (7.4%), and pooled anxiety-disorder prevalence (4.4% globally). Every published "anxiety affects X%" claim belongs to one of these frames and to only one.
  3. Comorbidity rates depend on sampling frame and time horizon. 81.9% lifetime (WMH) and 3.8% pure vs 1.6% comorbid at a single consultation (Wittchen 2002) are both correct.
  4. Prognosis depends on where the cohort was recruited. 0.38 five-year remission in a clinic cohort (Yonkers 2000) versus 52% symptom-free in a community cohort (Angst 2009).
  5. Responder and continuous analyses of the same drug literature tell different stories. NNTB 7 for response (Kopcalic 2025) alongside a best-drug HAM-A difference of 3.6 points (Slee 2019), against a placebo arm improving by d_av 1.23 (Bschor 2024). Nobody has reconciled these.
  6. Psychotherapy and drug effect sizes are not comparable across control types. Carl 2020 reports psychotherapy g 0.76 vs medication 0.38 and explicitly warns against direct comparison; Bandelow 2015 reports the reverse ordering on pre-post effects and warns equally.
  7. Two evidence bases disagree about digital delivery. Digital ≈ face-to-face (g 0.14, ns; Pauley 2023) versus individual CBT > remote CBT (SMD 0.96; Liu 2025).
  8. Two evidence bases disagree about benzodiazepines. Efficacious with favourable safety within class (Fernandes 2025) versus poorly tolerated across drugs (Slee 2019). Neither measures dependence over months to years.
  9. Neurostimulation effect sizes are not credible as point estimates. rTMS SMD −1.86 from 152 patients (Parikh 2022); high-frequency rTMS response OR 291.40 with a 95% CI of 13.08–6490.21 (Duan 2025, PMID 40203547). The intervals are the finding.
  10. GBD does not model GAD. Every burden figure in section 3 is for anxiety disorders pooled.
  11. Guideline-concordant care has not been shown to improve outcomes. 39% concordance in a 721-patient Dutch primary-care cohort; concordant patients were more severe at baseline and improved equally at 12 months, at higher cost (Prins 2010, PMID 20049547; Prins 2011, PMID 22099636; Prins 2011, PMID 20586845).
  12. In paediatric anxiety, treatment type does not predict long-term remission — acute response does. 46.5% remission at ~6 years and 21.7% stable remission across 4 follow-up years, with treatment assignment non-predictive in both (Ginsburg 2014, PMID 24477837; Ginsburg 2018, PMID 29960692).
  13. The GAD-7's cultural bias runs in the counter-intuitive direction. Black/African American participants with high symptoms scored lower than others at equivalent symptom levels (Parkerson 2015, PMID 25725310), which would deflate, not inflate, measured prevalence in that group.

Last curated: 2026-09-02.