Skip to content

Statistics — irritable bowel syndrome

Quick-reference tables. Every figure carries its source, year, population and method. Conflicting estimates are shown side by side and never averaged; a closing section names the conflicts explicitly. All PMIDs were resolved live from PubMed E-utilities and all ClinicalTrials.gov counts retrieved from the v2 API on 2026-09-02.

Reading rule for this whole file: IBS is criteria-defined, so almost every number below is conditional on which Rome criteria (or Manning) defined the population. The criteria column is not optional context — it is part of the measurement.


1. Prevalence

Estimate 95% CI Criteria Population / method Year Source
9.2% 7.6–10.8 Rome III 53 population-based studies, 38 countries, 395,385 participants; uniform methodology required 2020 Oka 2020, PMID 32702295
3.8% 3.1–4.5 Rome IV 6 population-based studies, 34 countries, 82,476 participants 2020 Oka 2020, PMID 32702295
10.1% Rome III Rome Foundation Global Study, internet arm, 73,076 adults, 33 countries 2021 Sperber 2021, PMID 32294476
4.1% Rome IV same survey, same respondents 2021 Sperber 2021, PMID 32294476
3.5% Rome III same study, household-interview arm 2021 Sperber 2021, PMID 32294476
1.5% Rome IV same study, household-interview arm 2021 Sperber 2021, PMID 32294476
9.0% Rome III 5,931 adults, USA/Canada/UK, census-adjusted online survey 2020 Palsson 2020, PMID 31917991
4.4–4.8% (by country) Rome IV same survey 2020 Palsson 2020, PMID 31917991
8.5% Rome V 28,771 adults, 15 countries, population-based internet survey 2026 Sperber 2026, PMID 42613194
6.1% Rome IV 88,607 US adults, online national health survey, May–June 2020 2023 Almario 2023, PMID 37595647
11.2% 9.8–12.8 Manning / Rome I–III mixed 80 populations, 260,960 subjects; country range 1.1–45.0% 2012 Lovell 2012, PMID 22426087
14.1% Rome III or IV pooled 96 studies, 52 countries 2025 Arif 2025, PMID 40359286
13.21% 10.70–15.94 Rome III 26 studies within a 43-study pool, 188,885 participants 2025 Ballena-Caicedo 2025, PMID 41488823
17.14% 12.00–22.99 Rome IV 17 studies within the same pool — direction opposite to Oka 2020 2025 Ballena-Caicedo 2025, PMID 41488823
11.19% / 13.28% Rome III / Rome IV same pool restricted to probabilistic sampling 2025 Ballena-Caicedo 2025, PMID 41488823
12.6% 11.6–13.7 Rome III 3,910 urban adults, Japan/China/South Korea, one instrument; significant between-country differences 2023 Takeoka 2023, PMID 37019867
15.4% Rome III 5,986 Danes aged 18–50, web panel 2017 Krogsgaard 2017, PMID 27865035
28.4% Rome IV 858 US veterans, questionnaire survey 2023 Shin 2023, PMID 35964894
Women 13.8% / men 4.2% self-report 546,246 US veterans, Million Veteran Program; highest in White women (14.7%) 2026 Gasperi 2026, PMID 41489281

Any disorder of gut–brain interaction (context)

Estimate Criteria Population Year Source
40.3% (95% CI 39.9–40.7) internet arm; 20.7% (20.2–21.3) household arm Rome IV 73,076 adults, 33 countries 2021 Sperber 2021, PMID 32294476
40.5% Rome IV Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study 2026 (comparison) Sperber 2026, PMID 42613194
40.9% Rome V 28,771 adults, 15 countries 2026 Sperber 2026, PMID 42613194
28.6–31.7% for any Rome IV functional bowel disorder Rome IV 5,931 adults, USA/Canada/UK 2020 Palsson 2020, PMID 31917991

2. Sex, age and demography

Measure Value Criteria / population Source
Female : male odds OR 1.46 (1.33–1.59); prevalence 12.0% vs 8.6% Rome III/IV pooled, 92 populations Oka 2020, PMID 32702295
Female : male odds OR 1.67 (1.53–1.82) Manning/Rome I–III, 80 populations Lovell 2012, PMID 22426087
Female : male odds OR 1.49 Rome III/IV, 96 studies Arif 2025, PMID 40359286
Age >50 vs <50 OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92) Manning/Rome I–III Lovell 2012, PMID 22426087
Stress OR 2.47 Rome III/IV, 96 studies Arif 2025, PMID 40359286
Anxiety OR 2.93 same Arif 2025, PMID 40359286
Depression OR 2.24 same Arif 2025, PMID 40359286
Smoking, alcohol, education no significant association same Arif 2025, PMID 40359286
Race/ethnicity racial and ethnic minorities had lower odds than non-Hispanic Whites Rome IV, 88,607 US adults Almario 2023, PMID 37595647

3. Subtype distribution

Source Criteria IBS-C IBS-D IBS-M IBS-U
Oka 2020, PMID 32702295 Rome III 33.8% (modal)
Oka 2020, PMID 32702295 Rome IV 31.5% (modal)
Almario 2023, PMID 37595647 Rome IV, US, n=5,414 33.6% 28.1% 33.9% 4.4%
Arif 2025, PMID 40359286 Rome III+IV pooled 26.1% 26.5% 31.4% 8.3%
Arif 2025, PMID 40359286 by criteria 34.2% under Rome IV 26.2% under Rome III
Shin 2023, PMID 35964894 Rome IV, US veterans, n=244 16.8% 47.5% 33.6%

4. Incidence, natural history and remission

Measure Value Population / method Source
Community incidence ~67 per 1,000 person-years Review of population studies Yadav 2021, PMID 34927758
Reported symptom resolution 17–55% across population studies Review Yadav 2021, PMID 34927758
Subtype retention through a clinical trial only 1 in 4 kept baseline subtype Trial cohort, reviewed Yadav 2021, PMID 34927758
3-year incidence 10.3%; three-fold higher in those with non-specific GI symptoms at baseline 5,986 Danes 18–50, Rome III Krogsgaard 2017, PMID 27865035
Persistence 69% of those meeting criteria in 2010 and 2011 still met them in 2013 same cohort Krogsgaard 2017, PMID 27865035
Rome IV criteria retention at 12 months 73.6% (259/352) UK registry, Rome IV at baseline Khasawneh 2026, PMID 41447016
Classification stability at 12 months (Cohen's κ) stool form 0.60; psychological burden 0.54; most troublesome symptom 0.47; 7-cluster LCA 0.37 same cohort Khasawneh 2026, PMID 41447016
IBS-D subtype stability 83% stable same cohort Khasawneh 2026, PMID 41447016
Rome II vs Rome III subtype agreement 46% (κ 0.19) 249 IBS patients Ersryd 2007, PMID 17767480

5. Post-infectious IBS

Measure Value Source
Prevalence after acute gastroenteritis 14.5% (47 studies, 28,170 subjects) Porcari 2024, PMID 39013599
Odds vs unexposed OR 4.3 Porcari 2024, PMID 39013599
Prevalence at 12 months 10.1% (7.2–14.1) Klem 2017, PMID 28069350
Prevalence beyond 12 months 14.5% (7.7–25.5) Klem 2017, PMID 28069350
Relative risk ≤12 months RR 4.2 (3.1–5.7) Klem 2017, PMID 28069350
Relative risk >12 months RR 2.3 (1.8–3.0) Klem 2017, PMID 28069350
Pooled odds at study end OR 5.86 (3.60–9.54) Thabane 2007, PMID 17661757
Persistence >5 years 39.8% still had IBS Porcari 2024, PMID 39013599
Bacterial gastroenteritis, any pathogen OR 5.8 (4.0–8.3); any pathogen OR 4.9 (3.9–6.1) Svendsen 2019, PMID 31112663
Campylobacter 20.7% (Porcari) / 12% (10–15%) (Svendsen) PMID 39013599 / 31112663
Salmonella 12% (9–15%); OR 5.5 (2.3–12.8) Svendsen 2019, PMID 31112663
Shigella 11% (8–15%); OR 13.8 (4.2–45.4) Svendsen 2019, PMID 31112663
Clostridioides difficile 14% (4–29%) Svendsen 2019, PMID 31112663
E. coli 12% (5–20%) Svendsen 2019, PMID 31112663
Parasites/protozoa 30.1% (2 studies) / 41.9% PMID 39013599 / 28069350
Viruses 10.7% Porcari 2024, PMID 39013599
Norovirus (single outbreak) 13%; OR 11.40 (3.44–37.82) Zanini 2012, PMID 22525306
Giardia, 6 years after outbreak Rome III IBS 39.4%; adjusted RR 3.4 (2.9–3.9) Hanevik 2014, PMID 25115874
Travellers' diarrhoea 5.4% exposed vs 1.4% unexposed; pooled RR 3.35 (2.22–5.05) Schwille-Kiuntke 2015, PMID 25871571
SARS-CoV-2 and Proteobacteria OR 5.4 each (highest odds) Porcari 2024, PMID 39013599
Walkerton at 2–3 years 28.3% among 742 exposed Marshall 2010, PMID 20427395
Walkerton at 8 years 15.4%; OR 3.12 (1.99–5.04) vs controls Marshall 2010, PMID 20427395
Walkerton, children 10.5% vs 2.5%; OR 4.6 (1.6–13.3) Thabane 2010, PMID 20179687
Walkerton risk score AUC 0.70; PI-IBS 10%/35%/60% (derivation), 17%/36%/62% (validation) across risk strata Thabane 2009, PMID 19568228

6. Diagnostic performance

Criteria Sens Spec LR+ LR− Population Source
Manning ≥3 vs organic GI disease 58% 74% 361 Mayo outpatients Talley 1990, PMID 2318433
Manning ≥3 vs all non-IBS GI disease 42% 85% same Talley 1990, PMID 2318433
Kruis score 64% 99% 479 outpatients Kruis 1984, PMID 6724251
Kruis score (alternative operating point) 83% 97% same Kruis 1984, PMID 6724251
Rome III (pooled) 3.35 (2.97–3.79) 0.39 (0.34–0.46) 22 studies, 7,106 patients Sood 2015, PMID 26076071
Rome III 87.5% (84.4–90.3) 75.0% (66.3–82.4) 3.50 (2.61–4.84) 0.17 (0.13–0.21) Leeds, n=726 Staller 2026, PMID 42392123
Rome IV 78.9% (75.4–82.1) 81.0% (73.4–87.2) 4.16 (2.98–5.95) 0.26 (0.22–0.31) Leeds, n=726 Staller 2026, PMID 42392123
Rome IV 82.1% 85.1% 5.51 (2.95–11.3) 0.21 (0.14–0.31) Leeds, n=170 Goodoory 2025, PMID 39466700
Rome IV, pain frequency relaxed to 3 days/month 90.2% 85.1% 6.06 (3.25–12.2) 0.11 (0.07–0.19) Leeds, n=170 Goodoory 2025, PMID 39466700
Rome V 66.1% (62.1–69.9) 80.1% (72.4–86.5) 3.33 (2.40–4.74) 0.42 (0.37–0.49) Leeds, n=726 Staller 2026, PMID 42392123
Agreement Rome V vs Rome III/IV κ 0.36–0.55 same Staller 2026, PMID 42392123
Faecal calprotectin, IBD vs IBS 85.8% (78.3–91) 91.7% (84.5–95.7) at 1% IBD prevalence: PPV 9%, NPV 99.8% 17 studies, 1,956 patients Dajti 2023, PMID 37823411
Bristol Stool Form Scale vs stool water content r = 0.36 (p<0.0001) IBS crossover trial Nordin 2022, PMID 36087104
Patient vs physician BSFS agreement κ = −0.01 (7-point), 0.04 (3-category); concordant 18/64 (28%) post-hoc of an RCT Engel 2026, PMID 42289094

7. Test yield and differential diagnosis

Condition Prevalence in symptom-defined IBS Comparator Source
Coeliac disease, seropositive 6% (5–8) Shiha 2025, PMID 40493044
Coeliac disease, biopsy-proven 2% (2–3); OR 4.42 (2.82–6.92) for positive serology vs controls 29 studies, 7,209 patients Shiha 2025, PMID 40493044
Coeliac disease, biopsy-proven (earlier pool) 4.1% (1.9–7.0); OR 4.34 (1.78–10.6) 14 studies, 4,204 individuals Ford 2009, PMID 19364994
Coeliac disease no increase in North American studies 36 studies, 15,256 individuals Irvine 2017, PMID 27753436
IBD, CRC, infectious diarrhoea pre-test probability <1% each Cash 2002, PMID 12425553
Bile acid malabsorption, SeHCAT <10% 28.1% (22.6–34.0), range 16.9–35.3% 6 studies, 908 IBS-D patients Slattery 2015, PMID 25913530
SeHCAT <5% / <10% / <15% 10% (7–13) / 32% (29–35) / 26% (23–30) 18 studies, 1,223 patients Wedlake 2009, PMID 19570102
Diagnostic yield: SeHCAT <10% 0.308 (0.247–0.377) 24 studies Valentin 2016, PMID 26347530
Diagnostic yield: serum C4 0.171 (0.134–0.217) 6 studies Valentin 2016, PMID 26347530
Diagnostic yield: serum FGF19 0.248 (0.147–0.385) 3 studies Valentin 2016, PMID 26347530
Diagnostic yield: 48-h faecal bile acids 0.255 (0.071–0.606) 2 studies Valentin 2016, PMID 26347530
Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (faecal elastase <100 µg/g) 6.1% (3.7–9.3) Rome II IBS-D; 5% (2.2–10.4) Rome IV IBS-D 314 and 140 patients Leeds 2010, PMID 19835990; Olmos 2022, PMID 35704255
Colonoscopy: CRC / IBD / microscopic colitis 0.78% / 4.48% / 2.35% 12 studies, 28,630 IBS patients Wu 2023, PMID 36168183
CRC without alarm symptoms or age <40 <0.1% same Wu 2023, PMID 36168183
CRC with vs without alarm symptoms 2.47% vs 0.11% (RD 2.57%, 0.37–4.78) same Wu 2023, PMID 36168183
IBD with vs without alarm symptoms 8.86% vs 4.25% (RD 10.75%, 4.81–16.68) same Wu 2023, PMID 36168183
Organic disease at colonoscopy, Rome IV functional bowel disorders 12% overall; ~6% IBS-C/functional constipation, ~9% IBS-M, ~17% IBS-D/functional diarrhoea (p=0.005) 646 patients, 98% with alarm features Asghar 2022, PMID 32882424
Microscopic colitis, diarrhoeal vs constipation phenotypes 5.7% vs 0% (p<0.001) same Asghar 2022, PMID 32882424
Colonoscopy yield without alarm features 0 of 11 same Asghar 2022, PMID 32882424
Registry: IBD / polyps / CRC / coeliac in IBS vs matched controls 1.6% vs 5.9% (aOR 0.21); 4.1% vs 13.0% (aOR 0.28); 0.8% vs 6.3% (aOR 0.17); 1.9% vs 3.4% (aOR 0.54) 21,944 Swedish IBS patients Staller 2021, PMID 34420846
Registry: microscopic colitis in IBS vs controls 2.9% vs 1.7% (aOR 1.77, 1.61–1.95) same Staller 2021, PMID 34420846
Alarm features for CRC: sensitivity rectal bleeding 49%; weight loss 12.4% 31 studies, 45,100 patients Frazzoni 2023, PMID 36241197
Alarm features for CRC: specificity rectal bleeding 69.8%; weight loss 91.9% same Frazzoni 2023, PMID 36241197
Number needed to scope rectal bleeding 5.3; anaemia 6.7 same Frazzoni 2023, PMID 36241197
SIBO by breath test, IBS vs controls 35.5% (33.6–37.4) vs 29.7% (27.6–31.8); OR 3.7 (2.3–6.0) 25 studies, 3,192 IBS / 3,320 controls Shah 2020, PMID 31913194
SIBO by lactulose / glucose breath test / jejunal culture 54% (32–76) / 31% (14–50) / 4% (2–9) 12 studies, 1,921 IBS patients Ford 2009, PMID 19602448

8. Treatment effect sizes

Diet

Intervention Outcome Effect Source
Low FODMAP + traditional advice (LFTD) ≥50-point IBS-SSS reduction at 4 weeks 76% (73/96) Nybacka 2024, PMID 38643782
Low-carbohydrate diet same 71% (69/97) Nybacka 2024, PMID 38643782
Optimised medical treatment same 58% (59/101); p=0.023 across groups Nybacka 2024, PMID 38643782
Smartphone FODMAP-lowering app vs otilonium bromide, primary care ≥50-point IBS-SSS reduction at 8 weeks 71% (155/218) vs 61% (133/217), p=0.03; Rome IV+ 77% vs 62%, p=0.004 Carbone 2022, PMID 35483886
Starch- and sucrose-reduced diet RR global symptoms not improving vs habitual 0.41 (0.26–0.67), 2 trials Cuffe 2025, PMID 40258374
Low FODMAP same 0.51 (0.37–0.70), 24 trials Cuffe 2025, PMID 40258374
BDA/NICE dietary advice same 0.62 (0.43–0.90), 8 trials Cuffe 2025, PMID 40258374
Low FODMAP RR bloating not improving 0.55 (0.37–0.80) — only diet superior to habitual Cuffe 2025, PMID 40258374
Low FODMAP vs traditional dietary advice ≥50-point IBS-SSS responders 50% (19/38) vs 46% (17/37), p=0.72 Böhn 2015, PMID 26255043
Low FODMAP vs typical Australian diet (provided food) overall GI symptom VAS 22.8 mm (16.7–28.8) vs 44.9 mm (36.6–53.1), p<0.001 Halmos 2014, PMID 24076059
Blinded FODMAP reintroduction trigger rate by powder fructans 56%, mannitol 54%, GOS 35%, lactose 28%, fructose 27%, sorbitol 23%, glucose control 26%; mean 2.5 ± 2 triggers/patient Van den Houte 2024, PMID 38401741
Personalised diet vs low FODMAP, 12-month follow-up ≥50-point IBS-SSS responders 62.5% vs 34.5%; risk difference 28.0 percentage points (95% CI 4.2–47.7) Tunali 2026, PMID 42623122
Fibre supplementation clinical response 52% vs 44%; RR 1.21 (1.03–1.41), p=0.02, I²=38%, 16 RCTs, n=1,293 Staudacher 2026, PMID 42600900
Psyllium specifically clinical response RR 1.53 (1.06–2.19) Staudacher 2026, PMID 42600900
Fibre, integrative GI symptom scores SMD −0.25 (−0.67 to 0.17), p=0.25 — not significant Staudacher 2026, PMID 42600900

Drugs

Drug Endpoint Drug vs placebo NNT NNH (AE discontinuation) Source
Linaclotide 290 µg od FDA composite, 26-week trial 33.7% vs 13.9% 5.1 (3.9–7.1) 35 Chey 2012, PMID 22986437; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Tenapanor 50 mg bd 6/12-week combined responder 36.5% vs 23.7% (p<0.001) 16 Chey 2021, PMID 33337659; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Plecanatide 3 / 6 mg overall responders, two phase 3 trials 30.2% / 29.5% vs 17.8%; 21.5% / 24.0% vs 14.2% 59 Brenner 2018, PMID 29545635; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Lubiprostone 8 µg bd overall responders (7-point global relief) 17.9% vs 10.1% (p=0.001) 53 (p=0.59) Drossman 2009, PMID 19006537; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Tegaserod 58 (p=0.03) Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
PEG 3350 + electrolytes SBMs/week at week 4 4.40±2.58 vs 3.11±1.94 (95% CI of difference 1.17–1.95); no pain benefit vs placebo Chapman 2013, PMID 23835436
Eluxadoline 75 / 100 mg composite, weeks 1–12 IBS-3001 23.9% / 25.1% vs 17.1%; IBS-3002 28.9% / 29.6% vs 16.2% 32 Lembo 2016, PMID 26789872; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Eluxadoline 100 mg (post-loperamide) composite, 12 weeks 22.7% vs 10.3% (p=0.002) ~8 32 Brenner 2019, PMID 31356229
Ramosetron 2.5 µg global improvement, 12 weeks, 576 women 50.7% (44.8–56.6) vs 32.0% (26.7–37.8); RR 1.58 (1.29–1.94) 6 (4–10) negative, non-significant Fukudo 2016, PMID 26551550; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Ramosetron (meta-analysis) overall symptom relief RR 1.70 (1.48–1.95); 4 RCTs, 1,623 patients Qi 2018, PMID 29310568
Ondansetron (meta-analysis) FDA composite RR of not responding 0.86 (0.75–0.98) 9 Gunn 2023, PMID 36866724
Ondansetron stool response RR 0.65 (0.52–0.82) 5 Gunn 2023, PMID 36866724
Ondansetron abdominal pain RR 0.95 (0.74–1.20) — no benefit Gunn 2023, PMID 36866724
Alosetron ranked first for global symptoms (SUCRA 0.82) among 5-HT3 antagonists 14 Rokkas 2021, PMID 34276193; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Rifaximin 550 mg tds × 2 weeks adequate relief of global symptoms 40.7% vs 31.7% (p<0.001 combined) ~11 negative, non-significant Pimentel 2011, PMID 21208106; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Rifaximin, retreatment responder 38.1% vs 31.5% (p=0.03); stool consistency 51.8% vs 50.0% (p=0.42) Lembo 2016, PMID 27528177
Rifaximin (pooled, 5 trials) RR symptoms persisting 0.84 (0.79–0.90) Ford 2018, PMID 30294792
Peppermint oil RR global symptoms not improving 0.65 (0.43–0.98) 4 (2.5–71) AE RR 1.57 (1.04–2.37) Ingrosso 2022, PMID 35942669
Peppermint oil RR abdominal pain not improving 0.76 (0.62–0.93) 7 (4–24) Ingrosso 2022, PMID 35942669
Peppermint oil (small-intestinal release) FDA abdominal-pain response, 8 weeks 46.8% vs 34.4% placebo, p=0.170 (endpoint not met) Weerts 2020, PMID 31470006
Antispasmodics (pooled) RR symptoms persisting 0.68 (0.57–0.81), 22 trials, 1,778 patients Ford 2008, PMID 19008265
Otilonium same 0.55 (0.31–0.97) Ford 2008, PMID 19008265
Hyoscine same 0.63 (0.51–0.78) Ford 2008, PMID 19008265
Mebeverine RR clinical improvement 1.13 (0.59–2.16), p=0.71 — not significant Darvish-Damavandi 2010, PMID 20128021
Mebeverine (adolescents) treatment success 23.4% vs 22.0%; OR 1.08 (0.59–1.99), p=0.81 Rexwinkel 2025, PMID 40074185
Drug label "mebeverine" vs blinded label treatment success 31.6% vs 14.1%; OR 2.84 (1.52–5.34), p=0.001 Rexwinkel 2025, PMID 40074185
Tricyclics RR global symptoms not improving 0.70 (0.62–0.80), 11 trials, 1,144 patients, moderate certainty 24 Khasawneh 2025, PMID 40258375; Busam 2026, PMID 40471839
Tricyclics RR abdominal pain not improving 0.69 (0.54–0.87), 7 trials, 708 patients Khasawneh 2025, PMID 40258375
SSRIs RR abdominal pain not improving 0.74 (0.56–0.99), 7 trials, 324 patients Khasawneh 2025, PMID 40258375
SNRIs RR abdominal pain not improving 0.22 (0.08–0.59) — 2 trials, 94 patients only Khasawneh 2025, PMID 40258375
All gut–brain neuromodulators RR global symptoms not improving 0.77 (0.69–0.87), 22 trials, 2,222 patients Khasawneh 2025, PMID 40258375
Amitriptyline 10–30 mg (ATLANTIS) IBS-SSS at 6 months −27.0 (−46.9 to −7.10), p=0.0079 (prespecified MCID 35) AE withdrawals 12.9% vs 8.7% Ford 2023, PMID 37858323
Amitriptyline (ATLANTIS) subjective global assessment of relief OR 1.78 (1.19–2.66), p=0.005 Ford 2023, PMID 37858323
Ethosuximide (T-type Ca channel blocker) responder rate 26.6% vs 23.3%; RR 1.14 (0.61–2.11) — negative discontinuation 46.9% vs 21.7%, p=0.003 Kerckhove 2026, PMID 41505133

Psychological and behavioural therapy

Therapy RR global symptoms not improving vs waiting list P-score Trials / patients Source
Minimal-contact CBT 0.55 (0.39–0.76) 0.78 2 / 511 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
Telephone disease self-management 0.57 (0.41–0.80) 0.75 2 / 746 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
Dynamic psychotherapy 0.59 (0.43–0.80) 0.72 3 / 303 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
CBT 0.65 (0.53–0.80) 0.64 9 / 1,150 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
Disease self-management 0.68 (0.50–0.92) 0.58 3 / 375 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
Internet-based minimal-contact CBT 0.77 (0.61–0.96) 0.43 5 / 705 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
Gut-directed hypnotherapy 0.79 (0.66–0.95) 0.39 12 / 1,507 Thakur 2025, PMID 41077057
Telephone CBT (ACTIB) IBS-SSS at 12 months vs usual care −61.6 (33.8–89.5), p<0.001 558 randomised Everitt 2019, PMID 30971419
Web CBT (ACTIB) IBS-SSS at 12 months vs usual care −35.2 (12.6–57.8), p=0.002 same Everitt 2019, PMID 30971419
Nurse-delivered hypnotherapy responders at post-treatment / 6 months / 1 year / 2 years 64.3% / 62.8% / 64.7% / 61.8% 207 of 289 completers Lövdahl 2025, PMID 40491242
Internet exposure-based CBT (routine care) GSRS-IBS 48.06 → 33.06 at 6 months; Cohen's d 1.30 (1.08–1.51) 309 consecutive patients Wallén 2025, PMID 39194012

Microbiome interventions

Intervention Result Source
FMT 30 g / 60 g vs placebo (own faeces), single donor responders 23.6% / 76.9% (p<0.0001) / 89.1% (p<0.0001) El-Salhy 2020, PMID 31852769
FMT vs autologous, colonoscopic primary endpoint not achieved in either group Lahtinen 2020, PMID 32343000
FMT vs placebo, duodenal, IBS-D 57.1% vs 46.4% (p=0.42) — negative; bloating 72% vs 30% (p=0.005) Yau 2023, PMID 37667968
FMT (meta-analysis, 12 RCTs, 615 participants) clinical response RR 1.44 (0.88–2.33) — not significant; certainty very low Lo 2024, PMID 39289768
FMT (Bayesian network meta-analysis) OR 0.46 (0.33–0.64) — favourable Wu 2024, PMID 38999862
Probiotics (network meta-analysis) OR 0.53 (0.48–0.59) Wu 2024, PMID 38999862
Probiotics (82 RCTs, 10,332 patients) strain-specific; only 24 trials at low risk of bias; certainty low to very low across almost all analyses; adverse events not increased Goodoory 2023, PMID 37541528

9. Placebo and nocebo

Endpoint Pooled placebo response Source
Global improvement or abdominal pain (73 RCTs, 8,364 placebo patients) 37.5% (34.4–40.6) Ford 2010, PMID 20412064
Global improvement (73 RCTs) 27.3% (24.3–30.9) Bosman 2021, PMID 33765447
Abdominal pain 34.4% (31.2–37.8) Bosman 2021, PMID 33765447
Composite FDA endpoint 17.9% (15.2–21.0) Bosman 2021, PMID 33765447
IBS-C, FDA composite / pain / stool, ≥6 of 12 weeks 18.9% / 34.6% / 30.1% Barberio 2022, PMID 34425274
IBS-C, same endpoints at ≥9 of 12 weeks 4.3% / 24.5% / 7.7% Barberio 2022, PMID 34425274
IBS-D, FDA composite / pain / stool, ≥6 of 12 weeks 16.2% / 40.2% / 16.2% Barberio 2022, PMID 34425274
IBS-D pain response at ≥30% / ≥40% / ≥50% improvement thresholds 40.2% / 34.5% / 23.4% Barberio 2022, PMID 34425274
Nocebo: any adverse event on placebo (53 RCTs) 32% (26–38); headache 9%, nasopharyngitis 7%, abdominal pain 4% Li 2022, PMID 36606047
Waiting list / limited placebo ritual / augmented practitioner relationship — adequate relief 28% / 44% / 62% (p<0.001 for trend) Kaptchuk 2008, PMID 18390493
Open-label placebo vs no-pill control, IBS-SSS improvement 90.6 vs 52.3 (p=0.038, d=0.43) Lembo 2021, PMID 33605656
Open-label vs double-blind placebo 90.6 vs 100.3 (p=0.485, d=0.10) Lembo 2021, PMID 33605656

10. Burden, quality of life and cost

Measure Value Population Source
IBS-QOL 48.4 (SD 22.3) 752 Rome IV IBS, UK Goodoory 2023, PMID 36544055
EQ-5D-5L 0.570 (SD 0.283) — "comparable to people with stroke, leg ulcers or COPD" same Goodoory 2023, PMID 36544055
SF-36 Lower than US norms and than GERD, asthma, migraine; higher than panic disorder and rheumatoid arthritis community and clinic samples Frank 2002, PMID 12017411
Absenteeism 28.5% (133/467 employed) 752 Rome IV IBS, UK Goodoory 2022, PMID 35794733
Presenteeism 85.6% (373) same Goodoory 2022, PMID 35794733
Overall work impairment 81.8% (382) same Goodoory 2022, PMID 35794733
Work hours lost per week mean 1.97 same Goodoory 2022, PMID 35794733
National extrapolation 72–188 million hours/year lost, UK working age same Goodoory 2022, PMID 35794733
Any activity impairment 91.0% (684/752) same Goodoory 2022, PMID 35794733
Absenteeism / presenteeism (independent cohort) 24.3% / 86.8% 525 IBS patients, Sweden Frändemark 2018, PMID 30254230
Direct cost per patient/year US$193 (Korea) to US$31,113 (US, IBS-C), 2024 US$ 33 studies, 14 countries, 1992–2022 Neo 2026, PMID 42538760
Indirect vs direct cost, Sweden IBS-C US$17,112 vs US$1,943 same Neo 2026, PMID 42538760
European direct cost €1,837/year (1,480–2,195), range €1,183–3,358 by payer 23 European datasets, n=15,157 Flacco 2019, PMID 31002149
European indirect cost €2,314/year (1,811–2,817) 13 datasets, n=3,978 Flacco 2019, PMID 31002149
European total cost €2,889/year (2,318–3,460) 11 datasets, n=2,757 Flacco 2019, PMID 31002149
US IBS-D all-cause cost US$13,038/year; incremental vs matched controls US$2,268/year (78% medical, 22% pharmacy) 19,653 commercially insured patients, 2013 Buono 2017, PMID 28345443
Highest-burden latent class >£1,000/person/year IBS-related healthcare cost UK community cohort Black 2024, PMID 36858142
Ever sought care for IBS 68.2–73.2%; past 12 months 53.8–58.9% Rome IV, US Almario 2023, PMID 37595647
Multiple doctor visits / hospitalisation (adjusted) OR 2.08 / 1.78 US veterans Shin 2023, PMID 35964894
All-cause mortality after IBS identification HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.64–0.88) at >2–5 years; attenuated to 0.92 (0.87–0.98) after >17 years NIH–AARP cohort, 132,697 participants; 5,030 with IBS; residual confounding remains plausible Gutiérrez-Torres 2025, PMID 41518229

11. Stigma, psychological burden and safety

Measure Value Source
Enacted stigma (randomised vignettes) Higher toward IBS than toward IBD or adult-onset asthma; no IBD-vs-asthma difference Taft 2017, PMID 27501483
Negative comments about healthcare providers in expressive writing 54% of 197 comments (11% positive, 35% neutral) Halpert 2011, PMID 21561228
"My HCP thinks I'm crazy" 8% of comments Halpert 2011, PMID 21561228
Wanted vs received "comprehensive information" 96% vs 38.3% Halpert 2010, PMID 19513835
Wanted vs received "listen" 94.4% vs 63.8% Halpert 2010, PMID 19513835
Wanted vs received "support" 88.6% vs 47.1% Halpert 2010, PMID 19513835
Misconception: IBS caused by lack of digestive enzymes 52% Halpert 2007, PMID 17488254
Misconception: IBS can develop into cancer 21.4% Halpert 2007, PMID 17488254
Contemplated suicide because of bowel symptoms — tertiary care 38% Miller 2004, PMID 15625650
— secondary care / primary care / active IBD 16% / 4% / 15% Miller 2004, PMID 15625650
Anxiety / depression / PTSD (adjusted OR) 3.47 / 2.88 / 3.09 Shin 2023, PMID 35964894
Eluxadoline: sphincter-of-Oddi spasm 10/1,839 (0.5%), all without a gallbladder Cash 2017, PMID 27922029
Eluxadoline: pancreatitis in registration trials 5/1,666 (0.3%) Lembo 2016, PMID 26789872
Eluxadoline: pancreatitis share of post-marketing reports 16.4% of 597, 53 hospitalisations; comparators 0.2–0.5% Gawron 2018, PMID 28804032
Tegaserod: coronary/cerebrovascular ischaemic events 7 (0.06%) vs 1 (0.01%); OR 4.24 (0.52–34.74), p=0.273 Lacy 2022, PMID 34048937
Low FODMAP: faecal butyrate 387.3 and 346.0 vs 609.2 (control) Wilson 2020, PMID 32433273
Low FODMAP: Actinobacteria 1.9% and 1.8% vs 4.2% (control) Wilson 2020, PMID 32433273
Low FODMAP: total bacterial abundance 9.63 vs 9.83 log10 copies/g (p<0.001) Halmos 2015, PMID 25016597

12. Research activity (2026-09-02 snapshot)

Metric Value Source
PubMed records, irritable bowel syndrome 21,184 PubMed E-utilities, 2026-09-02 (re-verified this session)
PubMed records, irritable bowel syndrome[MeSH Major Topic] 9,618 PubMed E-utilities, 2026-09-02
PubMed records, irritable bowel syndrome AND (microbiome OR microbiota) 2,797 PubMed E-utilities, 2026-09-02
PubMed records, irritable bowel syndrome AND placebo 1,630 PubMed E-utilities, 2026-09-02
ClinicalTrials.gov registered IBS studies 1,171 ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, 2026-09-02
— completed / recruiting / not yet recruiting / active not recruiting 696 / 111 / 57 / 17 same
— terminated / withdrawn / unknown status 63 / 24 / 185 same
— phase 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / no phase 43 / 177 / 105 / 80 / 592 same
Condition-plus-intervention searches: probiotic / FODMAP / CBT / FMT 133 / 97 / 50 / 37 same
Condition-plus-intervention searches: rifaximin / linaclotide / hypnotherapy / amitriptyline 26 / 27 / 22 / 4 same

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. Prevalence direction across criteria sets. Oka 2020 (PMID 32702295), Sperber 2021 (PMID 32294476) and Palsson 2020 (PMID 31917991) all find Rome IV prevalence roughly half Rome III. Ballena-Caicedo 2025 (PMID 41488823) finds Rome IV higher (17.14% vs 13.21%) and attributes it to a more precise pain definition. These are not reconcilable by averaging; they use different inclusion rules, and Oka's Rome IV pool contains only six studies.
  2. Heterogeneity is extreme almost everywhere. I² was 99.7% (Rome III) and 96.6% (Rome IV) in Oka 2020; 94–99% in the IBS–functional dyspepsia overlap meta-analysis (Andreev 2022, PMID 36286762); 78% for fibre symptom scores (Staudacher 2026, PMID 42600900). Pooled point estimates in this file should be read as centres of wide distributions.
  3. Quality-of-life comparisons contradict each other. EQ-5D places Rome IV IBS alongside stroke and COPD (Goodoory 2023, PMID 36544055); SF-36 places IBS below GERD, asthma and migraine but above rheumatoid arthritis and panic disorder (Frank 2002, PMID 12017411). Different instruments, eras and criteria.
  4. FMT effect estimates point in opposite directions. RR 1.44 (0.88–2.33), very low certainty (Lo 2024, PMID 39289768) versus OR 0.46 (0.33–0.64) (Wu 2024, PMID 38999862), over overlapping trial sets.
  5. Placebo response is endpoint-manufactured. The same trials give 34.6% (pain, 6/12 weeks) and 4.3% (composite, 9/12 weeks) placebo response (Barberio 2022, PMID 34425274). Any NNT quoted without its endpoint definition is uninterpretable.
  6. SIBO prevalence is test-manufactured. 54% by lactulose breath test, 31% by glucose breath test, 4% by jejunal culture in the same review (Ford 2009, PMID 19602448); 29.7% of healthy controls are breath-test positive (Shah 2020, PMID 31913194).
  7. Costs are not comparable across studies. Different health systems, cost definitions, criteria eras and inflation adjustments. Neo 2026 (PMID 42538760) adjusts to 2024 US dollars; Flacco 2019 (PMID 31002149) reports unadjusted euros for 2018 and earlier.
  8. Meta-analysis authorship is concentrated. A large share of the network meta-analyses summarised here originate from a single Leeds-based group, which also authored the BSG guideline. This is a consistency strength and an independence limitation, and it is stated rather than adjusted for.
  9. One value in section 6 is derived, not quoted. Kruis 1984 (PMID 6724251) reports two sensitivity/specificity operating points from the same weighted score; both are listed, neither is a headline figure from the abstract's conclusion.
  10. Registry status overstates activity. 185 of 1,171 ClinicalTrials.gov IBS records (15.8%) carry "unknown" status, meaning no update past the expected completion date.

Compiled 2026-09-02. All PMIDs verified live against PubMed E-utilities and all trial counts against the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API during compilation.