Skip to content

Statistics and effect-size ledger

Purpose and interpretation rules

This sheet preserves reusable denominators, effect sizes, uncertainty, and scope. It is not a treatment algorithm. Unless a row says LUSC, the estimate is from a broader lung-cancer or NSCLC population and must not be silently relabelled as histology-specific.

  • HR and RR below 1 generally favour the first-listed intervention for the stated adverse endpoint.
  • ORs quantify association, not absolute risk or causality.
  • Medians do not describe a typical individual trajectory and cannot be subtracted to obtain an individual survival gain.
  • Cross-trial differences are descriptive; they do not rank regimens.
  • Subgroup estimates are labelled, especially when exploratory or not multiplicity-protected.
  • Source links are PubMed records re-queried through E-utilities on 2026-08-30.

Burden and exposures

Domain Population and denominator Estimate Scope / caution Source
Global incidence, 2022 Modelled worldwide LUSC 616,769 incident cases: 461,171 men and 155,598 women Incidence, not deaths; estimates depend on registry coverage and histology coding [PMID 39914442](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39914442/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Histology share, 2022 Modelled lung cancers LUSC: 29.4% of male and 17.1% of female lung cancers Global aggregate hides regional variation [PMID 39914442](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39914442/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Global incidence, 2020 Modelled worldwide LUSC 351,807 men and 91,070 women; age-standardised rates 7.7 and 1.6 per 100,000 Different model year; do not treat change from 2020 to 2022 as a measured trend [PMID 37837979](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37837979/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Cigarette intensity Case-control analysis >30 cigarettes/day: OR 103.5 (95% CI 74.8–143.2) in men; 62.7 (31.5–124.6) in women Very large relative association; residual confounding and retrospective exposure measurement remain [PMID 22052329](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22052329/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Residential radon 28 studies; 13,748 cases, 23,112 controls LUSC OR 1.43 (1.18–1.74); all lung cancer OR 1.48 (1.26–1.73) Meta-analysis of observational studies; exposure estimation varies [PMID 32102460](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32102460/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Occupational asbestos Pooled men; 17,705 cases, 21,813 controls LUSC OR 1.24 (1.18–1.31) Occupational ascertainment and co-exposure to smoking matter [PMID 28141674](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28141674/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Smoking cessation after diagnosis Meta-analysis NSCLC mortality RR 0.77 (0.66–0.90); all lung-cancer mortality RR 0.71 (0.64–0.80) Mainly observational; healthier-quitter and treatment-adherence effects possible [PMID 34995798](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34995798/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Continued smoking after early diagnosis Early lung cancer cohorts Mortality HR 2.94; recurrence HR 1.86 versus cessation Evidence quality limited, but direction supports immediate cessation care [PMID 20093278](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20093278/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Screening and early detection

Study / policy Population Benefit estimate Harm or implementation estimate Source
NLST 53,454 high-risk participants Lung-cancer mortality reduced 20.0% (95% CI 6.8–26.7); all-cause mortality reduced 6.7% 96.4% of positive screens across rounds were false positive under the trial threshold; this is not the probability of an invasive procedure [PMID 21714641](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21714641/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
NELSON 13,195 men and 2,594 women Men: 10-year lung-cancer mortality rate ratio 0.76 (0.61–0.94) 9.2% had at least one additional CT; referral rate 2.1% under a volume/doubling-time protocol [PMID 31995683](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31995683/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
USPSTF evidence review 7 RCTs; 86,486 participants NLST incidence-rate ratio 0.85, NNS 323 over 6.5 years; NELSON IRR 0.75, NNS 130 over 10 years NLST: 17 invasive procedures per 1,000 screened due to false-positive findings; fewer than 1 major complication per 1,000 [PMID 33687468](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33687468/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
USPSTF eligibility US adults Annual LDCT, age 50–80, at least 20 pack-years, current smoking or quit within 15 years A policy threshold, not an individual biological boundary [PMID 33687470](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33687470/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Community implementation 2,003 screened participants Any invasive procedure 5.1%; invasive procedure for a false-positive nodule 0.4% [PMID 36781101](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36781101/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Comorbidity and benefit Modelled screening cohort Highest comorbidity quintile lung-cancer mortality HR 0.99 (0.79–1.23) Illustrates competing mortality and reduced net benefit; not a universal exclusion rule [PMID 39798695](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39798695/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
CT-occult central LUSC Bronchoscopy referral series; 10,851 lung cancers 115 CT-occult central LUSCs Referral denominator cannot estimate population screening sensitivity [PMID 38443800](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38443800/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Pathology and precursor lesions

Question Evidence Estimate Interpretation Source
p40 diagnostic performance 85 studies; 17,893 patients Sensitivity 0.92 (0.89–0.95); specificity 0.94 (0.93–0.96); diagnostic OR 377 Squamous differentiation, not pulmonary origin [PMID 35126682](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35126682/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
p63 diagnostic performance Same meta-analysis Sensitivity 0.92 (0.90–0.94); specificity 0.83 (0.80–0.86); diagnostic OR 70 Similar sensitivity but lower specificity than p40 [PMID 35126682](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35126682/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Minimal IHC panel 263 prospective biopsies Morphology classified 53.2%; p40/TTF-1 reduced NSCLC-NOS from 46.7% to 14.4%; 90% concordance with available resections Single cohort; tissue preservation remains part of the outcome [PMID 29168459](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29168459/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
3q amplification in airway lesions 19 serial biopsies Present in high-grade lesions, absent in low-grade lesions; 8/10 high-grade lesions progressed Small, lesion-level study; does not validate population bronchoscopy [PMID 20299530](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20299530/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Molecular architecture and targetability

Signal Denominator Estimate Clinical meaning Source
TCGA genomic complexity 178 LUSC tumours Mean 360 coding mutations, 165 rearrangements, 323 copy-number segments per tumour High complexity does not equal many actionable drivers [PMID 22960745](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22960745/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Cell-cycle pathway TCGA CDKN2A/RB1 pathway altered in 72% Common biology; CDK4/6 biomarker matching did not establish efficacy [PMID 22960745](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22960745/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
PI3K pathway TCGA Altered in 47% Broad pathway labels were insufficient selectors in Lung-MAP [PMID 22960745](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22960745/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Squamous differentiation TCGA Altered in 44% Lineage architecture, not a validated drug-selection rule [PMID 22960745](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22960745/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Oxidative-stress pathway TCGA NFE2L2/KEAP1 altered in 34% Prognostic/resistance hypothesis; no standard matched drug [PMID 22960745](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22960745/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
FGFR1 amplification Early validation cohort 22% Amplification prevalence did not translate into reliable FGFR-inhibitor benefit [PMID 21160078](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21160078/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
DDR2 mutation Discovery cohort Approximately 3.8% Compelling preclinical dependency; no validated routine matched therapy [PMID 22328973](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22328973/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
NRF2/KEAP1 protein state Resected lung tumours NRF2 positivity 38% in LUSC vs 18% adenocarcinoma; low KEAP1 46%; OS HR 2.09 for adverse state Retrospective IHC; assay and causal interpretation uncertain [PMID 20534738](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20534738/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Real-world actionability 130 evaluable LUSCs 38% had an alteration qualifying for Lung-MAP, another trial, or approved therapy; 24% of submitted specimens insufficient Broad definition includes trial eligibility, not proven benefit [PMID 31855703](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31855703/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Lung-MAP feasibility and negative-target ledger

Step / substudy Denominator or result Estimate Reading rule Source
Screening enrollment 1,864 1,841 tissue submissions (98.9%) Operational feasibility [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Genomic results 1,841 submissions 1,674 results (90.9%) Assay success among submissions [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Substudy assignment 1,674 results 1,404 assigned (83.9%) Assignment is not enrollment or response [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Substudy registration 1,404 assignments 655 registered (46.7%) Attrition quantifies the implementation gap [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Targeted cohorts 143 treated 10 responses (7.0%) Aggregate hides heterogeneous agents and markers [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Immunotherapy cohorts 315 treated 53 responses (16.8%) Historical platform aggregate, not a current-line benchmark [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Docetaxel control 56 treated 3 responses (5.4%) Small common-control experience [PMID 33125909](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33125909/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Dovitinib / FGFR Phase II ORR 11.5% (95% CI 0.8–23.8); median PFS 2.9 months Amplification alone was an inadequate selector [PMID 27315356](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27315356/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
AZD4547 / FGFR Lung-MAP S1400D ORR 7% (0–17); median PFS 2.7 months; OS 7.5 months No practice-changing signal [PMID 31195180](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31195180/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Taselisib / PI3K Lung-MAP S1400B ORR 5% (0–24) Broad PI3K-positive category failed [PMID 31158500](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31158500/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Palbociclib / cell cycle Lung-MAP S1400C ORR 6% (0–15) Pathway alteration did not predict adequate dependence [PMID 31302234](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31302234/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
TAK-228 / mTOR Biomarker-selected phase II ORR 25%; median PFS 8.9 months Small signal requiring confirmation; not standard care [PMID 36240971](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36240971/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Curative-intent treatment

Setting / trial Comparison Efficacy estimate Safety / boundary Source
Resected NSCLC, LACE Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy; 4,584 patients OS HR 0.89 (0.82–0.96); absolute five-year benefit 5.4 percentage points Histology interaction not significant [PMID 18506026](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18506026/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
LACE by stage Same IA HR 1.40; IB 0.93; II 0.83; III 0.83 Subgroup pattern supports stage selection; not an isolated LUSC rule [PMID 18506026](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18506026/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
CheckMate 816 Neoadjuvant nivolumab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy Median EFS 31.6 vs 20.8 months; HR 0.63 (97.38% CI 0.43–0.91); pCR 24.0% vs 2.2% Surgery 83.2% vs 75.4%; grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs 33.5% vs 36.9% [PMID 35403841](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35403841/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
CheckMate 816 final Same OS HR 0.72 (0.523–0.998); five-year OS 65.4% vs 55.0% Among pCR vs no pCR, five-year OS 95.3% vs 55.7%; ctDNA-clearance association 75.0% vs 52.6% [PMID 40454642](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40454642/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
KEYNOTE-671 Perioperative pembrolizumab vs placebo, both with neoadjuvant chemotherapy 24-month EFS 62.4% vs 40.6%; HR 0.58; pCR 18.1% vs 4.0%; MPR 30.2% vs 11.0% Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs 44.9% vs 37.3%; design cannot isolate adjuvant contribution [PMID 37272513](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37272513/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
KEYNOTE-671 OS update Same 36-month OS 71% vs 64%; HR 0.72 (0.56–0.93) Mixed histology [PMID 39288781](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39288781/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
AEGEAN Perioperative durvalumab vs placebo, both with chemotherapy EFS HR 0.68 (0.53–0.88); pCR 17.2% vs 4.3% Grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs 42.4% vs 43.2%; mixed histology [PMID 37870974](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37870974/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
IMpower010 Adjuvant atezolizumab vs best supportive care after chemotherapy DFS HR 0.66 in stage II–IIIA PD-L1 ≥1%; 0.79 in all stage II–IIIA; 0.81 in stage IB–IIIA ITT Hierarchical analysis, assay/cutoff and jurisdiction matter [PMID 34555333](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34555333/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 Adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo Median DFS 53.6 vs 42.0 months; HR 0.76; PD-L1 ≥50% HR 0.82, not significant at interim analysis Mixed histology; PD-L1 pattern differed from a simple enrichment expectation [PMID 36108662](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36108662/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
PACIFIC primary Durvalumab vs placebo after concurrent chemoradiation Median PFS 16.8 vs 5.6 months; HR 0.52; OS HR 0.68; 24-month OS 66.3% vs 55.6% Unresectable stage III, mixed histology [PMID 28885881](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28885881/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}; [PMID 30280658](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30280658/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
PACIFIC five-year Same Five-year OS 42.9% vs 33.4%; five-year PFS 33.1% vs 19.0% Long-term landmark; subsequent therapies can affect OS [PMID 35108059](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35108059/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Metastatic and recurrent treatment

Trial / setting Comparison Efficacy estimate Safety / interpretation Source
KEYNOTE-407 Pembrolizumab + carboplatin/taxane vs chemotherapy in 559 metastatic LUSCs OS 15.9 vs 11.3 months; HR 0.64 (0.49–0.85); PFS 6.4 vs 4.8 months; HR 0.56 (0.45–0.70) Grade ≥3 AEs 69.8% vs 68.2%; direct LUSC evidence [PMID 30280635](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30280635/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
KEYNOTE-407 five-year Same OS HR 0.71 (0.59–0.85); PFS HR 0.62 (0.52–0.74); five-year OS 18.4% vs 9.7% Long-term tail does not identify beforehand who benefits [PMID 36735893](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36735893/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
KEYNOTE-407 PRO Same Week-18 global health/QoL between-group difference 4.9 points (1.4–8.3) Group mean can conceal severe individual toxicity and attrition [PMID 31751163](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31751163/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
CheckMate 017 Nivolumab vs docetaxel after platinum in LUSC OS 9.2 vs 6.0 months; HR 0.59 (0.44–0.79); one-year OS 42% vs 24%; ORR 20% vs 9% Grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs 7% vs 55%; direct LUSC evidence [PMID 26028407](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26028407/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
CheckMate 227 Nivolumab + ipilimumab vs chemotherapy, PD-L1 ≥1% NSCLC OS 17.1 vs 14.9 months; two-year OS 40.0% vs 32.8% NSCLC-wide; CTLA-4 toxicity and early progression matter [PMID 31562796](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31562796/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
POSEIDON Tremelimumab + durvalumab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy OS HR 0.77 (0.65–0.92), medians 14.0 vs 11.7 months; PFS HR 0.72 Grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs 51.8% vs 44.4%; mixed histology [PMID 36327426](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36327426/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
REVEL Ramucirumab + docetaxel vs docetaxel after platinum; 1,253 NSCLCs OS 10.5 vs 9.1 months; HR 0.86 (0.75–0.98); PFS 4.5 vs 3.0 months; HR 0.76 (0.68–0.86) Modest absolute effect; neutropenia and bleeding-risk selection [PMID 24933332](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24933332/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
LUX-Lung 8 Afatinib vs erlotinib in pretreated LUSC PFS 2.4 vs 1.9 months; HR 0.82; OS 7.9 vs 6.8 months; HR 0.81 Limited modern niche; not equivalent to EGFR-mutant targeted therapy [PMID 26156651](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26156651/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
TROPION-Lung01 LUSC subgroup Datopotamab deruxtecan vs docetaxel PFS 2.8 vs 3.9 months; HR 1.41 (0.95–2.08); OS 7.6 vs 9.4 months; HR 1.32 (0.91–1.92) Histology subgroup was unfavourable; an all-NSCLC headline is misleading [PMID 39250535](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39250535/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Metastatic patterns, supportive care, and lived outcomes

Context Denominator / comparison Estimate Boundary Source
Selected untreated brain metastases Pembrolizumab phase II; PD-L1-positive cohort Intracranial response 11/37, 29.7% (15.9–47.0); none in PD-L1-negative/unevaluable cohort Asymptomatic 5–20-mm lesions; cannot justify deferring urgent local therapy [PMID 32251621](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32251621/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Oligometastatic consolidation Randomized phase II; 49 patients PFS 14.2 vs 4.4 months; OS 41.2 vs 17.0 months Small, early-closed, selected NSCLC study from an older systemic era [PMID 31067138](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31067138/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Bone metastases Exploratory lung subgroup: denosumab vs zoledronic acid NSCLC OS 9.5 vs 8.0 months, HR 0.78; LUSC 8.6 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.68 Exploratory, not multiplicity-protected; do not choose solely for survival [PMID 23154554](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23154554/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Early palliative care Randomized metastatic NSCLC; 151 patients FACT-L at 12 weeks 98.0 vs 91.5; depression 16% vs 38%; aggressive end-of-life care 33% vs 54%; OS 11.6 vs 8.9 months Single-centre landmark; supports concurrent, needs-based palliative care [PMID 20818875](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20818875/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}
Postoperative pulmonary complications 34 studies; 31,696 lung-cancer resections Pooled complication incidence 18.4% Definitions and procedure mix heterogeneous; use for counselling, not individual prediction [PMID 38975138](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38975138/){target="_blank" rel="noopener"}

Reuse checklist

Before copying a number into a page, presentation, or decision aid:

  1. preserve the population and histology;
  2. preserve whether the endpoint is OS, PFS, EFS, DFS, pCR, response, toxicity, or quality of life;
  3. include the CI when reported here;
  4. retain the comparator and time point;
  5. distinguish randomized estimates from exploratory subgroups and observational associations;
  6. do not turn a relative effect into an absolute benefit without the baseline risk;
  7. re-check guideline status, authorization, and registry status at the date of use.

Linked evidence layers