Skip to content

Statistics sheet — asthma

Last curated: 2026-08-30. Every PMID was re-resolved through live PubMed E-utilities during the audit. Values preserve the study population, comparator and uncertainty; they should not be mixed across settings without recalibration.

1. Global burden

Figure Population / method Source
260 million prevalent asthma cases (95% uncertainty interval 227–298 million) in 2021 GBD 2021, 204 countries/territories GBD 2021 Asthma and Allergic Diseases Collaborators 2025, PMID 40147466
436,000 asthma deaths in 2021 GBD 2021 modeled estimate; the point estimate was retained, but an uncertainty interval not reproduced in the live record was removed during audit PMID 40147466
Age-standardized prevalence fell 40.0% from 5,568.3 to 3,340.1 per 100,000, 1990–2021 GBD 2021 PMID 40147466
275 million projected cases (95% UI 224–330 million) in 2050 GBD forecast; population growth dominant PMID 40147466
Modifiable factors accounted for 29.9% of asthma DALYs High BMI, occupational asthmagens, smoking and NO2 modeled PMID 40147466
South Asia age-standardized asthma DALY rate 465.0 per 100,000 (95% UI 357.2–648.9) Highest GBD super-region estimate in 2021 PMID 40147466

2. Diagnostic accuracy and instability

FeNO diagnosis

Metric Estimate Source
Sensitivity 0.65 (95% CI 0.58–0.72) 26 studies, 4,518 participants; Karrasch 2017, PMID 27388487
Specificity 0.82 (0.76–0.86) Same meta-analysis
Diagnostic odds ratio 9.23 (6.55–13.01) Same meta-analysis
AUC 0.80 (0.77–0.85) Same meta-analysis
Specificity increase per 10-ppb higher threshold OR 1.46 Same meta-regression

Reassessment of community diagnosis

Figure Population / method Source
Current asthma ruled out in 203/613, 33.1% (95% CI 29.4–36.8) Canadian multicenter taper, spirometry and serial challenge Aaron 2017, PMID 28114551
No evidence remained at 12 months in 181/613, 29.5% (25.9–33.1) Prospective follow-up PMID 28114551
Serious cardiorespiratory alternative diagnosis in 12/613, 2.0% Same cohort PMID 28114551
Objective airflow testing at original diagnosis: 43.8% when later ruled out vs 55.6% when confirmed Absolute difference 11.8% (2.1–21.5) PMID 28114551

3. Mild asthma and reliever trials

START

Outcome Budesonide Placebo Effect
Participants with severe event 117/3,597 198/3,568 HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.45–0.71)
Post-BD FEV1 advantage +1.48 percentage points year 1; +0.88 year 3
Growth under age 11 −1.34 cm over 3 years

Source: Pauwels 2003, PMID 12672309.

SYGMA 1

Outcome Terbutaline PRN Budesonide–formoterol PRN Maintenance budesonide
Well-controlled weeks 31.1% 34.4% 44.4%
Severe attacks/year 0.20 0.07 0.09
PRN budesonide–formoterol effect Reference RR 0.36 (0.27–0.49) vs maintenance RR 0.83 (0.59–1.16)
Median metered ICS/day 0 57 μg 340 μg

Source: O'Byrne 2018, PMID 29768149.

SYGMA 2 and pragmatic trials

Trial / outcome Estimate Source
SYGMA 2 severe attacks/year 0.11 PRN ICS–formoterol vs 0.12 maintenance budesonide; RR 0.97, upper one-sided 95% limit 1.16 Bateman 2018, PMID 29768147
SYGMA 2 median metered ICS 66 vs 267 μg/day PMID 29768147
Novel START exacerbations/year 0.195 PRN budesonide–formoterol vs 0.400 albuterol; RR 0.49 (0.33–0.72) Beasley 2019, PMID 31112386
CARE children attacks/year 0.23 PRN budesonide–formoterol vs 0.41 salbutamol; RR 0.55 (0.35–0.86) Hatter 2025, PMID 41033330
Pooled ICS–formoterol vs SABA severe attacks RR 0.65 (0.60–0.72); risk difference −10.3% (−11.8 to −8.3) Rayner 2025, PMID 39465893
Pooled ICS–SABA vs SABA severe attacks RR 0.84 (0.73–0.95); risk difference −4.7% (−8.0 to −1.5) PMID 39465893

4. Severe asthma biologics

Trial Population Primary attack result Other anchor
DREAM mepolizumab 621 recurrent-attack eosinophilic severe asthma 2.40/year placebo vs 1.24, 1.46, 1.15 across doses; reductions 48%, 39%, 52% No clear dose gradient
SIROCCO benralizumab Severe eosinophilic asthma Significant attack reduction in eosinophil-enriched population Lung-function response varied by regimen
LIBERTY QUEST dupilumab 1,902 uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma Severe exacerbation RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.41–0.66) for 200-mg regimen vs placebo FEV1 +0.14 L vs placebo
NAVIGATOR tezepelumab 1,061 severe uncontrolled asthma 0.93 vs 2.10/year; RR 0.44 (0.37–0.53) FEV1 difference +0.13 L (0.08–0.18)
NAVIGATOR eosinophils <300 Prespecified subgroup 1.02 vs 1.73/year; RR 0.59 (0.46–0.75) Broad but not biomarker-independent benefit

5. Triple therapy

Figure Evidence Source
Severe exacerbation: 22.7% triple vs 27.4% dual RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77–0.90) 20 RCTs, 11,894 participants; Kim 2021, PMID 34009257
Symptom/QOL changes Average differences did not reach minimal important differences Same meta-analysis

6. Preschool and childhood asthma

Figure Population Source
Daily medium-dose ICS vs placebo severe attacks RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.61–0.79), NNT 9 22 trials, 4,550 preschool children; Kaiser 2016, PMID 27230765
Persistent-asthma subgroup RR 0.56 (0.46–0.70), NNT 11 Same meta-analysis
Daily ICS vs montelukast RR 0.59 (0.38–0.92) One trial within same review
MIST daily vs intermittent budesonide 0.97 (0.76–1.22) vs 0.95 (0.75–1.20) OCS-requiring attacks/year 278 high-risk preschoolers; Zeiger 2011, PMID 22111718
CAMP hospitalization 2.5 vs 4.4 per 100 person-years, budesonide vs placebo 1,041 children, 4–6 years; PMID 11027739
CAMP urgent visits 12 vs 22 per 100 person-years PMID 11027739
CAMP height gain 1.1 cm less with budesonide PMID 11027739
ICS >12 months, first-year growth velocity −0.48 cm/year (95% CI −0.66 to −0.29) 16 RCTs; Loke 2015, PMID 26191797
Adult height, budesonide trial −1.20 cm (−1.90 to −0.50) Same systematic review
CAMP early-adult clinical remission 26.0% 879 participants; Wang 2019, PMID 30445065
CAMP strict remission 15.0% 741 with airway-responsiveness data; PMID 30445065

7. Inhaler technique and adherence

Figure Evidence Source
Overall device errors 50–100% across included studies Chrystyn 2017, PMID 28373682
Critical device errors 14–92%; heterogeneity generally >90% PMID 28373682
Education and critical errors RR 0.28 (95% CI 0.17–0.47) Marko 2025, PMID 40102397
Education and any dry-powder error RR 0.38 (0.21–0.70) PMID 40102397
Education and any MDI error RR 0.16 (0.11–0.23) PMID 40102397
Mean ICS adherence 22–63% across studies Bårnes 2015, PMID 25118311
Pediatric adherence intervention Hedges g 0.39 (0.24–0.54) post-intervention; follow-up g 0.38 (−0.08 to 0.83) Fidler 2021, PMID 34343294
Pharmacist-led adherence intervention SMD 0.49 (0.35–0.64) Mes 2018, PMID 29976652
Electronic-monitor adherence Random-effects SMD 0.41 (0.22–0.60) Garin 2023, PMID 36986513

8. Supported self-management

Outcome Effect Source
Hospitalization RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.50–0.82) 36 trials; Gibson 2003, PMID 12535399
Emergency visits RR 0.82 (0.73–0.94) Same review
Unscheduled clinician visits RR 0.68 (0.56–0.81) Same review
Work/school absence RR 0.79 (0.67–0.93) Same review
Nocturnal asthma RR 0.67 (0.56–0.79) Same review
Quality of life SMD 0.29 (0.11–0.47) Same review
School program ED visits OR 0.70 (0.53–0.92) Kneale 2019, PMID 30686788
School program hospitalization SMD −0.19 (−0.35 to −0.04) Same review

9. Biomarkers

Marker strategy Effect Source
Sputum-guided therapy, ≥1 attack 62 vs 82 per 100; OR 0.36 (0.21–0.62) Petsky 2018, PMID 29858277
Adult FeNO-guided, ≥1 attack OR 0.61 (0.44–0.83) 12 RCTs, 2,116 adults; Korevaar 2023, PMID 37293870
Adult FeNO-guided attack rate RR 0.67 (0.54–0.82) Same review
Pediatric FeNO-guided, children with attacks RR 0.73 (0.63–0.84) 23 RCTs; Wang 2020, PMID 32525611
Pediatric FeNO-guided ICS dose +64.17 μg/day (53.59–74.75) Same review
Serum periostin diagnosis Sensitivity 0.68 (0.42–0.86), specificity 0.87 (0.76–0.93) Jia 2021, PMID 31738608

10. Comorbidity and mimics

Figure Population / caveat Source
Laryngeal dysfunction prevalence 25% (95% CI 15–37), I²=96%; selected asthma cohorts with objective laryngoscopy Lee 2020, PMID 31940470
Bronchiectasis prevalence 36.6% (307/839); selected CT-imaged cohorts Zhang 2021, PMID 33530179
Bronchiectasis FEV1/FVC difference −2.71 percentage points (−3.72 to −1.69) Same meta-analysis
Bronchiectasis attack difference +0.68/year (0.03–1.33) Same meta-analysis
OSA prevalence in adult asthma 49.5% (36.4–62.6) Kong 2017, PMID 28642543
Asthma–OSA association OR 2.64 (1.76–3.52) Same meta-analysis
GERD–asthma exacerbation association OR 1.27 (1.18–1.35) 32 studies, 1.61 million; Mallah 2022, PMID 34448255
Allergic-rhinitis association with asthma OR 4.24 (3.82–4.71) Rogliani 2023, PMID 36889783

11. Pregnancy

Outcome in maternal asthma Relative risk (95% CI) Source
Low birthweight 1.46 (1.22–1.75) Murphy 2011, PMID 21749633
Small for gestational age 1.22 (1.14–1.31) Same meta-analysis
Preterm delivery 1.41 (1.22–1.61) Same meta-analysis
Pre-eclampsia 1.54 (1.32–1.81) Same meta-analysis
Preterm delivery under active management 1.07 (0.91–1.26) Subgroup, same meta-analysis
Exacerbation risk: obesity RR 1.25 (1.15–1.37) Robijn 2022, PMID 35705210
Exacerbation risk: smoking RR 1.35 (1.04–1.75) Same review
Exacerbation risk: depression/anxiety RR 1.42 (1.27–1.59) Same review
Exacerbation risk: moderate–severe vs mild RR 3.44 (2.03–5.83) Same review

12. SABA and systemic steroid safety

Figure Evidence Source
SABA overuse prevalence 30% collected ≥3 canisters in baseline year Swedish cohort n=365,324; Nwaru 2020, PMID 31949111
Attack risk, 3–5 canisters HR 1.26 (1.24–1.28) Same cohort
Attack risk, 6–10 canisters HR 1.44 (1.41–1.46) Same cohort
SABA ≥3 canisters and mortality RR 2.04 (1.37–3.04) 27-study meta-analysis; Tsao 2025, PMID 40491263
Systemic steroid and osteoporosis/fracture adjusted HR 3.11 (1.87–5.19) Matched cohort; Price 2018, PMID 30214247
Systemic steroid and pneumonia HR 2.68 (2.30–3.11) Same cohort
OCS and osteoporosis pooled HR 1.76 (1.48–2.09) Chalitsios 2021, PMID 33799052
Severe-asthma registry ≥500 mg OCS/year 44% Politis 2024, PMID 38622806
Severe-asthma registry ≥1,000 mg OCS/year 32% Same registry

13. Inequity and patient priorities

Figure Evidence Source
Lowest vs highest income attack odds OR 1.25 (1.13–1.37) Gassasse 2025, PMID 40688041
Same, children OR 1.36 (1.23–1.50) Same meta-analysis
Same, adults OR 1.19 (1.05–1.33) Same meta-analysis
Lower SES and ED attendance OR 1.61 (1.40–1.84) Redmond 2022, PMID 34673047
Lower SES and hospitalization OR 1.63 (1.34–1.99) Same review
Patient goals aligning with clinician goals 53% Severe-asthma cohorts; Mulvey 2021, PMID 33577946
Severe Asthma Questionnaire test–retest ICC 0.93 Hyland 2018, PMID 29794132

Known conflicts and interpretation caveats

  1. GBD uncertainty intervals are modeled uncertainty, not sampling confidence intervals.
  2. Trial relative effects require the comparator’s baseline event rate for individual absolute benefit.
  3. Observational SABA/OCS associations include confounding by disease severity, but dose-response supports safety action.
  4. Diagnostic sensitivity/specificity changes with threshold, spectrum, treatment and reference standard.
  5. Biomarker thresholds are drug-, assay-, age- and population-specific.
  6. Prevalence estimates from specialty or imaged cohorts should not be applied to community asthma.
  7. “Remission” definitions differ and must specify on-treatment versus off-treatment state.