Osteoarthritis patient-voice layer¶
Last updated: 2026-08-30
Purpose¶
This layer records recurring patient-experience themes that affect research questions, outcome choice and service design. It is not a collection of testimonials and does not substitute for prevalence research.
Method¶
- PubMed E-utilities searches covered OA qualitative experience, beliefs about exercise, work, treatment preferences, arthroplasty waiting/cancellation, stigma, decision aids and acceptable symptom states.
- Eligible sources were public peer-reviewed qualitative studies, mixed-methods reviews, preference studies, decision-aid trials and public patient-organization resources.
- Themes required at least two independent sources; a single vivid account never defined a theme.
- Organization pages were fetched live and recorded with access date in organizations.md.
- Findings were paraphrased and organized in aggregate; no private individual's name, handle, location or identifying detail was recorded.
Ethics and interpretation¶
- Public sources only.
- No private groups, closed forums or direct messages.
- Paraphrase by default; quotations, if ever used, must be ≤15 words and attributed. This build uses no individual quotation.
- Organization pages are services and advocacy material, not representative samples.
- Qualitative saturation within one study does not establish population prevalence.
- The literature is weighted toward knee OA, English-language high-income settings, physiotherapy and arthroplasty pathways.
- Absence of a theme means “not established in the searched sources,” not “patients do not experience it.”
Files¶
- organizations.md — verified public support and advocacy organizations.
- themes.md — cross-source thematic synthesis.
- sources.md — annotated source catalog and coverage limitations.