Skip to content

Open questions — type 2 diabetes

Last curated: 2026-08-30

Stable IDs persist across future updates. A question moves to “answered” only when the relevant outcome—not merely a surrogate—has adequate evidence.

Tier 1 — practice-changing and designable now

OQ-1 — How should remission durability be increased?

DiRECT remission fell from 46% at one year to 36% at two years and 13% in the five-year extension group; maintained weight loss is strongly associated with persistence, but β-cell reserve and environment may explain additional relapse (Lean 2018, PMID 29221645; Lean 2019, PMID 30852132; Lean 2024, PMID 38423026). A factorial maintenance trial could compare behavioural intensity, intermittent formula diet and pharmacologic maintenance, stratified by duration/C-peptide.

OQ-2 — What should drug-dependent normoglycaemia be called and measured as?

Consensus remission requires HbA1c <6.5% without glucose-lowering medication, excluding clinically valuable normoglycaemia during GLP-1/tirzepatide therapy (Riddle 2021, PMID 34462270; Frías 2021, PMID 34170647). A 2026 review now proposes “pharmacological remission,” and a 14,141-person observational study produced frequencies from 5.8% to 18.3% under four definitions (Bianchi 2026, PMID 41852334; Fadini 2025, PMID 41142657). The unresolved task is consensus validation against off-treatment durability, complications and treatment burden.

OQ-3 — Is routine GLP-1RA plus SGLT2 therapy superior to either alone on hard outcomes?

Indirect evidence suggests complementary strengths—SGLT2 for HF, GLP-1RA for stroke and both for kidney/mortality. GLP-1RA effects appear consistent with baseline SGLT2 use, but only 1,743/17,072 participants in the relevant meta-analysis used SGLT2 at baseline; this tests interaction, not randomised incremental combination benefit (Palmer 2021, PMID 33441402; Neuen 2024, PMID 39210781). A 2026 target-trial emulation associated triple RAASi+SGLT2i+GLP-1RA therapy with lower mortality and kidney-event risk, but residual confounding remains (Casper 2026, PMID 42658186). A pragmatic factorial outcome trial in dual cardiorenal risk is feasible.

OQ-4 — Does early organ-protective therapy create a legacy effect?

UKPDS demonstrates benefits persisting 24 years after early glycaemic assignment, but whether finite early SGLT2/GLP-1 exposure changes long-term trajectories is unknown (Adler 2024, PMID 38772405). Withdrawal or delayed-start extensions with ethical rescue rules could test persistence.

OQ-5 — Which modern strategy is best over ten years: surgery, incretin therapy or structured diet?

Each approach achieves substantial glycaemic/weight benefit in unlike trials; surgery has longer follow-up, incretins have large CVOTs, and DiRECT has primary-care remission evidence (Courcoulas 2024, PMID 38411644; Aronne 2025, PMID 40353578; Lean 2024, PMID 38423026). A live 2026 search found a systematic review of six retrospective surgery-versus-GLP-1RA cohorts but no decade-long randomised hard-outcome comparison (Campbell 2026, PMID 42660781). A preference-aware pragmatic comparative-effectiveness trial should measure hard outcomes, treatment burden and total cost.

OQ-6 — Can youth-onset T2D complication trajectories be altered?

By mean age 26.4 years, 60.1% of TODAY follow-up participants had at least one microvascular complication. RISE showed neither glargine→metformin nor metformin alone halted β-cell decline, while DINAMO established 26-week empagliflozin HbA1c efficacy but not organ protection (TODAY 2021, PMID 34320286; RISE 2018, PMID 29941500; Laffel 2023, PMID 36738751). A live search through 2026-08-30 found efficacy and cohort evidence but no paediatric organ-outcome strategy trial; long trials need β-cell, kidney, retina and cardiovascular endpoints rather than adult extrapolation.

OQ-7 — How can SGLT2 sick-day rules reduce DKA without avoidable permanent discontinuation?

Euglycaemic DKA is rare but diagnostically hazardous, particularly with surgery, fasting and acute illness (Dutta 2022, PMID 35495849). A live search through 2026-08-30 found perioperative guidance and outcome syntheses but no randomised sick-day implementation pathway; cluster-randomised studies could compare written rules, EHR prompts, ketone access and restart pathways.

OQ-8 — Does anti-stigma care improve clinical outcomes?

Consensus evidence links stigma to distress and care barriers (Speight 2024, PMID 38128969). A 21-clinician randomised pilot improved attitudes toward stigma-free language but did not measure sustained clinician behaviour or any patient outcome (Joiner 2026, PMID 42579884). A larger clinic-level language/training intervention with validated stigma, attendance, medication-persistence and clinical outcomes is now the relevant next test.

OQ-9 — Which biomarker adds enough value to guide treatment?

Clusters and multi-omics predict heterogeneity, but simple clinical variables often match cluster-based treatment-response prediction (Dennis 2019, PMID 31047901; Carrasco-Zanini 2024, PMID 37889320). A live search through 2026-08-30 retrieved biomarker validation/prediction studies but no randomised test-use strategy with patient outcomes; future trials must randomise use of the test, not merely validate association.

OQ-10 — How should rapid HbA1c improvement be managed in advanced retinopathy?

SUSTAIN-6 detected retinopathy complications during rapid improvement, while ACCORD Eye and its follow-on show lower long-term retinopathy progression after intensive glycaemia (Marso 2016, PMID 27633186; Chew 2010, PMID 20587587; ACCORDION Eye 2016, PMID 27289122). A live search through 2026-08-30 found reviews and observational/legacy evidence but no randomised monitoring-or-titration strategy for early worsening; such trials could test whether monitoring or slower reduction preserves long-term benefit.

Tier 2 — important but requiring method or infrastructure development

OQ-11 — Is there a stable mechanistic taxonomy of T2D?

Data-driven clusters reproduce phenotypic variation but depend on continuous variables, timing and treatment; genetic pathways demonstrate heterogeneity without a validated clinical taxonomy (Ahlqvist 2018, PMID 29503172; Suzuki 2024, PMID 38374256). A live search through 2026-08-30 found cluster validation and response-prediction studies, but no randomised cluster-guided outcome strategy.

OQ-12 — What is the operational biomarker of the personal fat threshold?

The twin-cycle model explains remission through ectopic-fat reduction, yet no scalable liver/pancreas-fat or adipose-capacity threshold guides care across ancestries (Taylor 2024, PMID 39038473).

OQ-13 — How should global incidence be measured consistently?

IDF and GBD reconcile unlike tests, age ranges and source quality; low-resource settings have the largest diagnostic gaps (Sun 2022, PMID 34879977; GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators 2023, PMID 37356446). A standard repeated biochemical-surveillance platform is needed.

OQ-14 — Which prevention policies work without widening inequity?

High BMI and diet account for large modelled burden fractions, but comparative-risk models do not identify locally effective, equitable policies (GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators 2023, PMID 37356446; O'Hearn 2023, PMID 37069363).

OQ-15 — How much benefit is lost through discontinuation, shortage and cost?

Efficacy trials provide free drug and structured follow-up; global disease scale and expenditure make persistence/access central (Sun 2022, PMID 34879977; González-González 2021, PMID 34244276). Linked pharmacy, clinical and patient-reported datasets are needed.

OQ-16 — What is the correct complication-surveillance schedule after remission?

Consensus recommends continued observation because prior glycaemic exposure persists (Riddle 2021, PMID 34462270; Adler 2024, PMID 38772405). A live search through 2026-08-30 found consensus recommendations and observational risk studies, but no trial comparing surveillance intervals or deintensification after remission.

T2D is a high-risk context, but liver enzymes are insensitive and simple fibrosis scores have age-related false positives. Sequential test strategies require prospective clinical-outcome validation (Driessen 2025, PMID 38147315).

OQ-18 — How should patient-defined benefit enter treatment algorithms?

Preferences vary across route, adverse effects, weight, hypoglycaemia and cost, yet algorithms usually optimise disease outcomes first (González-González 2021, PMID 34244276; Davies 2022, PMID 36148880).

OQ-19 — Which intervention repairs the global diagnosis-to-control cascade?

In 2023, an estimated 55.8% of people with diabetes were diagnosed, 91.4% of those diagnosed were treated, but only 41.6% of treated people had optimal glycaemia; in 55 LMIC surveys, only 4.6% received all recommended treatments (Stafford 2025, PMID 40934935; Flood 2021, PMID 35211689). Cluster-randomised health-system trials should compare screening linkage, medicine supply, team care and risk-factor bundles using population-level control—not clinic attendees alone—as denominator.

OQ-20 — Is youth β-cell decline modifiable or only suppressible while treatment continues?

RISE found progressive β-cell deterioration on glargine→metformin or metformin, followed by worsening after withdrawal; liraglutide and empagliflozin improve HbA1c over 26–52 weeks (RISE 2018, PMID 29941500; Hannon 2020, PMID 32985775; Tamborlane 2019, PMID 31034184). A live search through 2026-08-30 found no youth T2D treatment-withdrawal study demonstrating durable secretion preservation; a withdrawal-aware trial should pair clamp/C-peptide measures with clinical durability.

OQ-21 — Is remission causal, or a marker of favourable biology and weight response?

Look AHEAD remission was associated with CKD HR 0.67 and CVD HR 0.60, and SOS remission with mortality HR 0.71, but remission is a post-randomisation state correlated with weight loss, fitness and β-cell reserve (Gregg 2024, PMID 38233592; Carlsson 2024, PMID 38896851). Mediation analyses and randomised maintenance interventions are needed before surveillance or risk treatment is de-escalated.

OQ-22 — What is the net benefit of different default HbA1c targets in the low-hypoglycaemia era?

ACP proposed 7%–8% for most adults while ADA/AACE often support lower individual targets; older intensive-control trials used therapies with different weight and hypoglycaemia profiles from current incretin/SGLT2 strategies (Qaseem 2018, PMID 29507945; Blonde 2022, PMID 35963508). A live search through 2026-08-30 found modern drug-comparison studies but no randomised default-target strategy built around incretin/SGLT2 therapy; such a trial should stratify by age, frailty and drug class.

OQ-23 — Can MASLD screening in T2D improve outcomes rather than referrals?

Meta-analysis estimates MASLD in 65.33% of people with T2D and advanced fibrosis in 15.49% of biopsy cohorts, but verification bias inflates histologic estimates (Younossi 2024, PMID 38521116). A live search through 2026-08-30 found biomarker and guideline studies but no randomised screening-to-clinical-outcome strategy; sequential FIB-4→elastography should be tested against usual care for cirrhosis, liver events, treatment burden and cost.

OQ-24 — Does CGM improve complications or mainly short-term glycaemia in non-prandial-insulin T2D?

MOBILE improved HbA1c by 0.4 points and time-in-range by 15 points over eight months in basal-insulin users; smaller non-insulin studies confound sensor feedback with education (Martens 2021, PMID 34077499; Martens 2025, PMID 39757879). A live search through 2026-08-30 found CGM measurement, association and short-term randomised studies but no complication-endpoint strategy trial in this population; longer pragmatic trials should measure severe hypoglycaemia, complications, distress, equity and total cost.

OQ-25 — How should active-comparator outcome trials alter sequencing?

SURPASS-CVOT established tirzepatide noninferiority but not superiority to dulaglutide (MACE HR 0.92, 95.3% CI 0.83–1.01), answering a different question from placebo-controlled SOUL (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.96) (Nicholls 2025, PMID 41406444; McGuire 2025, PMID 40162642). Decision models need absolute outcomes, weight, adverse effects, discontinuation and cost under contemporary background therapy.

OQ-26 — Which patient-reported outcomes are actionable in routine care?

Diabetes distress and self-management are the most consistently endorsed diabetes-specific outcomes, but screening without a response pathway can add burden (Hamilton 2023, PMID 37672919). Trials should randomise measurement-plus-response, not questionnaire administration alone, and include distress, safety, HbA1c, attendance and clinician workload.

Dots not yet connected

# Dot A Dot B The missing junction Powers
D-1 DiRECT weight-loss/remission dose response GLP-1/tirzepatide withdrawal and chronic dosing Randomised pharmacologic maintenance after diet-induced remission OQ-1, OQ-2
D-2 UKPDS 24-year legacy Rapid SGLT2/GLP-1 organ benefit Delayed-start/withdrawal evidence for an organ-protection legacy OQ-4
D-3 FLOW GLP-1 kidney benefit SGLT2 CKD foundation Direct incremental combination kidney-outcome trial OQ-3
D-4 TODAY rapid β-cell failure Adult incretin/SGLT2 outcome benefits Long youth trial with β-cell and organ endpoints OQ-6
D-5 Retinopathy early-worsening signal Large modern HbA1c reductions Eye-risk-guided titration strategy OQ-10
D-6 Genetic pathway heterogeneity GRADE comparative treatment response Genotype-guided randomised drug selection OQ-9, OQ-11
D-7 Ectopic-fat/twin-cycle biology Multi-ancestry body-composition differences Scalable personal-fat-threshold measurement OQ-12
D-8 Stigma consensus Clinical outcomes and adherence Cluster intervention testing language as a care technology OQ-8
D-9 Trial efficacy Patient preference/treatment burden Preference-concordant prescribing effect on persistence and outcomes OQ-15, OQ-18
D-10 Surgery decade-long glycaemic evidence Incretin CVOT and obesity efficacy Direct long-horizon comparative effectiveness OQ-5
D-11 GBD attributable dietary risk Local food insecurity and programme reach Equity-sensitive policy trial with incidence endpoint OQ-14
D-12 Remission definition UKPDS legacy complications Evidence-based surveillance interval after remission OQ-16
D-13 T2D–MASLD cardiovascular overlap Noninvasive fibrosis triage Screening strategy linked to liver and CV outcomes OQ-17
D-14 SGLT2 euglycaemic DKA cases EHR medication/surgery workflows Automated hold–ketone–restart pathway trial OQ-7
D-15 Global care-cascade modelling LMIC comprehensive-treatment coverage Population-denominator trial of diagnosis-to-control packages OQ-19
D-16 RISE β-cell decline Paediatric liraglutide/empagliflozin efficacy Durable disease-modification trial with withdrawal phase OQ-6, OQ-20
D-17 Remission-associated lower CKD/CVD Post-randomisation responder biology Causal mediation plus maintenance randomisation OQ-1, OQ-21
D-18 ACP versus ADA/AACE targets Modern low-hypoglycaemia drugs Target-strategy trial disentangling target from treatment OQ-22
D-19 High T2D–MASLD prevalence Sequential noninvasive fibrosis tests Screening-to-outcome strategy trial OQ-17, OQ-23
D-20 CGM short-term time-in-range benefit Legacy microvascular evidence Long-term CGM strategy trial with hard and patient-reported outcomes OQ-24
D-21 Active-comparator SURPASS-CVOT Placebo-controlled SOUL/FLOW Contemporary sequencing model and pragmatic trial OQ-3, OQ-25
D-22 Patient-reported outcome consensus Distress-intervention heterogeneity Measurement-plus-response trial OQ-8, OQ-18, OQ-26