Skip to content

Open questions — neuropathic pain

Last curated: 2026-08-30. Stable IDs persist when questions are sharpened; closed questions move to a closing section.

Priority rule

Tier 1 questions could change practice and are designable now. Tier 2 questions are important but depend on methods, cohorts or a Tier-1 result.

Dots not yet connected

# Dot A Dot B The missing junction Powers
D1 QST sensory clusters (PMID 16697110) Similar average efficacy across OPTION-DM pathways (PMID 36007534) No prospectively powered phenotype × drug interaction trial OQ-1
D2 Reversible QST phenotype after decompression (PMID 33769367) Central plasticity framework (PMID 19712899) No study quantifies when peripheral-source removal ceases to reverse central amplification OQ-2
D3 NaV channel causal genetics/mechanisms (PMID 15362153) Weak broad translation of sodium modulators (PMID 33899639) No enrichment design joins genotype/excitability to selective therapy OQ-3
D4 Persistent CIPN at ≥6 months, 30% (PMID 25261162) Candidate neurofilament marker (PMID 39242335) No validated baseline marker predicts painful persistence and safe cumulative dose OQ-4
D5 SCS randomized efficacy in painful diabetes (PMID 33818600) Very-low-certainty long-term implanted evidence (PMID 34854473) No complete five-year comparison counts infection, revision, explant, medication and cost OQ-5
D6 Patient priorities include sleep/function/work (PMID 25354872) Trials emphasize mean pain intensity (PMID 23042476) Treatment rankings have not been recalculated under patient-weighted outcomes OQ-6
D7 PHN is vaccine-preventable (PMID 15930418) Wide global PHN risk definitions (PMID 24916088) No harmonized contemporary preventable-burden estimate OQ-7
D8 DRG immune cells initiate/persist pain (PMID 31937758) Immune programs also resolve pain (PMID 36859719) Human phase-specific cell-state marker and timed intervention are absent OQ-8
D9 Updated SCI neuropathic-pain prevalence is 57% but varies by classification system (PMID 41043376) CanPainSCI added screening and diagnosis recommendations using GRADE (PMID 35124700) No representative implementation study tests whether standardized classification changes recognition, treatment or function OQ-19
D10 Significant CIPN symptoms were associated with fall/near-fall hazard ratio 2.67 (PMID 27183099) Exercise consensus recommends etiology-specific rehabilitation despite heterogeneous evidence (PMID 34901069) No adequately powered fall-prevention trial enrolls on emerging sensory symptoms and measures injuries rather than pain alone OQ-20
D11 Forty-one percent of central post-stroke pain begins 1–12 months after stroke (PMID 32451951) Rehabilitation pathways concentrate assessment earlier No randomized or implementation comparison tests scheduled sensory surveillance through 12 months OQ-21
D12 Chinese exercise consensus recommends exercise for neuropathic pain (PMID 34901069) PEER judges neuropathic-pain exercise benefit unclear (PMID 35292455) Etiology-specific responder, function and harm data have not been synthesized under one certainty framework OQ-22

Tier 1

OQ-1. Can sensory phenotype select treatment?

Retrospective associations exist, but clinical utility requires prespecified stratification, a treatment-interaction test and external replication (PMID 24670811; PMID 36198371).

OQ-2. When is neuropathic pain still dependent on peripheral input?

Central sensitization can outlast input, while decompression changes phenotype; no validated perturbation test quantifies dependence (PMID 19712899; PMID 33769367).

OQ-3. Can sodium-channel treatment be rescued by enrichment?

Channel biology is strong, but subtype selectivity, target engagement and trial phenotype remain barriers (PMID 15362153; PMID 33899639).

OQ-4. Can persistent CIPN be predicted before irreversible exposure?

CIPN remains in about 30% at ≥6 months, but proposed axonal markers lack predictive clinical validation (PMID 25261162; PMID 39242335).

OQ-5. What is the long-term net benefit of implanted stimulation?

Short-term selected-population efficacy must be balanced against infection, revision, explant and cost over years (PMID 33818600; PMID 34854473).

OQ-6. Do patient-weighted endpoints reorder treatment choices?

Qualitative priorities extend beyond pain, while most trials optimize pain intensity (PMID 25354872; PMID 23042476).

OQ-7. How much PHN is preventable now?

Vaccination works, but age, product, immune status and PHN definitions impede a current global estimate (PMID 15930418; PMID 36098300).

OQ-8. Can neuroimmune therapy be timed to harmful rather than resolving states?

Macrophage/glial pathways can initiate, maintain and resolve pain, demanding state-specific human markers (PMID 31937758; PMID 36859719).

OQ-19. Does standardized SCI classification improve outcomes, not just prevalence precision?

The updated meta-analysis pooled prevalence at 57% (95% CI 51–64; I²=96.2%) and found that classification system significantly altered the estimate, while the updated CanPainSCI process added three screening/diagnosis recommendations (PMID 41043376; PMID 35124700). A cluster-randomized implementation trial could compare structured classification plus treatment linkage against usual rehabilitation assessment; the primary endpoint should be participation or sleep at 6–12 months, with recognition rate, false-positive referrals and medication/device exposure as co-endpoints.

OQ-20. Can symptom-triggered balance intervention prevent CIPN falls?

In a prospective cohort of 116 people beginning taxane or platinum chemotherapy, significant numbness/tingling was associated with a 2.67-fold fall-or-near-fall hazard (95% CI 1.62–4.41), but the hypothesis was generated after data collection and 94% of participants were female (PMID 27183099). A pragmatic trial should trigger gait/balance assessment and strength training at a prespecified symptom threshold, stratify by agent and baseline fall risk, and use injurious falls per person-time—not neuropathy score alone—as the primary outcome.

OQ-21. Should stroke pathways screen for central pain through 12 months?

Central post-stroke pain pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 7–18); among affected patients, 41% developed it between one month and one year and 5% after one year (PMID 32451951). A stepped-wedge comparison of scheduled somatosensory/pain assessment at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months versus symptom-initiated review could test time to correct diagnosis, inappropriate analgesic exposure, pain interference and participation while measuring the burden of false-positive screens.

OQ-22. Is exercise efficacy etiology-specific or obscured by pooled “neuropathic pain”?

One expert consensus used 8 systematic reviews and 21 RCTs to recommend exercise across ten etiologies, whereas the PEER guideline judged evidence of exercise benefit unclear for neuropathic pain (PMID 34901069; PMID 35292455). Resolution requires a prospectively registered individual-participant-data synthesis separating diabetic, chemotherapy, radicular, SCI, stroke, MS, HIV and postsurgical populations, with pain responders, physical function, falls and adherence analyzed jointly.

Tier 2

  • OQ-9. What representative prevalence meets probable/definite 2016 grading rather than questionnaire positivity? (PMID 24291734; PMID 27115670)
  • OQ-10. Which combination sequence retains benefit beyond 16 weeks? (PMID 36007534; PMID 23732189)
  • OQ-11. Can a multimodal biomarker outperform examination and lesion confirmation externally? (PMID 35659993; PMID 20642627)
  • OQ-12. Which acute intervention adds PHN prevention beyond vaccination? (PMID 38050854)
  • OQ-13. Can procedure-specific nerve mapping prevent chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain? (PMID 23273105)
  • OQ-14. What rTMS protocol and maintenance schedule gives durable benefit? (PMID 34196698; PMID 34826512)
  • OQ-15. How should mixed central, peripheral and nociplastic mechanisms be represented in trials? (PMID 28666966; PMID 32584191)
  • OQ-16. Can guideline panels reconcile different placements of pregabalin and topical therapy? (PMID 25575710; PMID 32276788)
  • OQ-17. Which rehabilitation program reduces falls and restores work in CIPN? (PMID 35149899)
  • OQ-18. Can renal-dose and fall-risk controls reduce gabapentinoid harm without undertreating pain? (PMID 30673120)

Minimum decisive designs

These are design specifications, not claims that a single protocol is mandatory. They state what evidence would materially narrow each question and what result would count against the working premise.

ID Population and allocation Primary decision endpoint Minimum follow-up Result that would narrow or close the question
OQ-1 Probable/definite peripheral neuropathic pain; phenotype-stratified randomization across mechanistically distinct drug classes Prespecified phenotype × treatment interaction on ≥30% pain response plus function 16 weeks Replicated interaction with calibration in an external cohort, or precise exclusion of a clinically useful interaction
OQ-2 Persistent pain after a treatable peripheral lesion; randomized diagnostic perturbation or source-directed treatment Sustained change in pain interference and evoked-pain area 6 months A validated perturbation threshold predicting durable response, or evidence that the test adds no value over lesion/examination data
OQ-3 Genotype- or excitability-enriched peripheral pain; selective sodium-channel modulator versus placebo/active class ≥30% response with target-engagement confirmation 16 weeks Reproduced enrichment interaction, or adequate target engagement with no clinical separation
OQ-4 Patients starting neurotoxic chemotherapy; prospective biomarker model with external validation Painful CIPN at ≥6 months and dose-limiting toxicity 12 months Calibration/discrimination sufficient to alter exposure decisions without excess cancer-treatment undertreatment
OQ-5 Device-eligible painful neuropathy; implanted stimulation versus optimized non-device care Patient-weighted net benefit including pain, function, serious harm, revision and explant 5 years Durable positive net benefit under realistic attrition/crossover, or confidence interval excluding the prespecified benefit threshold
OQ-6 Broad neuropathic-pain trial archive with patient-derived outcome weights Rank stability across pain-only versus patient-weighted benefit-harm utility Trial duration plus sensitivity analyses Stable rankings across weights, or reproducible clinically important reordering
OQ-7 Age-, immune-status- and vaccine-stratified population cohorts Prevented PHN cases per 100,000 person-years using a harmonized ≥90-day definition 3 years Transportable preventable-burden estimates with measured coverage and breakthrough disease
OQ-8 Serial human blood/CSF/skin sampling across acute-to-persistent neuropathic pain Reproducible phase-specific immune state linked to prognosis and intervention response 12 months External replication and treatment interaction, or failure of candidate states to predict beyond clinical variables
OQ-9 Representative population sample assessed with 2016 grading Probable/definite prevalence with non-response weighting Cross-sectional plus confirmation Narrow, transportable prevalence intervals and quantified questionnaire misclassification
OQ-10 Partial responders after standardized monotherapy; randomized sequence/combination pathways ≥50% response, function and withdrawal for harm 12 months One pathway’s sustained net benefit or precise equivalence within a prespecified margin
OQ-11 Multi-etiology diagnostic cohort; locked multimodal model versus expert clinical assessment External discrimination, calibration and net benefit 12 months Clinically useful incremental net benefit, or no gain after optimism correction
OQ-12 Acute zoster despite contemporary vaccination; intervention versus placebo PHN at ≥90 days with acute harms 6 months Reproducible relative and absolute risk reduction beyond vaccine protection
OQ-13 Procedure-specific surgical cohorts; mapped nerve-preservation strategy randomized by center Probable/definite neuropathic pain at 12 months 12 months Reduced neuropathic pain without worse oncologic/surgical outcomes
OQ-14 Central or peripheral phenotype-specific rTMS; factorial target/frequency/maintenance design Pain interference and ≥30% response after treatment cessation 6 months Protocol-specific durable benefit or exclusion of the minimum important effect under credible sham
OQ-15 Mixed-mechanism cohorts with lesion-confirmed and nociplastic features measured independently Model fit, treatment interaction and patient-level calibration 12 months A representation that improves prognosis/treatment selection over mutually exclusive labels
OQ-16 Independent guideline panels using one evidence-to-decision framework Concordance after harmonized certainty, costs and preferences One update cycle Residual differences explicitly attributable to values/resources rather than evidence selection
OQ-17 Persistent CIPN with fall/work limitation; rehabilitation versus attention control Injurious falls, work participation and physical function 12 months Clinically important functional gain with acceptable adherence and no injury excess
OQ-18 New gabapentinoid users with renal impairment or fall risk; electronic control plus pharmacist review Serious falls/respiratory events and ≥30% pain response 12 months Harm reduction without loss of responder probability beyond a non-inferiority margin
OQ-19 SCI rehabilitation services randomized to structured classification/treatment linkage or usual assessment Participation or sleep plus diagnostic yield and false-positive burden 12 months Better patient-centered outcome with acceptable workload, or no incremental benefit despite improved labeling
OQ-20 Taxane/platinum recipients crossing a prespecified sensory threshold Injurious falls per person-time Through treatment plus 6 months Reduced falls with preserved cancer-treatment delivery, or precise evidence of no preventive effect
OQ-21 Stroke follow-up pathways using scheduled versus symptom-triggered central-pain screening Time to correct diagnosis and pain interference 12–18 months Earlier diagnosis with better function and acceptable false-positive burden
OQ-22 Individual-participant data across etiology-specific exercise trials Pain responder, function, fall and adherence interaction by etiology ≥6 months Reproducible etiology-specific benefit, or precise absence of clinically useful exercise effects

Closed

None in this build.