Skip to content

Statistics quick reference — spinal stenosis

Last curated: 2026-08-30

Use rule. Every row preserves population, horizon and method. Estimates that answer different case definitions or use different comparators are displayed side by side and are never averaged. All PMIDs were retrieved live from PubMed E-utilities on 2026-08-30.

Prevalence by definition and setting

Figure Population / year Method Source
11% (95% CI 4–18%) General adult populations; studies through review search Pooled clinically diagnosed LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
25% (19–32%) Primary-care samples Pooled clinically diagnosed LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
29% (22–36%) Secondary-care samples Pooled clinically diagnosed LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
39% (39–39%) Mixed primary/secondary-care sample stratum Pooled clinically diagnosed LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
11% (5–18%) Asymptomatic samples Pooled radiological LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
38% (−10% to 85%) General-population samples Pooled radiological LSS; very sparse/heterogeneous Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
15% (13–18%) Primary-care samples Pooled radiological LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
32% (22–41%) Secondary-care samples Pooled radiological LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
21% (16–26%) Mixed-care samples Pooled radiological LSS Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
41 papers / 55 samples Adult LSS prevalence literature Systematic-review evidence base Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908
Two-thirds high risk of bias Same evidence base Review risk-of-bias assessment Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908

Imaging definitions and discordance

Figure Population / year Method Source
<10 mm Published lumbar imaging literature Common anteroposterior-diameter threshold for central stenosis Steurer 2011, PMID 21798008
<70 mm² Published lumbar imaging literature Common canal cross-sectional-area threshold Steurer 2011, PMID 21798008
10 quantitative parameters 25 imaging studies Systematic review of radiological criteria Steurer 2011, PMID 21798008
4 of 63 treatment studies Primary studies in treatment reviews Reported quantitative imaging entry criteria Steurer 2011, PMID 21798008
437 patients NORDSTEN surgical candidates Baseline cross-sectional MRI cohort Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405
71.3% Same cohort Severe Schizas C/D morphology Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405
86.8% Same cohort Dural-sac area <75 mm² Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405
58.1% Same cohort Pfirrmann grade 4/5 disc degeneration Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405
11.9% Same cohort Facet tropism ≥15° Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405
83.7% Same cohort Multifidus fatty-degeneration grades 2–4 Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405
No clinically relevant association Same cohort Multivariable relation of MRI severity to ODI, ZCQ and pain Aaen 2022, PMID 34797405

Lumbar natural history

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
146 enrolled; 89% followed Moderate, nonsurgical central LSS; 3.3 years Consecutive observational cohort Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
Mean age 68; 58% women Same cohort Baseline description Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
32% improved / 55% unchanged / 13% worsened Same cohort Leg-pain MCID categories Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
36% improved / 54% unchanged / 10% worsened Same cohort Back-pain MCID categories Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
7% crossed to surgery Same cohort Revision of initial nonsurgical decision Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
No group walking improvement Same cohort Longitudinal walking outcome Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
No spontaneous improvement below 0.5 cm² Same cohort Subgroup by minimum canal area Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234
202 patients; 121±40 months Symptomatic LSS with ≥5-year follow-up Retrospective cohort Ng 2025, PMID 40939213
19.3% deteriorated Same cohort Weakness, sphincter change or walking ≤10 min composite Ng 2025, PMID 40939213
92.3% of deteriorators Deteriorating subgroup Reduced walking tolerance Ng 2025, PMID 40939213
20.5% of deteriorators Deteriorating subgroup Myotomal weakness Ng 2025, PMID 40939213
5.1% of deteriorators Deteriorating subgroup Sphincter disturbance Ng 2025, PMID 40939213
Adjusted hazard ratio 10.11 Same cohort Developmental stenosis predicting deterioration Ng 2025, PMID 40939213
AUC 0.781 at <55 mm² Same cohort Dural-sac area predicting 5-year deterioration Ng 2025, PMID 40939213

DCM natural history and severity

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
6 studies Conservatively managed DCM Meta-analysis of prospective cohorts/RCTs Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
91% stable (95% CrI 83–97%) Mild DCM; 1 year Modeled neurological-stability survival Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
85% (72–94%) Mild DCM; 2 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
84% (70–94%) Mild DCM; 3 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
75% (54–90%) Mild DCM; 5 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
66% (40–86%) Mild DCM; 15 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
65% (39–86%) Mild DCM; 20 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
83% stable (76–89%) Moderate/severe DCM; 1 year Modeled neurological-stability survival Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
72% (62–81%) Moderate/severe DCM; 2 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
71% (60–80%) Moderate/severe DCM; 3 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
55% (41–68%) Moderate/severe DCM; 5 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
44% (27–59%) Moderate/severe DCM; 15 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
43% (25–58%) Moderate/severe DCM; 20 years Same Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831
757 patients / 26 sites Prospective AO Spine cohorts mJOA severity-threshold derivation Tetreault 2017, PMID 27342612
mJOA 15–17 Clinically diagnosed DCM Mild category anchored to Nurick Tetreault 2017, PMID 27342612
mJOA 12–14 Same Moderate category Tetreault 2017, PMID 27342612
mJOA 0–11 Same Severe category Tetreault 2017, PMID 27342612

Rehabilitation trials

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
259 participants LSS, age >60; 6-week interventions Three-arm randomized trial Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
Mean age 72.4±7.8; 52.9% women Same trial Baseline characteristics Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
−2.0 SSS points (95% CI −3.6 to −0.4) Manual/individualized vs medical care; 2 months Adjusted between-group difference Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
−2.4 (−4.1 to −0.8) Manual/individualized vs group exercise; 2 months Adjusted between-group difference Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
20% vs 7.6% vs 3.0% Manual/individualized vs medical vs group exercise ≥30% symptom/function responders Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
65.3% vs 48.7% vs 46.2% Same arms Walking-capacity responders at 2 months Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
No between-group difference Same arms; 6 months Mean outcomes and responder rates Schneider 2019, PMID 30646197
43 vs 43 participants MRI-confirmed LSS Supervised PT vs home-exercise RCT Minetama 2019, PMID 30986577
+30.2 percentage points (95% CI 9.1–48.6) 6 weeks ZCQ symptom-severity responder difference Minetama 2019, PMID 30986577
+32.6 percentage points (11.6–50.6) 6 weeks ZCQ physical-function responder difference Minetama 2019, PMID 30986577
+39.5 percentage points (18.8–56.7) 6 weeks Walking-distance responder difference Minetama 2019, PMID 30986577
+34.9 percentage points (13.9–52.7) 6 weeks Leg-pain responder difference Minetama 2019, PMID 30986577
+25.6 percentage points (4.9–43.9) 6 weeks Daily-step responder difference Minetama 2019, PMID 30986577
13 trials / 1,440 participants Neurogenic-claudication exercise RCTs Systematic review/component analysis Comer 2024, PMID 37715644
23 interventions / 60 components Same review Component inventory Comer 2024, PMID 37715644

Epidural injection

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
400 randomized Central LSS with moderate/severe leg pain and disability Double-blind glucocorticoid+lidocaine vs lidocaine Friedly 2014, PMID 24988555
−1.0 RMDQ points (95% CI −2.1 to 0.1; P=0.07) 6 weeks Adjusted incremental steroid effect Friedly 2014, PMID 24988555
−0.2/10 leg pain (−0.8 to 0.4; P=0.48) 6 weeks Adjusted incremental steroid effect Friedly 2014, PMID 24988555
No significant route interaction Interlaminar vs transforaminal subgroup Prespecified analysis Friedly 2014, PMID 24988555

Decompression versus nonoperative care

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
289 randomized + 365 observational Surgical candidates, ≥12 weeks symptoms SPORT parallel cohorts Weinstein 2010, PMID 20453723
+12.6 bodily-pain points (95% CI 8.5–16.7) 4 years Adjusted as-treated surgical effect Weinstein 2010, PMID 20453723
+8.6 physical-function points (4.6–12.6) 4 years Adjusted as-treated surgical effect Weinstein 2010, PMID 20453723
−9.4 ODI points (−12.6 to −6.2) 4 years Adjusted as-treated surgical effect Weinstein 2010, PMID 20453723
70% vs 52% underwent surgery Randomized-to-surgery vs randomized-nonoperative; 8 years Treatment crossover Lurie 2015, PMID 25569524
55% vs 52% retained Randomized vs observational cohorts; 8 years Follow-up completeness Lurie 2015, PMID 25569524
No significant years 6–8 effect Randomized cohort, as-treated Late treatment-effect convergence Lurie 2015, PMID 25569524

Decompression versus fusion

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
247 randomized One/two-level LSS; 135 with spondylolisthesis Swedish trial Försth 2016, PMID 27074066
ODI 27 vs 24 (P=0.24) Fusion vs decompression; 2 years Primary outcome Försth 2016, PMID 27074066
397 vs 405 m (P=0.72) Fusion vs decompression; 6-minute walk Objective function Försth 2016, PMID 27074066
7.4 vs 4.1 days (P<0.001) Fusion vs decompression Hospital stay Försth 2016, PMID 27074066
22% vs 21% Fusion vs decompression; mean 6.5 years Additional lumbar surgery Försth 2016, PMID 27074066
ODI change −20.6 vs −21.3 Decompression vs fusion; 2 years NORDSTEN-DS mean change Austevoll 2021, PMID 34347953
Difference 0.7 (95% CI −2.8 to 4.3) Same Between-group ODI change Austevoll 2021, PMID 34347953
71.4% vs 72.9% Same ≥30% ODI responder, modified ITT Austevoll 2021, PMID 34347953
Difference −1.4 points (−12.2 to 9.4) Same Responder contrast; noninferiority margin −15 Austevoll 2021, PMID 34347953
12.5% vs 9.1% Decompression vs fusion; 2 years Reoperation Austevoll 2021, PMID 34347953
63% vs 63% Decompression vs fusion; 5 years ≥30% ODI response, imputed modified ITT Kgomotso 2024, PMID 39111800
Difference 0.4 points (−11.2 to 11.9) Same Five-year responder contrast Kgomotso 2024, PMID 39111800
ODI change −17.8 vs −17.8 Same Five-year mean change Kgomotso 2024, PMID 39111800
16% vs 18% Decompression vs fusion; baseline to 5 years Subsequent lumbar operation Kgomotso 2024, PMID 39111800
ODI 25 vs 28 (P=0.226) Decompression vs fusion; Swedish trial 5 years Primary outcome Karlsson 2024, PMID 38945544
EQ-5D 0.69 vs 0.59 (P=0.027) Same Health-related quality of life Karlsson 2024, PMID 38945544
22% vs 24% (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.69–1.8) Decompression vs fusion Subsequent spinal surgery Karlsson 2024, PMID 38945544

Interspinous spacer outcomes

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
391 implanted (190 vs 201) Moderate LSS after ≥6 months nonsurgical care Superion vs X-STOP randomized noninferiority trial Patel 2015, PMID 25494323
99.5% vs 99.0% Superion vs X-STOP Implantation success Patel 2015, PMID 25494323
70% leg-pain reduction Both groups; 2 years Within-group change Patel 2015, PMID 25494323
77% leg-pain success Both groups; 2 years ≥20-mm improvement Patel 2015, PMID 25494323
68% back-pain success Both groups; 2 years ≥20-mm improvement Patel 2015, PMID 25494323
65% ODI success Both groups; 2 years ≥15-point improvement Patel 2015, PMID 25494323
74 of 88 (84%) Superion recipients available at 5 years Success on ≥2 of 3 ZCQ domains Nunley 2017, PMID 28919727
75% / 81% / 90% Same ZCQ symptom/function/satisfaction success Nunley 2017, PMID 28919727
75% free from index-level repeat procedure Same; 5 years Reoperation/revision/fixation-free proportion Nunley 2017, PMID 28919727

Falls, patient-derived outcomes and perioperative vulnerability

Figure Population / horizon Method Source
64 of 135 fell Surgical DCM cohort; enrollment to 1 year Prospective multicenter study Inose 2021, PMID 33496544
65 of 132 (49%) fell DCM fall-diary respondents Prospective 8-center cohort Kimura 2020, PMID 31809466
497.4 → 90.3 falls/100 person-years Same cohort; pre- vs postoperative Diary-derived incidence Kimura 2020, PMID 31809466
34% → 8% motor deterioration per fall Same cohort Pre- vs postoperative event proportion Kimura 2020, PMID 31809466
8-person focus group + 224-person survey People living with DCM/supporters Mixed-methods outcome generation Davies 2022, PMID 33203262
52 initial + 16 added outcomes Same Patient-derived consequence list Davies 2022, PMID 33203262
All outcomes recognized by ≥5% Same survey Endorsement threshold Davies 2022, PMID 33203262
36 of 89 (40.5%) delirium Spine-surgery patients aged ≥70 Prospective validated assessment Brown 2016, PMID 27696373
17 of 36 (47.2%) hypoactive only Delirium cases Phenotype assessment Brown 2016, PMID 27696373
OR 3.66 (95% CI 1.48–9.04) Same cohort Delirium associated with higher length-of-stay quintile Brown 2016, PMID 27696373
OR 3.49 (1.35–9.00) Same cohort Delirium associated with higher charge quintile Brown 2016, PMID 27696373
OR 0.22 (0.07–0.69) Same cohort Delirium associated with discharge home Brown 2016, PMID 27696373

Known conflicts and caveats

  1. Clinical versus radiological prevalence: pooled values answer different case definitions; imaging-only estimates must not be used as symptomatic-disease prevalence (Jensen 2020, PMID 32095908).
  2. Short versus long lumbar natural history: the 3.3-year cohort selected tolerable moderate symptoms; the 10-year cohort used a deterioration composite and retrospective selection (Wessberg 2017, PMID 28417234; Ng 2025, PMID 40939213).
  3. SPORT causal contrast: four-year as-treated effects favored surgery, while eight-year randomized-cohort effects converged amid 70%/52% crossover and roughly half retention (Weinstein 2010, PMID 20453723; Lurie 2015, PMID 25569524).
  4. Fusion conflict: SLIP reported a more favorable signal for fusion, whereas the larger Swedish and NORDSTEN programs did not show better disability outcomes from routine fusion (Ghogawala 2016, PMID 27074067; Försth 2016, PMID 27074066; Kgomotso 2024, PMID 39111800).
  5. Spacer durability: five-year percentages are among 85–88 available participants from an original 391-person device trial, and the randomized comparator was another spacer rather than decompression (Patel 2015, PMID 25494323; Nunley 2017, PMID 28919727).
  6. DCM stability curves: credible intervals widen markedly at 15–20 years, reflecting few studies and attrition; they are not individual prognostic calculators (Sarraj 2024, PMID 37549831).
  7. Delirium transportability: the 40.5% estimate comes from a single academic cohort with active validated surveillance, not routine chart coding (Brown 2016, PMID 27696373).
  8. Falls before/after surgery: large pre/post reductions are observational and can reflect activity exposure and reporting changes as well as surgery (Kimura 2020, PMID 31809466).