Skip to content

Annotated patient-voice sources

Last curated: 2026-08-30

Published qualitative and mixed-method evidence

Source Population/method Contribution Limitation
Toye et al. 2013, PMID 23585633 Metasynthesis of chronic low-back-pain qualitative research Legitimacy, loss, coping and identity Original studies heterogeneous
Toye et al. 2015, PMID 25793491 Meta-ethnography Cross-study experience framework Chronic LBP, not DDD-specific
May et al. 2012, PMID 21896231 Qualitative general-practice study Experience of persistent nonspecific pain Local health-system context
Alhowimel et al. 2022, PMID 32746671 Qualitative radiological-diagnosis study Psychosocial effects of imaging labels Small selected sample
Sharma et al. 2020, PMID 32830105 Systematic qualitative evidence synthesis Clinician/patient imaging beliefs Beliefs do not directly measure outcomes
Slade et al. 2014, PMID 24300225 Systematic qualitative review Exercise beliefs and barriers Program and country heterogeneity
Darlow et al. 2022, PMID 35358311 Qualitative self-management study Adaptation, support and barriers Transferability limited
Babatunde et al. 2024, PMID 38635470 Systematic qualitative review Exercise adherence enablers/barriers Nonspecific chronic LBP
Garg et al. 2020, PMID 33310794 Systematic qualitative review Digital uptake and utilization Technology evolves rapidly
Ribeiro et al. 2024, PMID 38752763 Qualitative care-experience study Expectations of physician/physiotherapist care Local sample
Suri et al. 2024, PMID 39639259 Primary-care qualitative study Hopes, expectations and treatment experience Context-specific
van Gorp et al. 2024, PMID 38943770 Theory-informed qualitative implementation study Barriers to active guideline care Implementation rather than efficacy
Bahouq et al. 2022, PMID 32931339 Qualitative study Sexual disability perspective Sensitive-topic and sample limitations
Kaptan et al. 2025, PMID 40470001 Qualitative study Sexual health and chronic LBP Recent single study
Vlaeyen et al. 2024, PMID 38905971 Qualitative study with patient involvement Emotions, cognitions and behavior Does not validate treatment mechanism
Bagg et al. 2023, PMID 37696066 Qualitative paracetamol-reduction study Medicine beliefs and deprescribing Drug-specific and setting-specific
Opsahl et al. 2022, PMID 35152369 IPD meta-analysis Return-to-work expectations Quantitative prognostic evidence, not qualitative
Steenstra et al. 2024, PMID 38864993 Systematic prognostic review Return-to-work factors Heterogeneous work systems

Public organization and policy sources

Source Annotation
BackCare, https://backcare.org.uk/get-involved/, accessed 2026-08-30 UK back-pain charity; education, awareness and research links.
National Spine Health Foundation, https://spinehealth.org/about-us/, accessed 2026-08-30 US spine-specific nonprofit; broad treatment and patient-story resources.
U.S. Pain Foundation, https://uspainfoundation.org/, accessed 2026-08-30 US chronic-pain support and advocacy; not DDD-specific.
Painaustralia, https://www.painaustralia.org.au/about-us/a-bit-about-us, accessed 2026-08-30 Australian peak pain-policy body emphasizing lived experience and access.
Chronic Pain Australia, https://chronicpainaustralia.org.au/about/, accessed 2026-08-30 Australian consumer organization and peer-support role.
Pain Alliance Europe, https://pae-eu.eu/, accessed 2026-08-30 Umbrella patient organization; surveys and European policy.
Pain Canada, https://www.paincanada.ca/, accessed 2026-08-30 National action network created after the federal pain action plan.
Pain Ontario, https://www.painontario.ca/, accessed 2026-08-30 Regional nonprofit with explicit equity and navigation framework.
Chronic Pain Association of Canada, https://chronicpaincanada.com/about.html, accessed 2026-08-30 Independent nonprofit with explicit opioid-policy advocacy; interpret positionally.
Health Canada, https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/chronic-pain/chronic-pain-resources.html, accessed 2026-08-30 Government resource directory including Indigenous and veterans’ resources.
Australian Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standard, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/clinical-care-standards/low-back-pain, accessed 2026-08-30 Consumer and service implementation materials; not patient-led.

Coverage limits

The sources overrepresent English-language, high-income, healthcare-engaged populations. People without diagnostic imaging, insurance, digital access, stable employment or specialist referral are underrepresented. Public organization sites curate their mission and success stories; they do not provide representative prevalence estimates. No private social-media source was used. A live PubMed E-utilities sweep on 2026-08-30 identified a DDD-specific qualitative content-validity study of ODI (Powers 2026, PMID 41507883), but no representative DDD patient-priority survey using a stated probability or validated sampling frame. Future work should prioritize multilingual qualitative syntheses and patient-led organizations in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.