Skip to content

Not yet independently audited

This page was written from verified sources but has not yet passed the independent citation audit. Treat its claims as provisional.

Patient Experience and Advocacy in Thoracic Aortic Disease

TL;DR — Patients experience TAA/dissection as three distinct ordeals the clinical literature measures poorly: a diagnosis ordeal (≈1 in 3 acute dissections initially misdiagnosed, median 4.3 h ED-to-diagnosis; Lovatt 2022, PMID 34968970; Harris 2011, PMID 21969019), a surveillance ordeal ("ticking time bomb" living, activity restriction, scan-to-scan anxiety; McEntire 2021, PMID 34386933), and a survivorship ordeal (23% PTSD screen-positive years after type A repair, with only 7% documented; 32% new-onset depression and anxiety; Pasadyn 2020, PMID 32340520; Chaddha 2015, PMID 26769699). A dense worldwide ecosystem of patient organizations has grown in response — from the Marfan Foundation family of gene-centered groups to dissection-survivor charities running the THINK AORTA diagnostic-awareness campaign — and has crossed from support into research production (PCORI Aortic Dissection Collaborative, NIHR DECIDE-TAD, VASCERN ePAGs). The biggest structural gap: no validated TAA-specific patient-reported outcome measure exists, and TAA trials essentially never measure what patients say matters (Shan 2023, PMID 37451607; Velvin 2025, PMID 39789589).

The diagnosis experience

Acute dissection: the misdiagnosis ordeal. Pooled across 12 studies (n=1,663), 33.8% of acute aortic dissections are initially misdiagnosed; the mimics named in the review are acute coronary syndrome, stroke and pulmonary embolism, with absent typical features (such as a widened mediastinum on chest X-ray) and concurrent conditions such as congestive heart failure driving the error (Lovatt 2022, PMID 34968970). In IRAD, median time from ED arrival to diagnosis was 4.3 h (Q1–Q3 1.5–24 h), with delays concentrated in women, atypical/painless presentations, and non-tertiary first hospitals (Harris 2011, PMID 21969019). Even among emergency transfers to an aortic center with a presumed aortic diagnosis, 11.4% were misdiagnosed (Holmes 2021, PMID 34838743). Qualitative work shows the process is experienced as traumatic in itself — "unnecessary drama" at diagnosis is a named patient theme (Lee 2022, PMID 35501045) — and emergency-medicine reviews now list awareness campaigns among the fixes (Reed 2024, PMID 38708978).

Chronic aneurysm: the incidental-finding pathway. TAA is usually asymptomatic and found incidentally (overview, imaging-and-surveillance); the patient's experience is therefore often years of surveillance for a condition they cannot feel. The best-documented public narrative is Olympic sprinter Roger Black: bicuspid valve found at a school check at age 11, 47 years of annual monitoring through elite sport, then valve + aortic surgery at 58 when the aorta enlarged — he calls it "a ticking time bomb" (British Heart Foundation — Heart Matters, Roger Black story, https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/my-story/roger-black-open-heart-surgery, accessed 2026-08-27).

Psychological burden

Finding Population Number Source
PTSD screen-positive (PC-PTSD) Type A dissection survivors, median 6.8 y post-op 23% (30/129); 44% "constantly on guard… or easily startled"; only 7.4% of screen-positives had PTSD in the chart (Pasadyn 2020, PMID 32340520)
New-onset depression / anxiety (self-report) Type A+B survivors (IRAD center) 32% / 32% (Chaddha 2015, PMID 26769699)
Clinically concerning post-traumatic stress symptoms Adults with aortopathy + CHD or HCTD 5.8–7.3%; prior psychological disorder OR 9.71 (Dreher 2025, PMID 40948724)
Higher distress (PHQ-9+GAD-7) Non-syndromic TAA/dissection under activity restriction worse if diagnosed >2 y, age 35–65, coping poorly, exercise "very important" (McEntire 2021, PMID 34386933)
Poor sleep (PSQI>5) Dutch dissection survivors (SADN cohort) 55.7% (Bacour 2025, PMID 39941528)
Sexual dysfunction post-repair Type A survivors, China 38.9% overall (Luo 2021, PMID 33933114)

Distinct psychological phases are documented: the pre-operative waiting period in type B dissection is organized around constructing illness uncertainty, appraising the wait, coping, and trust in the team (Liu 2026, PMID 42277648); long-term survivorship features unaddressed mental-health needs as a stand-alone qualitative theme (Lee 2022, PMID 35501045). The Aortic Dissection Collaborative's mental-health landscape review concluded the field has mostly administered generic SF-36 snapshots and never robustly studied dissection's impact on identity and emotional life (Ilonzo 2022, PMID 35501046).

Surveillance populations are not interchangeable with dissection survivors. In a SCAPIS-derived cross-sectional sample, 67 people with ascending aortic diameter ≥40 mm and 50 age/sex-matched controls reported no statistically significant differences in quality of life, anxiety, depression or physical activity. The small sample cannot exclude modest differences and does not negate distress in selected post-dissection cohorts (Nilsson 2026, PMID 42768306).

Early reports of positive adaptation require a timing qualifier. A qualitative study interviewed 20 surgically treated type A dissection patients at one Chinese tertiary hospital. Themes included changed life priorities, health behaviours and social connections. The full text places every interview before discharge, excludes major psychiatric disorders, and uses prompts about positive change. It describes early perceived adaptation in a selected sample; persistence after discharge and the effect of any psychological intervention were not established (Zhang 2026, PMID 42879453; methods, Tables 1–3 and limitations).

Activity restriction and the exercise conundrum

  • Restriction produces measurable distress in non-syndromic TAA/dissection, concentrated in people for whom activity was identity-defining (McEntire 2021, PMID 34386933).
  • Restricted young HTAD patients largely do not comply: 88% were restricted by a provider, 65% competed in sports anyway, and higher lifetime exercise exposure correlated with better QoL with no detected difference in aortic size or surgical need (n=40, cross-sectional — selection caveats apply; Millette 2024, PMID 39352231).
  • Post-dissection survivors overshoot toward inactivity out of fear: inactivity rose 17%→24% and sexual activity fell 38%→11% "mostly due to fear"; ≥2 aerobic sessions/week correlated with 126.7 vs 141.1 mmHg systolic BP (Chaddha 2015, PMID 26769699). Clinicians describe exercise prescription here as a data-free "conundrum" (Chaddha 2015, PMID 26769698); that historical discussion predates the 2025 AHA/ACC competitive-sports statement, which now provides condition-specific aortopathy considerations (Kim 2025, PMID 39976316; see guidelines). Behavioral studies confirm fear of progression and stigma as exercise barriers (Feng 2022, PMID 35229555; Gao 2025, PMID 40044200).
  • Patient organizations fill the prescription vacuum: VASCERN HTAD patient advocates promote 30 min × 3/week activity; SADN publishes uniform lifestyle advice and personalized cardiac-rehab pathways (see medical-therapy for the pharmacologic side).

Rehabilitation evidence remains observational. A propensity-matched retrospective study after open TAA repair associated outpatient cardiac rehabilitation with lower MACE (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34–0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.59, 0.37–0.94). Selection and residual confounding prevent a causal interpretation or extrapolation to unrepaired TAA (Yamazaki 2026, PMID 42283670).

Survivorship: chronic disease, not cure

Discharge after dissection repair "marks the beginning of lifelong surveillance rather than recovery" (Grewal 2026, PMID 42491301). Documented failure modes of the survivorship system:

  • Follow-up decay. Adverse imaging findings peak at 6–12 months (5.6%) and imaging in that window is associated with lower mortality (HR 0.50), yet real-world surveillance is inconsistent; both the least- and most-frequently seen patients had higher mortality (Chaddha 2019, PMID 31614376). Barriers to follow-up include cost, distance, education, anxiety/depression/PTSD, and clinic design (Lee 2026, PMID 42285644).
  • Medication adherence was 64% at median 7.1 y post-dissection; non-adherence was associated with recurrent chest pain (Chaddha 2018, PMID 29806607).
  • The non-cardiac residue — strokes, relearning fine-motor tasks, vocal-cord injury, loss of defining activities — dominates individual recovery narratives (British Heart Foundation — Heart Matters, "Dancing back to health" [dissection survivor feature], https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/my-story/dancing-back-to-health, accessed 2026-08-27; Aortic Hope — Survivor Series, https://www.aortichope.org/blog/categories/survivorseries, accessed 2026-08-27).
  • COVID-19 disrupted surveillance and exposed the absence of aorta-specific risk guidance, while telehealth unexpectedly improved access to remote aortic specialists (Lee 2022, PMID 35501037; Nishath 2022, PMID 35501040).

In syndromic HTAD the burden is lifelong and extra-aortic: satisfaction with life below population norms with fatigue and dissection history as correlates (Velvin 2016, PMID 26727916); severe fatigue above RA levels (Bathen 2014, PMID 24719044); work participation 59% with early exit and few adaptations (Velvin 2015, PMID 26420568). QoL evidence exists essentially only for Marfan — a 2019 systematic review found zero QoL studies in LDS or vEDS (Velvin 2019, PMID 30788842) — and psychosocial topics were 2% of the pediatric Marfan literature (Lidal 2020, PMID 31977115). See syndromic-aortopathies.

Patient-defined monitoring priorities. A four-phase Dutch single-centre co-creation study included people after acute dissection, elective surgery and those under aneurysm/BAV surveillance. Participants prioritised uncertainty, symptom interpretation, blood-pressure trends, life participation and accessible, proportionate monitoring. They wanted understandable alerts and explicit escalation pathways, with digital tools complementing imaging. These are qualitative design priorities, not a validated instrument or evidence of improved clinical outcomes (Grewal 2026, PMID 42790905).

Family screening and the genetic dimension

Cascade screening is guideline-endorsed (genetics-of-taa, guidelines) but experienced as a burden shifted onto families: a UK mixed-methods evaluation (n=242 patients/relatives + focus groups) found uptake blocked by fragmented services, inconsistent clinician knowledge, proband-borne communication duties, and psychological/practical costs (Abbasciano 2026, PMID 41772284). Patient organizations have made family screening a headline message — Ritter Rules instructs first-degree-relative imaging, citing familial disease in "Up to 1 in 5" (John Ritter Foundation — "Ritter Rules", https://johnritterfoundation.org/ritter-rules/, accessed 2026-08-27) — and a national charity co-runs an NIHR research programme on dissection prevention via family screening (DECIDE-TAD; Aortic Dissection Awareness UK & Ireland, https://aorticdissectionawareness.org/, accessed 2026-08-27). Pregnancy decisions concentrate the genetic burden; patient stakeholders rated pregnancy-associated dissection a top research priority despite its rarity (~0.0004%/pregnancy) (Russo 2022, PMID 35501042; European practice variability in Somalo-Barranco 2026, PMID 42365315).

The organization and campaign landscape

Full verified directory with access dates: ../literature/patient-voice/organizations.md. Shape of the landscape:

Segment Exemplars (verified 2026-08-27) Signature outputs
Gene/syndrome-centered (US umbrella) The Marfan Foundation + divisions (Loeys-Dietz Syndrome Foundation, The VEDS Movement) Helpline, connect groups, research grants, "Genetic Aortic Network"; #LarsonLove awareness campaign (Jonathan Larson, Rent, died at 35 of dissection from undiagnosed Marfan)
Gene/syndrome-centered (national) Marfan Trust (UK), GADA Canada, Marfan Hilfe Deutschland, Association Marfans (FR), Japan Marfan Association, Marfan Association Queensland (AU) Clinics/directories, life-stage seminars, emergency ID cards, research funding (Montalcino Aortic Consortium via GADA)
Dissection-survivor charities Aortic Dissection Awareness UK & Ireland; The Aortic Dissection Charitable Trust; Aortic Hope (US); Stichting Aortadissectie Nederland; John Ritter Foundation (US) Patient guides "written by patients, for patients"; bereavement guides; peer support (Aorta Advocates, Survivor Series, Hope Mail); hospital distribution at scale (5,200+ US hospitals)
Diagnostic-awareness campaigns THINK AORTA (UK/IE → US, CA, AU, BR "PENSE AORTA", ES/CAT, EG, IT; posters in 50 languages); TADCT "Could it be AD?"; Ritter Rules; Turner Syndrome Society "Cardiac Emergency Alert Card" Target: dissection "considered in less than half" of ED presentations; royal-college/ACEP endorsements; named in the surgical literature as an improvement lever (Holmes 2021, PMID 34838743)
Patient-involvement research networks Aortic Dissection Collaborative (US, PCORI); VASCERN HTAD ePAG (EU); DECIDE-TAD (UK, NIHR) Patient-coauthored research agendas (Lee 2022, PMID 35501047); ePAG-coauthored surveys (Somalo-Barranco 2026, PMID 42365315)

Turner syndrome's inclusion is deliberate: TS carries a markedly elevated dissection risk and its US society ships aorta-specific emergency alert cards (Turner Syndrome Society of the US, https://www.turnersyndrome.org/, accessed 2026-08-27; clinical background in syndromic-aortopathies).

Patients as research partners

The field's patient community has moved from beneficiary to co-producer of research:

  • The Aortic Dissection Collaborative (PCORI-funded) surveyed and interviewed the AD community, formed seven working groups with patient stakeholders as co-authors, and published a prioritized patient-centered research agenda — mental health, education, telemedicine, pregnancy, medical management (Lee 2022, PMID 35501047; Ilonzo 2022, PMID 35501046; Talutis 2022, PMID 35501043; Pena 2022, PMID 35501038).
  • Charity co-authorship of clinical papers is now normal: Aortic Dissection Awareness UK & Ireland representatives co-authored the UK COVID aortovascular-service analysis including a patient survey of attitudes to surgery during the pandemic (Harky 2020, PMID 32981073).
  • Recruitment infrastructure: a nationwide Dutch survivor cohort was assembled entirely through the patient foundation SADN (Bacour 2025, PMID 39941528); GADA Canada channels patients into the Montalcino Aortic Consortium; TADCT runs an "Aortic Biobank" (org pages, accessed 2026-08-27).
  • A 2026 review argues patient organisations should be formalized as partners in lifelong post-dissection care — peer support, education, and continuity that health systems do not provide (Grewal 2026, PMID 42491301).

What patients report that the clinical literature underweights

Patient-reported reality State of the clinical literature
Diagnosis-process trauma ("unnecessary drama", misdiagnosis odysseys) Measured as time-to-diagnosis and error rates (Harris 2011, PMID 21969019; Lovatt 2022, PMID 34968970), not as patient harm/experience
PTSD and surveillance anxiety 23% screen-positive vs 7% chart-documented — screening is not routine anywhere (Pasadyn 2020, PMID 32340520); psychological screening recommended but not implemented (Dreher 2025, PMID 40948724)
Activity restriction as identity loss; hunger for exercise prescription No trials; expert "conundrum" editorials only (Chaddha 2015, PMID 26769698); observational signal that exercise associates with better QoL (Millette 2024, PMID 39352231)
Sleep, sexual function, fatigue, work capacity Scattered single-cohort studies (Bacour 2025, PMID 39941528; Luo 2021, PMID 33933114; Bathen 2014, PMID 24719044); absent from surgical outcome reporting
Family-screening burden on probands Uptake studied; the proband's communication/psychological load only now entering the literature (Abbasciano 2026, PMID 41772284)
What "good outcome" means (QoL determinants: acceptance, coordinated care, being seen) Trials report mortality/reintervention; no TAA-specific PROM exists to capture the rest (Velvin 2025, PMID 39789589; Shan 2023, PMID 37451607)

September 2026 patient-education updates

The John Ritter Foundation’s September 13–19 awareness week used a care-pathway theme spanning risk recognition through long-term follow-up. This is educational material, not an evaluation of campaign effectiveness (John Ritter Foundation — “Aortic Dissection Awareness Week”, https://johnritterfoundation.org/aortic-dissection-awareness-week/, accessed 2026-09-30). VASCERN listed a new Marfan guide for teenagers and young adults on September 29, covering surveillance, transition to adult care, everyday activity and family planning; the resource listing was retrieved, but the linked booklet could not be retrieved in this sweep (VASCERN — “Marfan Syndrome: A Guide for Young People”, https://vascern.eu/resources/?langue=57, accessed 2026-09-30).

Open questions

  • Why is there still no validated TAA/dissection-specific patient-reported outcome measure, and what should it contain? PROMIS-29 was only first evaluated in aortic dissection in 2022 (Huang 2022, PMID 35701761); an EJVES editorial flags the PROM vacuum (Shan 2023, PMID 37451607); even AAA has only 5 disease-specific instruments with minimal mental-health capture (Smolderen 2026, PMID 41854119); qualitative work supplies candidate domains — fear management, fatigue, coordinated-care security (Velvin 2025, PMID 39789589).
  • What is the psychological cost of imaging surveillance itself, and does routine mental-health screening in aortic clinics change outcomes? PTSD screen-positivity 23% vs 7% documentation (Pasadyn 2020, PMID 32340520); PTSS burden and a 9.7× odds ratio for pre-existing psychological disorder suggest a screenable high-risk group (Dreher 2025, PMID 40948724) — no interventional study found this session.
  • Can shared decision-making tools work at TAA threshold sizes? A decision-aid RCT exists for asymptomatic AAA (Knops 2014, PMID 24913683) but nothing surfaced for the prophylactic ascending-repair decision at 5.0–5.5 cm, where the size paradox makes the tradeoff genuinely preference-sensitive (risk-stratification-and-size-thresholds); patient stakeholders rank education/decision-support among top priorities (Talutis 2022, PMID 35501043; Lee 2022, PMID 35501047).
  • What exercise is actually safe post-TAA/dissection? Fear-driven inactivity is common and hemodynamically counterproductive (Chaddha 2015, PMID 26769699), restricted youth exercise anyway with apparent QoL benefit (Millette 2024, PMID 39352231), and the recruiting EXTRA trial has no posted results as of 2026-09-30 (NCT04197648) — its registered three-month aortic-diameter endpoint should be evaluated when results become available; patient-reported benefit remains a separate research need.
  • Do awareness campaigns (THINK AORTA et al.) measurably reduce misdiagnosis and time-to-diagnosis? The campaigns are cited approvingly in the surgical/EM literature (Holmes 2021, PMID 34838743; Reed 2024, PMID 38708978) and misdiagnosis remains ~1 in 3 (Lovatt 2022, PMID 34968970), but no controlled before/after evaluation surfaced this session.
  • Does structured patient-organization involvement (peer support, org-mediated follow-up) improve adherence, surveillance retention, or mental health? Plausible mechanisms and recruitment feasibility are demonstrated (Grewal 2026, PMID 42491301; Bacour 2025, PMID 39941528; Lee 2026, PMID 42285644 on follow-up barriers) — effectiveness is untested.

References

  1. Lovatt S, et al. Misdiagnosis of aortic dissection: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;53:16-22. PMID 34968970
  2. Harris KM, et al. Correlates of delayed recognition and treatment of acute type A aortic dissection: the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation. 2011;124:1911-8. PMID 21969019
  3. Holmes HR, et al. Misdiagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Disease Occurs Commonly in Emergency Transfers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114:2202-2208. PMID 34838743
  4. Reed MJ. Diagnosis and management of acute aortic dissection in the emergency department. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024;85:1-9. PMID 38708978
  5. Lee JR, et al. Lived experiences of people with or at risk for aortic dissection: A qualitative assessment. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:78-87. PMID 35501045
  6. Pasadyn SR, et al. From Tear to Fear: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015060. PMID 32340520
  7. Chaddha A, et al. Survivors of Aortic Dissection: Activity, Mental Health, and Sexual Function. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:652-9. PMID 26769699
  8. Chaddha A, et al. Exercise and Physical Activity for the Post-Aortic Dissection Patient: The Clinician's Conundrum. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:647-51. PMID 26769698
  9. Chaddha A, et al. Cardiology patient page: Activity recommendations for postaortic dissection patients. Circulation. 2014;130:e140-2. PMID 25311622
  10. Chaddha A, et al. Medication adherence patterns in aortic dissection survivors. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147:183-188. PMID 29806607
  11. Chaddha A, et al. The Clinical Impact of Imaging Surveillance and Clinic Visit Frequency after Acute Aortic Dissection. Aorta (Stamford). 2019;7:75-83. PMID 31614376
  12. McEntire A, et al. Psychological distress in response to physical activity restrictions in patients with non-syndromic thoracic aortic aneurysm/dissection. J Community Genet. 2021;12:631-641. PMID 34386933
  13. Millette TJ, et al. Exercise, Sports Participation, and Quality of Life in Young Patients with Heritable Thoracic Aortic Disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 (print 2025);57:260-266. PMID 39352231
  14. Dreher H, et al. Symptoms of post-traumatic distress and quality of life in adults with aortopathy and congenital heart defects or hereditary connective tissue diseases. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025;15:781-791. PMID 40948724
  15. Liu C, et al. Psychological experiences of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection during the preoperative waiting period: a qualitative study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2026;26. PMID 42277648
  16. Bacour Y, et al. From Survival to Recovery: Understanding the Life Impact of an Acute Aortic Dissection Through Activity, Sleep, and Quality of Life. J Clin Med. 2025;14:859. PMID 39941528
  17. Luo B, et al. Comparative analysis of postoperative sexual dysfunction and quality of life in type A aortic dissection patients of different ages. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:117. PMID 33933114
  18. Feng J, et al. Attitudes and behavioral intentions of aortic dissection survivors towards exercise: an application of the health action process approach framework. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022;23:64. PMID 35229555
  19. Gao J, et al. Influencing factors of health promotion behaviour in patients with aortic dissection: a qualitative study using the COM-B model. BMJ Open. 2025;15:e076181. PMID 40044200
  20. Velvin G, et al. Quality of life in people with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic disease and their relatives: a qualitative interview based study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025;20:12. PMID 39789589
  21. Velvin G, et al. Systematic review of quality of life in persons with hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection diagnoses. Clin Genet. 2019;95:661-676. PMID 30788842
  22. Velvin G, et al. Satisfaction with life in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS): associations with health-related consequences of MFS, pain, fatigue, and demographic factors. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:1779-90. PMID 26727916
  23. Velvin G, et al. Work participation in adults with Marfan syndrome: Demographic characteristics, MFS related health symptoms, chronic pain, and fatigue. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A:3082-90. PMID 26420568
  24. Bathen T, et al. Fatigue in adults with Marfan syndrome, occurrence and associations to pain and other factors. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:1931-9. PMID 24719044
  25. Lidal IB, et al. A scoping review presenting a wide variety of research on paediatric and adolescent patients with Marfan syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109:1758-1771. PMID 31977115
  26. Abbasciano R, et al. Patient and family perspectives on cascade screening for thoracic aortic disease: a mixed-methods evaluation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2026;34:947-955. PMID 41772284
  27. Russo M, et al. Aortic dissection in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:60-68. PMID 35501042
  28. Somalo-Barranco G, et al. Management of pregnancy in women with rare multisystemic vascular diseases: a qualitative survey analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2026. PMID 42365315
  29. Lee JR, et al. The Aortic Dissection Collaborative: Methods for building capacity for patient-centered outcomes research in the aortic dissection community. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:9-15. PMID 35501047
  30. Ilonzo N, et al. The mental health impact of aortic dissection. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:88-99. PMID 35501046
  31. Talutis SD, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on education in aortic dissection. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:69-77. PMID 35501043
  32. Pena RCF, et al. An assessment of the current medical management of thoracic aortic disease: A patient-centered scoping literature review. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:16-34. PMID 35501038
  33. Nishath T, et al. Implementation of telemedicine in the care of patients with aortic dissection. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:43-50. PMID 35501040
  34. Lee JR, et al. A mixed method approach to understanding the impact of COVID-19 on patients with or at risk for aortic dissection. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022;35:100-109. PMID 35501037
  35. Harky A, et al. COVID-19 and cardiac surgery: A perspective from United Kingdom. J Card Surg. 2020 (print 2021);36:1649-1658. PMID 32981073
  36. Lee MY, et al. Lost to follow-up: A narrative review of socioeconomic, psychosocial, and systemic barriers to aortic dissection surveillance. Semin Vasc Surg. 2026;39:166-172. PMID 42285644
  37. Grewal S, et al. From survival to lifelong care: The role of patient organisations in aortic dissection. Am Heart J Plus. 2026;68:100834. PMID 42491301
  38. Shan R, et al. Dissecting Aortas and Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;66:351. PMID 37451607
  39. Huang W, et al. Preliminary evaluation of the Chinese version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in patients with aortic dissection. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20:94. PMID 35701761
  40. Smolderen KG, et al. Evolving dynamic needs for patient-reported outcomes assessment in individuals with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): A systematic review. Vasc Med. 2026;31:232-245. PMID 41854119

  41. Knops AM, et al. A decision aid regarding treatment options for patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:276-83. PMID 24913683

  42. Nilsson F, et al. Health-related quality of life, psychological well-being and physical activity in patients with mild-to-moderate ascending aortic dilation - a cross-sectional case-control study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2026;26(1). PMID 42768306. doi:10.1186/s12872-026-06616-9

  43. Yamazaki C, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation Improves Outcomes After Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair. JACC Asia. 2026;6(9):2066-2077. PMID 42283670. doi:10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.04.018
  44. Grewal N, et al. Co-creating a patient-driven digital monitoring agenda for thoracic aortic disease: a multiphase qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2026;16(9):e121086. PMID 42790905. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121086

  45. Kim JH, et al. Clinical Considerations for Competitive Sports Participation for Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85(10):1059-1108. PMID 39976316. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.12.025

  46. Zhang P, et al. Lived experiences of post-traumatic growth in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2026;21(10):e0358013. PMID 42879453. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0358013

Web sources (non-journal; per CONVENTIONS §1 cited inline as Publisher — "Title", URL, accessed date): original organization and campaign pages verified 2026-08-27, September additions accessed 2026-09-30 — full annotated list with access dates in ../literature/patient-voice/organizations.md and ../literature/patient-voice/sources.md.